American female singers

odbo · Post by **odbo** » February 1st, 2011, 1:47 am

I heard this song on the radio while driving. Really says everything doesn't it.

#2) Kate Perry

MrPeabody · Post by **MrPeabody** » February 1st, 2011, 2:12 am

Catchy song and attractive little demons. But please keep in mind that women are just keeping up with the times and spontaneously expressing their freedom. There isn't actually anyone planning our destruction.

odbo · Post by **odbo** » February 1st, 2011, 2:35 am

women are just keeping up with the times and spontaneously expressing their freedom. There isn't actually anyone planning our destruction

whatever helps you sleep at night

Mr S · Post by **Mr S** » February 1st, 2011, 4:55 am

So what did that Esquire magazine have to say about American women? Or is it just a picture of one of their covers you found? It would be interesting what they wrote about back then to see how much truth there is to the magazine article today.

BTW that song sucks, it's quite annoying to listen to.

FreeYourMind · Post by **FreeYourMind** » February 1st, 2011, 11:04 am

Mr S wrote:So what did that Esquire magazine have to say about American women? Or is it just a picture of one of their covers you found? It would be interesting what they wrote about back then to see how much truth there is to the magazine article today.

I was wondering that too, given that the article came out right before the Cultural Marxists went into permanent revolution mode and turned society upside down.

MrPeabody · Post by **MrPeabody** » February 1st, 2011, 2:45 pm

I couldn't make out the date, but it looks like the Esquire article is referring to the hippie girls indoctrinated in the 60s. They would be the mothers of the girls shown in the pictures.

It only took two generations to change from this:

odbo · Post by **odbo** » February 6th, 2011, 2:08 am

globetrotter · Post by **globetrotter** » February 6th, 2011, 7:57 am

Linux Only your brand of arrogance annoys adults.

You also conflate correlation as causative and you have a belief system that cannot accept coincidences.

Other than that, you are the apotheosis of enlightenment.

odbo · Post by **odbo** » February 6th, 2011, 3:55 pm

apotheosis

gsjackson · Post by **gsjackson** » February 6th, 2011, 5:32 pm

LinuxOnly wrote:I've acted arrogant and annoying since I got here, no question.
but all i've seen you do is run around trying to debunk people's view points.

I wonder what it's like to live completely in the dark, where everything indeed is an accident or coincidence.
There are no dots to be connected. Nothing lies beneath the surface.. pay no attention to the man behind the curtain.

Barry Soetoro, some darkie from Indonesia with 1 letter separating his made-up name from Osama, just walked into being Senator of Illinois.
after 1year and a half he was ready to run for president of the world's dominant nation. All makes perfect sense, no need to use your brain here.
And we can all be sure he runs the country and isn't just a puppet. Because empires are totally selfless and willing to relinquish all power to upload the ideals of democracy.

And of course now the US is being collapsed from within because of "incompetence".

It must be annoying having to curse "conspiracy theorists", seeing as how they're growing exponentially these days.
You're the last sane person on this forum, and we've all been taken in by this contagious virus called conscious thought.

join us. we want your brain. for you to f***ing use it

drop your ego and explore reality, without worrying about what will happen. over come those psychological barriers which prevent you from learning anything of real value.

you're in china, so you've overcome the nationalism/patriotism garbage. what's stopping you? your pride? (your ego) or are you just completely blind

So where does the standard characterization of Obama on the left -- that he, like virtually every other mainstream American pol, is a wholly owned subsidiary of various financial interests -- fall short? What reason is there to believe in any more intricate "conspiracy" than that? Sure, the oligarchy controls public policy. That hasn't been news for about 140 years.

Your characterization of Obama seems off the mark. He didn't come out of nowhere. He was editor-in-chief of Harvard Law Review, the pinnacle of the academic meritocracy, 26 years ago, and has been identified ever since them as an oratorical star by everyone who has been associated with him. he passed on the big bucks to launch a political career by becoming a community organizer. He took aim at that Illinois Senate seat and beyond a quarter century ago. According to the book Game Change, he was asked to run for president in '08 by Harry Reid because the Dems didn't think Hillary could win, in large part because of her husband's ongoing philandering. I have no doubt that Obama was thoroughly vetted by the financial powers-that-be before his candidacy was launched, but I don't have any reason to think it was anything more than that.

odbo · Post by **odbo** » February 6th, 2011, 6:54 pm

i posted A SONG WITH LYRICS.
please LISTEN to the SONGS before posting.

gsjackson wrote:I have no doubt that Obama was thoroughly vetted by the financial powers-that-be before his candidacy was launched, but I don't have any reason to think it was anything more than that.

odbo · Post by **odbo** » February 8th, 2011, 11:32 pm

nice fat hog

Mr S · Post by **Mr S** » February 9th, 2011, 7:17 am

LinuxOnly wrote:How far we've come from the glory days

you'll want to watch this in full screen mode

Wow, that was quite horrible as well as horrifying. To think that someone actually recorded something like this is beyond my comprehension!

DaRick · Post by **DaRick** » February 9th, 2011, 7:57 pm

gsjackson wrote:So where does the standard characterization of Obama on the left -- that he, like virtually every other mainstream American pol, is a wholly owned subsidiary of various financial interests -- fall short? What reason is there to believe in any more intricate "conspiracy" than that? Sure, the oligarchy controls public policy. That hasn't been news for about 140 years.

Your characterization of Obama seems off the mark. He didn't come out of nowhere. He was editor-in-chief of Harvard Law Review, the pinnacle of the academic meritocracy, 26 years ago, and has been identified ever since them as an oratorical star by everyone who has been associated with him. he passed on the big bucks to launch a political career by becoming a community organizer. He took aim at that Illinois Senate seat and beyond a quarter century ago. According to the book Game Change, he was asked to run for president in '08 by Harry Reid because the Dems didn't think Hillary could win, in large part because of her husband's ongoing philandering. I have no doubt that Obama was thoroughly vetted by the financial powers-that-be before his candidacy was launched, but I don't have any reason to think it was anything more than that.

There is no evidence that he actually published anything whilst editor-in-chief. In fact, he was so anonymous that few people actually remember him from his time at Harvard or Columbia. For an ace orator, he also relies on his teleprompter a lot.

He initially ran to represent the First District of Illinois as a congressman but lost to Bobby Rush, a convicted felon. He then won the Senate seat, not necessarily in a fair election, but because all of his opponents were disqualified or compelled to discontinue their campaigns through technicalities or scandals.

To be honest, he was elected because he was black. That's honestly what I believe. His intellect is wildly overhyped (i.e - he thinks that Austrian is a language) and he did not have a lot of political experience. He was known for voting 'present' in his capacity as a Senator. Hell, even Sarah Palin had some legitimate executive experience in her capacity as Governor of Alaska, during which she actually did some things of note. Not that I'm much of a fan of her - it just demonstrates how much Barack has been favoured by affirmative action throughout his adulthood.

Adama · Post by **Adama** » February 17th, 2011, 6:43 pm

Pay no attention to Globetrotter's condemnation. He is against conspiracy simply because each and every one always leads back to the truth - the so called Chosen people.