Pixel--Dude wrote: ↑February 7th, 2023, 7:43 am
My current girlfriend was previously a trusted friend of a good decade or more. We already have a lot of trust, which is the foundational principle of any healthy relationship. I'm satisfied that me and her have a healthy enough relationship that point 2 won't be an issue. Therefore point 1 has less of an effect on my anxiety regarding having a child with her. But she's really the only girl I would ever trust to the degree that I do that I would even consider the notion of having another child.
That is great!! I also ardently believe that if you have a girlfriend, whether it starts as an FWB / try-as-you-go kind of thing, that if the romance and passion start escalating, you should be together for at least 2 years before even thinking about getting married.
Your having known each other for even longer and actually still caring about each other sounds even more promising, so I wish you both the best.
Tradcon types with religious programming sometimes cry out against what I said about being together 2+ years before even thinking about getting married, but I think it's just common sense in the absence of the religious indoctrination, because those sexual attraction and love chemicals can be like tropical squalls where they blast two people with love/sex/bonding hormones (oxytocin, for example).............. but then that usually blows over, and often ends up with the primal attraction fizzling out at least a bit (sometimes a lot!), and two people who then realize they have major problems getting along if they're actually trying to go all-in on a serious relationship.
I really like and care about a lot of women I've known since even my early 20s (and still know and occasionally see some of them even from the old days when I go back to the USSA), but if I'd ever been dumb enough to try to marry one of those high-drama man-eaters, I'm sure it would have been a total fiasco, LOL.
(This is especially true for me because I like what they call women with "dominant" personalities, so naturally they're great if you like passionate women with desirable qualities in a mate and who are super-direct communicators, but on the other hand chances are they'll be even harder to handle in a fulltime hodler relationship than women with more submissive personalities.

)
So to me this just makes "FWB" relationships all the more sensible as a starting point, because projecting idealized monogamy/hodler/TMM fantasies onto one woman just because of the way people want things to be in theory almost never works. (Or if I've somehow got that take wrong Outcast9428 and I can straighten it out, I am about to post a new thread on what I thought were the stats on problems in traditional monogamous marriage, but if I'm wrong I'll take it back...)
But that's definitely how I see it: If you're genuine friends with your girlfriends for a long time (as well as enjoying jumping each other's bones), then we've at least stacked the deck in our favor... hopefully.
Pixel--Dude wrote: ↑February 7th, 2023, 7:43 am
I'm not in agreement with having lots and lots of children. Each to their own, but this isn't something for me. I am happy with one child who I can focus all my love and attention on and I don't see the need to have anymore. It's only because I think so highly of my girlfriend that I'm open to having another. But that would be the absolute limit!
So two kids for me. If me and my partner break up for any reason I wouldn't entertain the idea with any other woman and so my kids would be capped at just the one.
That makes sense from your POV!
I don't have the "Viking warrior" wiring of
@MarcosZeitola who just wants to spread his progeny all over the globe, LOL.
But the kicker with me that makes it totally different is that if I had only 1-4 kids, I'd be utterly emotionally devastated if something bad happened to even one of those few kids.
I've already had to bury enough friends and family members (not to mention pets) that it's done enough of a number on my emotions, and I'm not into being an "emo" sissy-man, so I just flat-out don't want to deal with investing 20+ years of trying to raise 1-4 kids only and then feel all !@#$ed up if something terrible happens to one or more of them.
So if it's time for me to start being a breeder, I'm going to go for gold and aim for at least 10+ kids, hopefully more.
(I'd still be emotional if one of 10-20 kids died or got bumped off or wrecked their life, but it wouldn't be the total trainwreck as if I only had 1-4 kids.)
So yeah,
@MarcosZeitola and
@Tsar can repopulate the earth after the vaccines etc kill off half the human population, and we'll all overthrow the international ZOG / NWO, but I'll modestly content myself with building some obscure tribe of a mere 10+ kids of my own.......... or if that doesn't work out, just content myself with wandering around womanizing as a single-handed sailor, with no kids to worry about at all, LOL.
