Poll: Should Cornfed be banned?

[Yohan]

Proposal about the Cornfed problem:
Maybe we should put all of Cornfed's racist and violence supporting threads against blacks in the NSFW section?
.....
even if we did that, there's still the problem that in the Anti-American women rants board...

I don't think this might result in any difference of rating this forum.

It is already misogynist if there are comments about AW are not good marriage material and the US-male should look abroad for a suitable wife/girlfriend - this brings already radical feminists into action, calling this forum a place about how to find an Asian doormat, a site for mail-order-brides sold by her parents who are full of drugs and sold her helpless daughter to an wife beater and similar BS etc.

Cornfed's few comments about black people will not change anything about the reputation of this forum.

Some comments from him are truly racist (ALL black people are animals etc.) and make no sense at all, some other content is fairly true but exaggerated, similar to comments from Mercury.

Some other comments from Cornfed have the only problem, that they are not politically correct by US-standards (2 % of young black people commit 50 percent of all crimes in USA) but I firmly think, he should be allowed to post them.

However which threads of Cornfed are 'violence promoting'?

BTW, easy access for trolls, sockpuppets, spammers etc. is also a reason to rate a site lower ....
and also unsecure internet connection...

You might shut out any visitor, who is NOT registered, if you disable the guest option to prevent any not-registered person to read this forum...
Insist during sign-up that all new members have to register and to post a first comment into the 'Introduce yourself' section etc.

But otherwise Not much what you can do about, except you change the entire forum into a religious web-page - there is a guy who did that...Rooshv - a forum for Christian men... but I hope, you have no intention to do that...

[Winston]

Even if there were not racist or anti-AW posts here, and every post was all politically correct, there's still the problem that Google likes to deflate independent websites and only promote big corporate sites or big social media sites. So that would still bring us down anyway. So there are multiple factors going against this site. Nowadays, Google seems to like to promote big social media sites like LinkediN and Pininterest ahead of others. It doesn't care about quality content, only about big sites and "authoritative content" meaning some big corporation or government agency is behind it. Or big websites that conform to established views like Wikipedia. So even without any taboo content, we'd still be demoted.

[Winston]

Well it looks like according to the poll, most people prefer Cornfed to stay and not be banned.

Anyhow, I've changed the poll to allow revoting. So if you already voted and wish to change your mind about Cornfed, you may do so by casting a different vote above.

[Shemp]

Also posted in the banning announcement thread:

Faithful old CE, always backing up his Massa, just like his house negro ancestors no-doubt looked down on white yeomen going about their business. I wonder if the dogs of rich men have that outlook. The cats surely do, but that is cats being cats, just like CE is a bred slave being a slave.

In case Cornfed is reading this thread, the problem is not the above paragraph per se, since CE is indeed something of an Uncle Tom, finally rewarded with a nice pension after 30 long years of faithful servitude doing the bidding of his masters. Rather, it's that Cornfed doesn't acknowledge that for every 1 black "house nigga", there's 10 whites who are even worse ass kissers, suck-ups, toadies, sycophants, bootlickers, lickspittles, etc. The very richness of the English language to describe these time-serving pension grubbers is testimony to their pervasiveness.

In other words, stop focusing on skin color, which is a trivial superficial bodily characteristic at the level of eye color, or height, or head shape, etc, and focus on character, culture, etc. And stop harping exclusively on inner city Ebonics culture, since this is surely but one of many lower class cultures that you find disgusting.

[Moretorque]

Winston you claim this site is about free speech.... He used to be much more racist actually....

[StanfordGuy]

Lol, he should have been corrected a long time ago. But it's kinda too late now... your forum has been pretty much delisted from Google :/

[Cornfed]

In case Cornfed is reading this thread, the problem is not the above paragraph per se, since CE is indeed something of an Uncle Tom, finally rewarded with a nice pension after 30 long years of faithful servitude doing the bidding of his masters. Rather, it's that Cornfed doesn't acknowledge that for every 1 black "house nigga", there's 10 whites who are even worse ass kissers, suck-ups, toadies, sycophants, bootlickers, lickspittles, etc. The very richness of the English language to describe these time-serving pension grubbers is testimony to their pervasiveness.

Right, and at no point does the post say blacks have an exclusive franchise on being simpering lickspittles like CE. It is not even particularly critical of CE given that licking boot seems to have been a viable life strategy for him and given his mode of cognition it is not like he could have a viable independent philosophical yardstick to measure achievement. Winston is just being a dick.

In other words, stop focusing on skin color, which is a trivial superficial bodily characteristic at the level of eye color, or height, or head shape, etc

I don't know why you insist on making insane leftist statements that you surely must know are untrue. The issue has been studied to death and we all know that blacks in the aggregate have low intelligence, low impulse control, high time preference, limited abstraction ability, different hormone levels etc. all of which makes perfect sense given the particular environmental niche they evolved to fill. Your statement is arguably hateful to blacks given that it implies they are pathologically underperforming in various areas whereas they are just being who they are and doing their best. Such nonsense will get people killed and prevent society from solving the problems caused by blacks and whites living under the same system.

[Shemp]

In other words, stop focusing on skin color, which is a trivial superficial bodily characteristic at the level of eye color, or height, or head shape, etc

I don't know why you insist on making insane leftist statements that you surely must know are untrue. The issue has been studied to death and we all know that blacks in the aggregate

In other words, you are saying the bell curve for blacks is shifted relative to whites. If that is true, then the answer is to cut off the undesirable parts of the curve for all races, possibly meaning a bigger chunk of the black bell curve gets deleted. Of course, there's still the issue of defining white and black, given that most American blacks have some percentage of European ancestry. Ex-President Obama, for example, was half European ancestry, half East African (not west African like most American blacks).

[Cornfed]

In other words, you are saying the bell curve for blacks is shifted relative to whites. If that is true, then the answer is to cut off the undesirable parts of the curve for all races, possibly meaning a bigger chunk of the black bell curve gets deleted. Of course, there's still the issue of defining white and black, given that most American blacks have some percentage of European ancestry. Ex-President Obama, for example, was half European ancestry, half East African (not west African like most American blacks).

Not really. Each race has its own spectrum forming a social dynamic that suits a particular environment. The stupid and uncivilised members of the race may be equally valuable to the smart ones in that environment. The trouble is when incompatible races have to share the same environment. As to defining races, the regime has no such problem when it comes to handing out affirmative action gibs.

[Shemp]

As to defining races, the regime has no such problem when it comes to handing out affirmative action gibs.

Actually, they do have a problem in the USA, since more and more people with just a tiny amount of African ancestry are declaring themselves as black in order to qualify for preferential treatment. I'm not sure if a person with 100% European ancestry can call themselves black because they identify as such, the way men can call themselves women because they identify as the latter, but it's the next step.

Why do the masters allow such foolishness? Because ot keeps the peons fighting amongst themselves. Affirmative action was a Republican idea (President Nixon) precisely because the rich knew it would unite the poor whites under Republican leadership, and thus give the rich an opportunity to vote themselves tax breaks. By mutual tacit agreement, both political parties are now allowing affirmative action to be turned into circus so as distract the masses while the rich are busy robbing the Treasury.

[Cornfed]

As to defining races, the regime has no such problem when it comes to handing out affirmative action gibs.

Actually, they do have a problem in the USA, since more and more people with just a tiny amount of African ancestry are declaring themselves as black in order to qualify for preferential treatment.

Yeah but most of the time the classification is fairly simple and intuitive. Maybe it is hard to define exactly where bulldogs end and bull terriers begin, but to say that makes those invalid categories would be insane.

By mutual tacit agreement, both political parties are now allowing affirmative action to be turned into circus so as distract the masses while the rich are busy robbing the Treasury.

Also it uses low agency types as a barrier to protect the rich from usurpation by the talented poor. But even were that not the case, the presence of blacks would still be causing a problem.

[StanfordGuy]

I don't know why you insist on making insane leftist statements that you surely must know are untrue. The issue has been studied to death and we all know that blacks in the aggregate have low intelligence, low impulse control, high time preference, limited abstraction ability, different hormone levels etc. all of which makes perfect sense given the particular environmental niche they evolved to fill. Your statement is arguably hateful to blacks given that it implies they are pathologically underperforming in various areas whereas they are just being who they are and doing their best. Such nonsense will get people killed and prevent society from solving the problems caused by blacks and whites living under the same system.

Idiocy.

Everything you said has been debunked and why Google has dropped this site from search

https://culturewhiz.org/forum/topic/who ... sh-problem

https://culturewhiz.org/forum/topic/hum ... telligence

https://culturewhiz.org/forum/topic/wha ... eally-mean

https://culturewhiz.org/forum/topic/heritability-iq

https://culturewhiz.org/forum/topic/ext ... ted-autism

https://culturewhiz.org/forum/topic/rk- ... man-beings

[Cornfed]

I don't know why you insist on making insane leftist statements that you surely must know are untrue. The issue has been studied to death and we all know that blacks in the aggregate have low intelligence, low impulse control, high time preference, limited abstraction ability, different hormone levels etc. all of which makes perfect sense given the particular environmental niche they evolved to fill. Your statement is arguably hateful to blacks given that it implies they are pathologically underperforming in various areas whereas they are just being who they are and doing their best. Such nonsense will get people killed and prevent society from solving the problems caused by blacks and whites living under the same system.

Idiocy.

Everything you said has been debunked and why Google has dropped this site from search

https://culturewhiz.org/forum/topic/who ... sh-problem

https://culturewhiz.org/forum/topic/hum ... telligence

https://culturewhiz.org/forum/topic/wha ... eally-mean

https://culturewhiz.org/forum/topic/heritability-iq

https://culturewhiz.org/forum/topic/ext ... ted-autism

https://culturewhiz.org/forum/topic/rk- ... man-beings

The supposed debunking linked to is various forms of obfuscation and strategic nihilism to avoid the impossibility of debating well-established empirical facts. Google would have dropped the site for any number of reasons.

[StanfordGuy]

Like most people, you rely on a simplification of the truth that will make it understandable to you. Your knowledge, then, is essentially a refinement of ignorance --- that you have elevated to established fact. Google agrees with me.

[Kalinago]

Stay!Cornfed is just expressing his views and this is a free speech forum ,right?


Also what he says is mostly correct and he shouldn't be banned for speaking the truth that makes people uncomfortable or clashes with a leftist or Christian kumbaya worldview!

Also he's really funny too!