Is Paul a false prophet? Is Jesus 'YHWH'?

[69ixine]

Yahoshuah would never contradict his father or divinely revealed scripture!Yahawah is one,unique and there is no other God to be worshipped or served ever but the one who the ancient israelites *understood to be God(deut 13:1-10),meaning the FATHER alone is Yahawah(Deut 4:35,32:12,Zechariah 14:9,Isaiah 44:6.psalm 113:5,isaiah 43:11,isaiah 45:5-6)
The word "One"(eHad) in Deuteronomy 6:4 is an adjective, and it describes the proper noun "Yahawah" (SINGULAR), which rules out the possibility of a "compound unity" in this passage. It is an "absolute one."

Yahawah is blasphemed by paulos many times in his writings,as is the (eternal)Law of God through Moshe ha nabi/prophet moses,not surpising since he called himself pharisee even after his conversion,the synagogue of satan that today is the cause of so much corruption on earth.I will just say look at this with an open mind,don't let any hearsay of 'spiritual'experiences in 'churches'determine your truth(Matthew 24 4-6,26-27),have an open mind to God and do not revel in self-righteousness and arrogance when seeking God.
Amen.


https://jesuswordsonly.github.io/recomm ... n7hBzAyaUI

https://exodus2thekingdom.wordpress.com ... et/page/2/

[Cornfed]

It is quite simple. Jesus was a human incarnation of the Creator God. Paul was an apostle charged with spreading the word of God to from ethnic Jews to the world whose writings were instructions for that task.

[69ixine]

It is quite simple. Jesus was a human incarnation of the Creator God. Paul was an apostle charged with spreading the word of God to from ethnic Jews to the world whose writings were instructions for that task.

hosea 11:9 I will not execute the fierceness of Mine anger, I will not return to destroy Ephraim; for I am God, and not man, the Holy One in the midst of thee; and I will not come in a city.

the Father is greater than I” John 14:28

I can of mine own self do nothing: as I hear, I judge: and my judgment is just; because I seek not mine own will, but the will of the Father which hath sent me John 5:30

[Cornfed]

It is quite simple. Jesus was a human incarnation of the Creator God. Paul was an apostle charged with spreading the word of God to from ethnic Jews to the world whose writings were instructions for that task.

hosea 11:9 I will not execute the fierceness of Mine anger, I will not return to destroy Ephraim; ]for I am God, and not man, the Holy One in the midst of thee; and I will not come in a city.

the Father is greater than I” John 14:28

I can of mine own self do nothing:as I hear, I judge: and my judgment is just; because I seek not mine own will, but the will of the Father which hath sent me John 5:30

So what? God is God and He incarnated as a man. Makes perfect sense if you think it through.

[69ixine]

It is quite simple. Jesus was a human incarnation of the Creator God. Paul was an apostle charged with spreading the word of God to from ethnic Jews to the world whose writings were instructions for that task.

hosea 11:9 I will not execute the fierceness of Mine anger, I will not return to destroy Ephraim; for I am God, and not man, the Holy One in the midst of thee; and I will not come in a city.

the Father is greater than I” John 14:28

I can of mine own self do nothing: as I hear, I judge: and my judgment is just; because I seek not mine own will, but the will of the Father which hath sent me John 5:30

So what? God is God and He incarnated as a man. Makes perfect sense if you think it through.

lol you always do this,just ignore everything that's said.

[Cornfed]

It is quite simple. Jesus was a human incarnation of the Creator God. Paul was an apostle charged with spreading the word of God to from ethnic Jews to the world whose writings were instructions for that task.

hosea 11:9 I will not execute the fierceness of Mine anger, I will not return to destroy Ephraim; for I am God, and not man, the Holy One in the midst of thee; and I will not come in a city.

the Father is greater than I” John 14:28

I can of mine own self do nothing: as I hear, I judge: and my judgment is just; because I seek not mine own will, but the will of the Father which hath sent me John 5:30

So what? God is God and He incarnated as a man. Makes perfect sense if you think it through.

lol you always do this,just ignore everything that's said.

I didn't ignore it. The implication is just silly.

[69ixine]

It is quite simple. Jesus was a human incarnation of the Creator God. Paul was an apostle charged with spreading the word of God to from ethnic Jews to the world whose writings were instructions for that task.

hosea 11:9 I will not execute the fierceness of Mine anger, I will not return to destroy Ephraim; for I am God, and not man, the Holy One in the midst of thee; and I will not come in a city.

the Father is greater than I” John 14:28

I can of mine own self do nothing: as I hear, I judge: and my judgment is just; because I seek not mine own will, but the will of the Father which hath sent me John 5:30

So what? God is God and He incarnated as a man. Makes perfect sense if you think it through.

lol you always do this,just ignore everything that's said.

I didn't ignore it. The implication is just silly.

The fear of the Lord is the beginning of knowledge; fools despise wisdom and instruction.Proverbs 1:7

[69ixine]

for an alternative view see this http://www.tektonics.org/af/deltondo.php

it's always good to look at both sides and make up your mind.

[MrMan]

for an alternative view see this http://www.tektonics.org/af/deltondo.php

it's always good to look at both sides and make up your mind.

I don't know why you would take a cartoon walrus' commentary seriously. Listening to a bit of it, what I saw was rather poorly researched set of objections. For example, Jesus taught against calling someone 'moros' in anger. Then it uses the fact that Paul calls the Galatians anoétos-- unmindful, unthinking-- as some kind of condemnation of Paul. A translation might translation both as 'foolish', but these people did not go to the trouble of seeing whether they even used the same word. Jesus, in Matthew, addresses those who taught foolish teaching on getting out of oaths, 'Ye fools and blind'. Jesus' teaching on calling people a fool needs to be understood in the context of expressing anger or hatred toward others.

It says, "Paul taught the abrogation of the law". Where did Paul teach that? He asked, 'Do we then overthrow the law by this faith? By no means! On the contrary, we uphold the law.' (Romans 3:31, ESV.) Paul taught two ways to be righteous. The one way is that there was a righteousness that came through the law-- he that does these things shall live by them. 'Live' in some context in Paul's writings has to do with righteousness. Think if being spiritually alive. A problem with trying to be righteous through the law is that all have sinned, and the law puts a curse on those who do not obey it. So those who are under the law are under a curse. These are people seeking righteousness by the law, rather than by faith.

The other way of being righteous was revealed before the law was given at Sinai in that 'Abraham believed God and it was counted to him for righteousness.' Also, some time after the law was given, Habakkuk received the revelation, 'the just shall live by faith.' The Old Testament also predicted about the Messiah, 'Whoever believes in Him will not be push to shame'. Eternal life through faith in the Lord Jesus is also taught in the book of John, written by an eye-witness of Jesus. Peter also acknowledged it in Acts 15. At the end of the book of Luke, we read how Jesus said that repentance and remission of sin should be preached in the name of the Messiah unto all nations. The Old Testament says 'and in His name shall the Gentiles trust.'

The fact that Israel would go off into idolatry, and also into unbelief is taught in Deuteronomy 32, in the song of Moses. It also says that God would provoke Israel to jealousy by them that are no people, and by a foolish nation He would anger them. But towards the end of it, it says, 'Rejoice, ye Gentiles, with his people.' Paul preached the Gospel to Gentiles and did not require them be circumcised and to take on the obligation to keep the law of Moses, and was quite opposed to that type of conversion to Judaism. Christ is enough to justify Gentiles. The idea that Gentiles could be nations, Gentiles, without converting to Judaism seems to be one of the reasons James quoted from Amos in Acts 15 about the nations on who the Lord's name would be called. They didn't all have to join Israel.

Paul was asked to go into the temple to pay the expenses of some men who had a vow on them, to participate in a temple ritual. He was asked to do so to demonstrate that he wasn't teaching Jews against keeping the law or circumcising their children. Paul had circumcised Timothy, also, the son of a Jewish mother. There is a 'Gentile depiction' of Paul that is not true to the record in Acts. It is conceivable that James and the elders suggested Paul go into the temple with a group of Nazarites because he also had long Nazarite hair. He had shaved his head in Cenchrea, for he had made a vow (Acts 18:18.) If Egyptians still shaved all over at that time, it could be that the centurion in Acts 22 mistook Paul for an Egyptian because he was clean shaven after having turned in his hair to fulfill the Nazarite vow.

Paul taught that if someone was called in circumcision, not to seek to become uncircumcised, and if he was called in uncircumcision, not to seek to become circumcised. Acts 15 indicates that Jewish Christians were following Jewish customs and laws, or seeking to. Paul did not want to put those on the Gentiles. There were Pharisees who wanted to convert Gentiles to Judaism.... the idea that to relate to God one had to do so through the covenant with Moses. Later, Judaism, apart from Christ, would settle on the idea that Gentiles, as descendants of Noah, could live righteous before God as descendants of Noah, who had a covenant with God. These Jews said Gentiles should not eat meat cut off a live animal. Noah was told not to eat meat with the blood in it. In Acts 15, Gentiles are to abstain from things strangled and from blood. Both the Noachide restrictions of Mishnaic-Talmudic Judaism and Acts 15 list some restrictions on Gentiles that are taught and can be inferred from the Old Testament, with the different groups deducing different things, with some overlap that includes restrictions on idolatry and sexual immorality as well as blood.

Paul delivered the Acts 15 decisions to various churches. Acts 15 was likely written after Galatians was written. Some theologians in the 1800's and since were likely mistaken about the dating of Galatians because they did not realize that the borders of Galatia at that time extended down to the coast to include some of Paul and Barnabas' "First Missionary Journey" churches.

Peter also endorsed Paul and his writings in one of his epistles, but says some twisted his writings to their own destruction. Peter was certainly a disciple of the Lord Jesus.

[MrMan]

Yahoshuah would never contradict his father or divinely revealed scripture!Yahawah is one,unique and there is no other God to be worshipped or served ever but the one who the ancient israelites *understood to be God(deut 13:1-10)

I'm not sure if I agree with the 'angel of the LORD' passages being the incarnate Christ. It is a very old belief. Justin Martyr held to it. But just to get perspective, here is a video by Michael Heiser, who just recently passed away. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9s6EBAknNOM

He certainly had a lot of devoted followers online. He's also an ancient near eastern scholar interested in some of the topics you seem interested in.

Also, where do you get this pronunciation for the name of God? When I see a site that uses some funky word like that, its credibility goes down in my eyes as far as OT or Hebrew scholarship is concerned. A lot of 'Hebrew Roots' Americans have invented new theorized pronunciations for the divine name that have no attestation to back them up.