Beatles Conspiracy: Was Paul McCartney replaced by a double in 1966?

[Winston]

In this side by side comparison you can see that Paul and Faul are different. Their voice and accents are very different. Paul on the left had a Liverpool accent and Faul on the right has a Scottish accent. It's as clear as night and day.



In this first interview with Faul in 1966 you can hear his Scottish accent very clearly.

[Winston]

Wow check this out. Paul and Billy shears are asked the same question about their childhood and give totally different answer. You can tell they are different people too. It's not the album clues, it's their physical differences and voice and accent differences too. They are huge and hard evidence.



Also check out this series of a dozen clips where Billy Shears literally ADMITS that he is NOT Paul McCartney. Some are cryptic and some are overt and direct! That's a lot. It's like he is telling us the truth but most don't hear it or see it due to cognitive dissonance!

[Winston]

Wow check out this video comparison and side by side photo comparison of Paul and Faul. You can see that Paul is charming and bashful and humble, whereas Billy Shears is very arrogant and full of himself and has a totally different personality. No question they are not the same guy. It's crystal clear in these clips.

[TruthSeeker]

They do look facially similar. I wonder if they are distant cousins or something.

Usually when you go to one area of a country you will find people who have facially similar features. I am sure they knew each other.

I listened to a Jim Fetzer podcast a few years ago and he speculated they replaced the original Paul with a better Paul. I mean more musically talented.

[TruthSeeker]

@Winston What do you think? Do you think they offed the original Paul? That's a bit extreme isn't it? To kill off a band member to replace him with another.

Then there's the lyric

He blew his mind out in a car. He hadn't noticed that the lights had changed.

Do you think the original Paul was in a car accident and the Beatles were a national treasure so the MI5 arranged Paul's replacement? Sounds too James Bondish

[Winston]

Wow check out this clip where Billy Shears says at a family gathering to a reporter that his family doesn't like him. Obviously the reason is because they know he is not really Paul McCartney right? Keep in mind that Billy Shears never went to Paul McCartney's father's funeral either. Everyone thought that was strange. But if that wasn't even his father because he's not really Paul, then that makes sense.



Also Ringo Starr said in an interview that he's the last remaining Beatle. See below. This means that Billy Shears was not an original Beatle.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/mosliv ... eatle.html

‘You all know that the only person round this table who can go is me. I was in the biggest rock ’n’ roll band in the history of music… I am the last remaining Beatle.’

‘But I think it’s people on the outside who perceive Paul as thinking he’s the only one left. Actually, it’s me. I am the last remaining Beatle.’

[Winston]

They do look facially similar. I wonder if they are distant cousins or something.

Usually when you go to one area of a country you will find people who have facially similar features. I am sure they knew each other.

I listened to a Jim Fetzer podcast a few years ago and he speculated they replaced the original Paul with a better Paul. I mean more musically talented.

But his face is very distinctive. He may have been a twin brother or relative. Cousins don't usually look that much alike. Or he could have had plastic surgery to look like Paul. Or he could be a clone. Who knows.

They are both musically talented. However, Paul had a Liverpool accent and Billy has a Scottish accent and a deeper voice. You will notice this in the interviews above. Paul played the guitar and was comfortable with that, whereas Billy was not comfortable with the guitar and preferred the keyboard. That's why you always see Billy playing with a keyboard at his performances. The original Paul never played on a keyboard. Billy also goes to Scotland a lot and acts like it's his home, whereas Paul is supposed to be from Liverpool.

[Winston]

@Winston What do you think? Do you think they offed the original Paul? That's a bit extreme isn't it? To kill off a band member to replace him with another.

Then there's the lyric

He blew his mind out in a car. He hadn't noticed that the lights had changed.

Do you think the original Paul was in a car accident and the Beatles were a national treasure so the MI5 arranged Paul's replacement? Sounds too James Bondish

They might have offed him or he died in some accident. Or they retired him. The Beatles were a Tavistok project and so they were controlled and never got famous organically.

Keep in mind that two different men played Darren on Bewitched, which they later admitted to. So using multiple people to play a role is common. James Bond has been played by many men, for example.

That song lyric is supposed to refer to someone named Tara Brown or something, who died in a car accident or suicide, if I remember. However songs can have double or triple meanings and layers. So who knows.

Did you see the mockumentary film "The Last Testament of George Harrison"? It's very entertaining. It's not serious and the voice is not George Harrison's voice, but it sounds like him. In it is a confession tape where he explains the gruesome details of what happened to Paul. It's turned into a video that shows stock footage while the confession tape is playing. It is fiction but may contain some truth mixed with fiction. Here it is on YouTube if you haven't seen it. It's very entertaining.