And that is precisely the problem. People should believe that for which there is evidence and substantiation, not social conditioning and brainwashing. If what you say is true, go ahead and just believe in the Chupacabra, Bigfoot, and the Abominable Snowman too.
Did Jesus Christ Exist as a historical person? If so, who was he?
- Contrarian Expatriate
- Elite Upper Class Poster
- Posts: 5415
- Joined: December 2nd, 2009, 9:57 pm
Re: Was there a historical Jesus Christ? If so, who was he?
Meet Loads of Foreign Women in Person! Join Our Happier Abroad ROMANCE TOURS to Many Overseas Countries!
Meet Foreign Women Now! Post your FREE profile on Happier Abroad Personals and start receiving messages from gorgeous Foreign Women today!
Re: Was there a historical Jesus Christ? If so, who was he?
Here is an example of how the New Testament uses cynic philosophy.
When asked why he ate with tax collectors and sinners, Jesus replied, “Those who are well have no need of a physician.” (Mark 2:17)
Below is a similar quote from Antisthenes hundreds of years earlier, who was a student of Socrates:
When censured for keeping bad company, Antisthenes replied, “Well, physicians attend their patients without catching the fever.”
The book lists several dozens of these parallels.
When asked why he ate with tax collectors and sinners, Jesus replied, “Those who are well have no need of a physician.” (Mark 2:17)
Below is a similar quote from Antisthenes hundreds of years earlier, who was a student of Socrates:
When censured for keeping bad company, Antisthenes replied, “Well, physicians attend their patients without catching the fever.”
The book lists several dozens of these parallels.
Re: Was there a historical Jesus Christ? If so, who was he?
The God and Father of all humanity is the source of all wisdom and knowledge and gives the proper answer to wise men.
Prudence is the knowledge of things to be sought, and those to be shunned.
- Contrarian Expatriate
- Elite Upper Class Poster
- Posts: 5415
- Joined: December 2nd, 2009, 9:57 pm
Re: Was there a historical Jesus Christ? If so, who was he?
Ridiculous. So man is not able to glean wisdom and knowledge on his own? Trial, error, and experience give rise to knowledge and wisdom, unless you want to give god credit for ignorance, stupidity, and wickedness too. Oh, that does not fit your religious narrative, huh?
Re: Was there a historical Jesus Christ? If so, who was he?
The other thing is, some people want to believe that Jesus was illiterate, yet He was able to capture the knowledge of Greeks from 300 or more years before Him.
Antisthenes - Greek philosopher
Born: 445 BC, Athens, Greece
Died: 365 BC, Athens, Greece
By the way, I have nothing against Antisthenes. I'm a lover of wisdom myself, and I quoted him here on this forum just a few weeks ago: "The most useful piece of learning for the uses of life is to unlearn what is untrue."
Antisthenes - Greek philosopher
Born: 445 BC, Athens, Greece
Died: 365 BC, Athens, Greece
By the way, I have nothing against Antisthenes. I'm a lover of wisdom myself, and I quoted him here on this forum just a few weeks ago: "The most useful piece of learning for the uses of life is to unlearn what is untrue."
Prudence is the knowledge of things to be sought, and those to be shunned.
Re: Was there a historical Jesus Christ? If so, who was he?
Historically people's level of religiousness has been correlated with just about every positive outcome for life. Do you have a better religion for him?
Re: Was there a historical Jesus Christ? If so, who was he?
Goddess worship works for me, meaning live in accordance with the laws of Mother Nature. However, I am way above average in intelligence and especially in physical self-discipline. Possibly unthinking belief in primitive cults works better at bringing about long term happiness (only "positive outcome for life" that matters) in average people.
Re: Was there a historical Jesus Christ? If so, who was he?
Living in accordance with the laws of Mother Nature means not getting wiped out biologically and culturally in a single generation, which is what you seem to be preaching. Mother Nature doesn't tolerate that. There will not be a single person repeating this argument as a result of you or perhaps at all in 100 years time.Shemp wrote: ↑June 21st, 2019, 1:40 amGoddess worship works for me, meaning live in accordance with the laws of Mother Nature. However, I am way above average in intelligence and especially in physical self-discipline. Possibly unthinking belief in primitive cults works better at bringing about long term happiness (only "positive outcome for life" that matters) in average people.
Re: Was there a historical Jesus Christ? If so, who was he?
No, Mother Nature gives us desires and sometimes she also gives opportunities to fulfill them, in which case worshipping the Goddess and following her laws means taking advantage of those opportunities. In my case, Mother Nature gave me the desire for sex (in part, my sexual preferences are learned, but ignore that for the moment) and the opportunity to fulfill those desires, such as like yesterday with my beautiful young Ukrainian rental girlfriend. In my case, Mother Nature did NOT give a desire for children per se. A hundred years ago, fulfilling my desire for sex with that young Ukrainian would have inevitably resulted in children eventually, but nowadays not, because of birth control.
What is happening is that humans are evolving. Only those humans who want children for their own sake, rather than children as a by-product of sex, are reproducing, so that desire for children for their own sake will eventually be universal. Men like me and CE, who have no desire for children fur their own sake, are evolutionary dead ends under current conditions, though in the past we were not. In the past, our ability to accumulate resources and stay in good physical condition until old age and be attractive to much younger women would have made us very successful at reproducing. But conditions have changed and so now we go extinct, same as mammoths and saber toothed tigers were successful under ice age conditions and then went extinct when conditions changed. Humans and other animals are constantly evolving.
Your (@Cornfed's) inability to accept this and other realities is rebellion against the Goddess and her laws, and is why you are being punished with a miserable life.
What is happening is that humans are evolving. Only those humans who want children for their own sake, rather than children as a by-product of sex, are reproducing, so that desire for children for their own sake will eventually be universal. Men like me and CE, who have no desire for children fur their own sake, are evolutionary dead ends under current conditions, though in the past we were not. In the past, our ability to accumulate resources and stay in good physical condition until old age and be attractive to much younger women would have made us very successful at reproducing. But conditions have changed and so now we go extinct, same as mammoths and saber toothed tigers were successful under ice age conditions and then went extinct when conditions changed. Humans and other animals are constantly evolving.
Your (@Cornfed's) inability to accept this and other realities is rebellion against the Goddess and her laws, and is why you are being punished with a miserable life.
Re: Was there a historical Jesus Christ? If so, who was he?
Well, at least that is something positive about the situation in that the likes of you and CE are voluntarily exiting the stage. I think there are various negatives about the prescriptions of the alleged "Goddess" but oh well you have made your choice. I think there is something positive about my genetic line (I concede I may be wrong given certain family members) and want it to continue, if not in genes then in ideas, not for me but for something outside myself.Shemp wrote: ↑June 21st, 2019, 3:57 amNo, Mother Nature gives us desires and sometimes she also gives opportunities to fulfill them, in which case worshipping the Goddess and following her laws means taking advantage of those opportunities. In my case, Mother Nature gave me the desire for sex (in part, my sexual preferences are learned, but ignore that for the moment) and the opportunity to fulfill those desires, such as like yesterday with my beautiful young Ukrainian rental girlfriend. In my case, Mother Nature did NOT give a desire for children per se. A hundred years ago, fulfilling my desire for sex with that young Ukrainian would have inevitably resulted in children eventually, but nowadays not, because of birth control.
What is happening is that humans are evolving. Only those humans who want children for their own sake, rather than children as a by-product of sex, are reproducing, so that desire for children for their own sake will eventually be universal. Men like me and CE, who have no desire for children fur their own sake, are evolutionary dead ends under current conditions, though in the past we were not. In the past, our ability to accumulate resources and stay in good physical condition until old age and be attractive to much younger women would have made us very successful at reproducing. But conditions have changed and so now we go extinct, same as mammoths and saber toothed tigers were successful under ice age conditions and then went extinct when conditions changed. Humans and other animals are constantly evolving.
Your (@Cornfed's) inability to accept this and other realities is rebellion against the Goddess and her laws, and is why you are being punished with a miserable life.
- Contrarian Expatriate
- Elite Upper Class Poster
- Posts: 5415
- Joined: December 2nd, 2009, 9:57 pm
Re: Was there a historical Jesus Christ? If so, who was he?
I'm not so sure about the evolutionary dead end theory. If you have siblings with children or even cousins with children (I have many), then there will be plenty of your genes moving forward. But keep in mind that the genes of our 4 grandparents only slightly resemble ours and they get even more different as you go farther back.
The undying obsession with "Passin on muh genes" is a preoccupation of the low IQ and those which nothing concrete to gift the world, in other words, the Cornfeds among us. Moreover, his alternate obsession with "Passin on muh ideas" is even more pathetic because children develop their own ideas because they are unique individuals, not reproductions of us.
For the record, I am vociferously anti-marriage, but I have not yet closed the door on siring and raising children as an unmarried man. This has nothing to do with gene continuation, but everything to do with passing on generational wealth and privilege instead of simply enriching my favorite causes.
Re: Was there a historical Jesus Christ? If so, who was he?
Yes, truly horrible that he wants to burden yet another generation with his way of thinking. As I wrote before, he better hope Christianity is big lie, otherwise he's going to be roasting in hellfire for a very long time to get all that evilness purified out of him.Contrarian Expatriate wrote: ↑June 21st, 2019, 5:35 amhis alternate obsession with "Passin on muh ideas" is even more pathetic
- Contrarian Expatriate
- Elite Upper Class Poster
- Posts: 5415
- Joined: December 2nd, 2009, 9:57 pm
Re: Was there a historical Jesus Christ? If so, who was he?
True enough. I suspect he is already living hell on earth given how he describes his life (long term unemployed, obese, medical ailments, sexless, and mopes around the house drinking beer). If he were not such a reprobate, I would actually feel quite sorry for him.Shemp wrote: ↑June 21st, 2019, 5:49 amYes, truly horrible that he wants to burden yet another generation with his way of thinking. As I wrote before, he better hope Christianity is big lie, otherwise he's going to be roasting in hellfire for a very long time to get all that evilness purified out of him.Contrarian Expatriate wrote: ↑June 21st, 2019, 5:35 amhis alternate obsession with "Passin on muh ideas" is even more pathetic
Re: Was there a historical Jesus Christ? If so, who was he?
Any and every religion other than Christianity is Satanic. And those false denominations of Christianity that state that a person must trust in their own works or repentance in addition to trusting in Christ are wrong.
(Christ is the Savior and His works are complete. All a person has to do is trust in Him and His works to be saved. Salvation is a free gift given to all that believe on Him and who also do not trust in their own works to save them. Then His righteousness is imputed onto that person, making them worthy to live again. )
Mother goddess worship doesn't save the soul. Worship of Aleister Crowley doesn't save the soul. Gnosticism doesn't save the soul. Buddhism does not save the soul. Islam does not save (no redeemer who paid their sins, and they do not believe Jesus is the Son of God).
Last edited by Neo on June 19th, 2020, 11:21 am, edited 1 time in total.
Prudence is the knowledge of things to be sought, and those to be shunned.
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 1 Replies
- 936 Views
-
Last post by 69ixine
-
- 0 Replies
- 903 Views
-
Last post by Winston
-
- 1 Replies
- 1283 Views
-
Last post by willymonfrete
-
- 11 Replies
- 4418 Views
-
Last post by Winston
-
- 15 Replies
- 9476 Views
-
Last post by pandabear