Patriarch RooshV Excommunicates Heretics

[Tsar]

From what people have said, I was thinking earlier today that RooshV has become Patriarch RooshV and he will excommunicate all heretics. I would probably suggest that no one join his forum unless they're really serious about religion.

His forum should be called the Patriarchate of Roosh

[WanderingProtagonist]

From what people have said, I was thinking earlier today that RooshV has become Patriarch RooshV and he will excommunicate all heretics. I would probably suggest that no one join his forum unless they're really serious about religion.

His forum should be called the Patriarchate of Roosh

Yeah I tried to delete my account there but couldn't figure out how to do it. I think only he can remove them.
So I just unlogged from the site and won't log into it anymore. The guy sucks, he may have been labeled a pig by feminists, and what not that hated him during his PUA days, but at least he allowed freedom on his old site. Now...? He reminds me why I hate leftist so much and why I can't stand certain religious types either. Both sides believe in censorship, one does it because "Faith" reasons the other do it because "I need my safe space and don't like being offended." Either way, I only went to his site because it was more active with a lot of post that was fresh every day compared to this site which seems to have slowed down over the years. I see a lot of users in old post I never see posting on here anymore. But that guy will ban people even if they don't say something offensive about religion.

[E Irizarry R&B Singer]

From what people have said, I was thinking earlier today that RooshV has become Patriarch RooshV and he will excommunicate all heretics. I would probably suggest that no one join his forum unless they're really serious about religion.

His forum should be called the Patriarchate of Roosh

Yeah I tried to delete my account there but couldn't figure out how to do it. I think only he can remove them.
So I just unlogged from the site and won't log into it anymore. The guy sucks, he may have been labeled a pig by feminists, and what not that hated him during his PUA days, but at least he allowed freedom on his old site. Now...? He reminds me why I hate leftist so much and why I can't stand certain religious types either. Both sides believe in censorship, one does it because "Faith" reasons the other do it because "I need my safe space and don't like being offended." Either way, I only went to his site because it was more active with a lot of post that was fresh every day compared to this site which seems to have slowed down over the years. I see a lot of users in old post I never see posting on here anymore. But that guy will ban people even if they don't say something offensive about religion.

So from a philosophical POV via watching his videos online, he's great, but no need to meet him in person from what I've heard. He actually admitted he di*ck-policed RooshV-supporter guys that came out to meet him in the club (if they are both physically there in that foreign country it's in) if they are "killing it" with the females in there. Yeah: code word for c*ockblocking.

[MrMan]

Freedom of the press means dince it is his website he gets to choose what stays there. I do not know if I have read the forum at all, but considering the whoremongering them of his work previously I can imagine he would lose a lot of traffic if he doesn't allow promoting that sort of thing.

By whoremongering I mean the traditional sense of the word which includes zero dollar whores.

[WanderingProtagonist]

From what people have said, I was thinking earlier today that RooshV has become Patriarch RooshV and he will excommunicate all heretics. I would probably suggest that no one join his forum unless they're really serious about religion.

His forum should be called the Patriarchate of Roosh

Yeah I tried to delete my account there but couldn't figure out how to do it. I think only he can remove them.
So I just unlogged from the site and won't log into it anymore. The guy sucks, he may have been labeled a pig by feminists, and what not that hated him during his PUA days, but at least he allowed freedom on his old site. Now...? He reminds me why I hate leftist so much and why I can't stand certain religious types either. Both sides believe in censorship, one does it because "Faith" reasons the other do it because "I need my safe space and don't like being offended." Either way, I only went to his site because it was more active with a lot of post that was fresh every day compared to this site which seems to have slowed down over the years. I see a lot of users in old post I never see posting on here anymore. But that guy will ban people even if they don't say something offensive about religion.

I made an account on there. I made it when this forum was down to have a little scout around. Lol. It's pretty much an echo chamber of the God Squad. Roosh criticised my beliefs and ordered I investigate Orthodox Christianity because my current belief system is a dead end.

You should come back on there @WanderingProtagonist and we'll see which of us gets banned first first of us to get banned wins a chocy biccy. But we're not allowed to use personal attacks, instead we have to get banned by debating with these Christians.

lol, he banned me once before because I "trolled" when I called people on the right just as weak and scared as people are on the left. Then I questioned how would they prevent a full blown Gov crackdown on their farmland and how would they manage to entertain themselves without going crazy. I don't know, it was enough to get me kicked off just for saying that. Then I checked the reason and it said "trolling."

[WanderingProtagonist]

From what people have said, I was thinking earlier today that RooshV has become Patriarch RooshV and he will excommunicate all heretics. I would probably suggest that no one join his forum unless they're really serious about religion.

His forum should be called the Patriarchate of Roosh

Yeah I tried to delete my account there but couldn't figure out how to do it. I think only he can remove them.
So I just unlogged from the site and won't log into it anymore. The guy sucks, he may have been labeled a pig by feminists, and what not that hated him during his PUA days, but at least he allowed freedom on his old site. Now...? He reminds me why I hate leftist so much and why I can't stand certain religious types either. Both sides believe in censorship, one does it because "Faith" reasons the other do it because "I need my safe space and don't like being offended." Either way, I only went to his site because it was more active with a lot of post that was fresh every day compared to this site which seems to have slowed down over the years. I see a lot of users in old post I never see posting on here anymore. But that guy will ban people even if they don't say something offensive about religion.

So from a philosophical POV via watching his videos online, he's great, but no need to meet him in person from what I've heard. He actually admitted he di*ck-policed RooshV-supporter guys that came out to meet him in the club (if they are both physically there in that foreign country it's in) if they are "killing it" with the females in there. Yeah: code word for c*ockblocking.

I never thought much of the man to be honest. Back in the day I use to visit his Return of the King site every time I got bored and just wanted to read something. Or just to see someone rip on leftist, liberals, feminist, soyboys, etc. He even attacked Conservatives before Or just anyone responsible for the decaying of Western civilization.

[MrMan]

Freedom of the press means dince it is his website he gets to choose what stays there. I do not know if I have read the forum at all, but considering the whoremongering them of his work previously I can imagine he would lose a lot of traffic if he doesn't allow promoting that sort of thing.

By whoremongering I mean the traditional sense of the word which includes zero dollar whores.

Oh, Roosh is a reformed man, Mrman, man. In fact I started to think about you and wondered why you prefer Winston's forum to RooshV.com. by the way this isn't me trying to be sarcy or anything, I am genuinely curious why you don't use Roosh's forum. The majority of people in there are Christian, but I've heard he's even banned Christians for no reason. It depends which form of Christianity you follow. Which denomination are you?

This forum is supposed to be about living overseas. I don't know what Roosh's forum is about now. It was a pick-up artist's forum?

I believe the Bible. I'm not from an Armenian Orthodox background. Is that Roosh's background?

[Mew6ix]

After having sex in his 20s and 30s, Douche V became an Orthodox Russian Christian in his 40s after his sister suspiciously died from a fast attacking cancer at a young age. Some think it was a CIA hit on his family. Can't criticize feminists anymore.

[MrMan]

After having sex in his 20s and 30s, Douche V became an Orthodox Russian Christian in his 40s after his sister suspiciously died from a fast attacking cancer at a young age. Some think it was a CIA hit on his family. Can't criticize feminists anymore.

If that were the case, why wouldn't they give him cancer instead of his sister? Giving his sister cancer would be a round-about way of getting to him.

[Outcast9428]

I might check out Roosh V's forum myself at some point. @Mew6ix I don't why you said you can't criticize feminists anymore I just checked and everybody is against feminism there. It sounds like you can talk about the JQ too...

https://www.rooshvforum.com/threads/jew ... st-1623495

I'm not surprised he ended up where he is right now actually. First it began with disliking feminism, then it morphed to realizing that female promiscuity was bad. For years though he continued with that stupid "lock and key" argument in order to explain why he, as a PUA, was condemning sluts. Ultimately, any true anti-feminist is going to realize that sexual liberalism and feminism go hand in hand. The only reason why sexually liberal lifestyles are possible in the first place is because women are independent. If women are not independent they can't be degenerates because they need a long term provider they can trust.

I'd argue that there's three stages of anti-feminism. Right-leaning liberals who just dislike political correctness but support sexual liberalism are 20% anti-feminist. Mainstream conservatives who oppose sexual liberalism but don't oppose the women's independence movement are 50% anti-feminist. Only the traditionalists are true anti-feminists. In order to be a traditionalist, you have to oppose the sexual revolution and the women's independence movement. Most mainstream conservatives stick to criticizing sexual liberalism because its easier to criticize but ultimately, unless you're the Middle East or Africa and have institutionalized polygamy, all degeneracy stems from the female liberation/independence movement.

As for Roosh V's "reformation." I am happy he has changed. He certainly took his sweet time on changing but I think living a life of degeneracy for so long taught him how empty and joyless the promiscuous lifestyle really is. This happens to a lot of former degenerates and is the main reason why older men tend to be against sexual degeneracy whereas its very difficult to get a lot of young men to be against it... Because they just haven't suffered the consequences of it yet. They look at people who tell them its wrong the same way a child looks at their parent when their parent says not to jump off the roof of the house.

[HouseMD]

I might check out Roosh V's forum myself at some point. @Mew6ix I don't why you said you can't criticize feminists anymore I just checked and everybody is against feminism there. It sounds like you can talk about the JQ too...

https://www.rooshvforum.com/threads/jew ... st-1623495

I'm not surprised he ended up where he is right now actually. First it began with disliking feminism, then it morphed to realizing that female promiscuity was bad. For years though he continued with that stupid "lock and key" argument in order to explain why he, as a PUA, was condemning sluts. Ultimately, any true anti-feminist is going to realize that sexual liberalism and feminism go hand in hand. The only reason why sexually liberal lifestyles are possible in the first place is because women are independent. If women are not independent they can't be degenerates because they need a long term provider they can trust.

I'd argue that there's three stages of anti-feminism. Right-leaning liberals who just dislike political correctness but support sexual liberalism are 20% anti-feminist. Mainstream conservatives who oppose sexual liberalism but don't oppose the women's independence movement are 50% anti-feminist. Only the traditionalists are true anti-feminists. In order to be a traditionalist, you have to oppose the sexual revolution and the women's independence movement. Most mainstream conservatives stick to criticizing sexual liberalism because its easier to criticize but ultimately, unless you're the Middle East or Africa and have institutionalized polygamy, all degeneracy stems from the female liberation/independence movement.

As for Roosh V's "reformation." I am happy he has changed. He certainly took his sweet time on changing but I think living a life of degeneracy for so long taught him how empty and joyless the promiscuous lifestyle really is. This happens to a lot of former degenerates and is the main reason why older men tend to be against sexual degeneracy whereas its very difficult to get a lot of young men to be against it... Because they just haven't suffered the consequences of it yet. They look at people who tell them its wrong the same way a child looks at their parent when their parent says not to jump off the roof of the house.

You should check it out. I said the same to MrMan. Most people on the site are Christians with traditional values such as yourself. Not that I'm trying to get rid of you guys lol. I actually value this site for its diversity of opinions etc. Makes things more interesting. That's why I started the thread about Christianity, atheism and spirituality.

I think Roosh has "reformed" because he's too old to carry on the pick up artistry and so now he endeavours to find a Christian wife with traditional values pmsl. I think he's full of it. He had a go at me for not being Christian, but as of yet I haven't been banned lol.

He's too old for his prior tricks to work and he just wants to settle down is the vibe I get as well. Personally I prefer to have a few loyal women at a time rather than his banging every woman he could original strategy. Harem>>>player every time

[E Irizarry R&B Singer]

I might check out Roosh V's forum myself at some point. @Mew6ix I don't why you said you can't criticize feminists anymore I just checked and everybody is against feminism there. It sounds like you can talk about the JQ too...

https://www.rooshvforum.com/threads/jew ... st-1623495

I'm not surprised he ended up where he is right now actually. First it began with disliking feminism, then it morphed to realizing that female promiscuity was bad. For years though he continued with that stupid "lock and key" argument in order to explain why he, as a PUA, was condemning sluts. Ultimately, any true anti-feminist is going to realize that sexual liberalism and feminism go hand in hand. The only reason why sexually liberal lifestyles are possible in the first place is because women are independent. If women are not independent they can't be degenerates because they need a long term provider they can trust.

I'd argue that there's three stages of anti-feminism. Right-leaning liberals who just dislike political correctness but support sexual liberalism are 20% anti-feminist. Mainstream conservatives who oppose sexual liberalism but don't oppose the women's independence movement are 50% anti-feminist. Only the traditionalists are true anti-feminists. In order to be a traditionalist, you have to oppose the sexual revolution and the women's independence movement. Most mainstream conservatives stick to criticizing sexual liberalism because its easier to criticize but ultimately, unless you're the Middle East or Africa and have institutionalized polygamy, all degeneracy stems from the female liberation/independence movement.

As for Roosh V's "reformation." I am happy he has changed. He certainly took his sweet time on changing but I think living a life of degeneracy for so long taught him how empty and joyless the promiscuous lifestyle really is. This happens to a lot of former degenerates and is the main reason why older men tend to be against sexual degeneracy whereas its very difficult to get a lot of young men to be against it... Because they just haven't suffered the consequences of it yet. They look at people who tell them its wrong the same way a child looks at their parent when their parent says not to jump off the roof of the house.

You should check it out. I said the same to MrMan. Most people on the site are Christians with traditional values such as yourself. Not that I'm trying to get rid of you guys lol. I actually value this site for its diversity of opinions etc. Makes things more interesting. That's why I started the thread about Christianity, atheism and spirituality.

I think Roosh has "reformed" because he's too old to carry on the pick up artistry and so now he endeavours to find a Christian wife with traditional values pmsl. I think he's full of it. He had a go at me for not being Christian, but as of yet I haven't been banned lol.

Meh! Not. He has "reformed" because he got cancelled. It has nothing to do with this Western ideological philosophy of being "too old".

[MrMan]

I haven't followed the guy. I read about him. Someone somehow posted how some post of his sounded kind of rapey, with a girl saying 'no, no', then he'd back off, kind of pinning her down, or something like that. I saw a clip of him getting hijacked by a room full of women on a talk show. He acted surprised. No doubt they acted all positive about his new book to get him on the show. It's pretty obvious that is a common ploy on some of these types of talk shows. Then I read about his confession of sin and desire to repent.

Why wouldn't we think he is sincere about this? He built up a big business out of teaching men to fornicate with women. This was unethical. He was not only sinning by fornicating, but encouraging the women he was after to sin also. And then he was teaching men to sin and to entice others. Sex is for marriage. Two shall be one flesh. I don't know if he made it a habit to defile virgins. That's probably a 'long game' for these guys, maybe something they have little patience for. But think if someone went around having sex with women all the time, if condoms are 92% effective, if a man is somewhat fertile how many kids might a man like that have, raised without their father that he didn't provide for or instruct growing up, because of such an irresponsible use of sex.

So why wouldn't he be sincere when he confesses his sin and opposes the type of former behavior he was involved in? Didn't he give up his livelihood,or part of it, over it?

Btw, is he selling any books about this... I can think of a title, how to stop picking up women?