Kevin Annett 15 September 2012 Announcement

[PeterAndrewNolan]

For all those who think I am "crazy" for working for three years to establish peoples courts of common law?

Let me introduce the first in session International Common Law Court of Justice.

CAF and MBA will also hold lawful courts of justice all across the world.

If a father has been criminally victimised and would like a path to justice he has only to join CAF. Cases will be processed in order. We already have 400+ cases in Australia and Ireland so men who join now will be waiting a bit in the queue. But to refuse to join CAF means that the man ALSO waives his right to a jury trial based on "do unto others".

A father who refuses to join CAF is refusing to provide a jury trial for another father and therefore does not deserve one himself. He is on his own.

Similarly? With MBA. If a man refuses to join MBA and therefore refuses to take the position he is OBLIGED to provide jury trials by being a jury member? He also waives any right and any claim to being protected by the rule of law and the benefit of a jury trial.

It is amazing men can not figure out what "do unto others as you would have them do unto you" means.

As Mark Passio postulates...the reason we are there is to learn that simple lesson. Seems men do not want to learn it.....and therefore deserve their criminal victimisation.





http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/fo ... ead=252991

Hello and welcome. My name is Kevin Annett Eagle
Strong Voice and I am speaking to you today on behalf of the Council of Elders
of the International Tribunal into Crimes of Church and State: a multinational
coalition of over fifteen organizations in seven countries.
Under the authority of that Tribunal as well as
Common Law and the Natural Land Law Jurisdiction of Sovereign Nations, I declare
that as of this day, Saturday, September 15, 2012, a Public International Court
of Justice is hereby convened to consider evidence related to charges of crimes
against humanity and criminal conspiracy by institutions of church and state,
and their fiduciary officers.
The crimes that will be documented and judged in our
Court are abominable and almost unimaginable. They span centuries, and range
from outright murder to systematic torture, rape, slave labor, germ warfare,
medical experimentation, drug testing, involuntary sterilizations, child
trafficking, genocide and wars of extermination against peaceful nations. These
crimes are all the more heinous by the fact that they were often aimed at
children and occured not randomly by isolated individuals, but historically,
systematically, deliberately, and officially, by express command of heads of
church and state according to their laws and customs - and by the fact that many
of these crimes carry on today against the innocent at the hands of the same
authorizing institutions and heads of state.
The enormity of these crimes requires a new
approach. For this Court is a unique experiment, in that under existing
international law, institutions cannot be brought to trial or account for
genocidal or criminal actions, despite the fact that these crimes arise from and
are caused by such institutions. There has consequently been no legal recourse
for millions of people whose cultures and lives have been destroyed by the
deliberate plans and actions of institutions of church and state, such as in the
case of the conquest of entire continents of non-Christian people by European
kingdoms operating under the sanction of so-called papal laws.
Similarly, in the case of countless victims of
sexual assault and torture by clergy of catholic and protestant churches,
national courts have continually denied these victims the right to sue these
churches as a whole and restricted their litigation to individual perpetrators,
despite the fact that church laws and policies allow, protect and legitimate
such assaults.
These very restrictions require not only an entirely
new legal approach to the historic wrongs of church and state, if justice is to
be done and seen to be done; but the fact that existing courts refuse to address
the root cause of these crimes by naming the systems respoinsible for them
compels the citizens of all nations to rely on their customary and unalienable
rights to win justice and protect themselves and their children when existing
authorities refuse to do so.
It is in this spirit that our International Common
Law Court of Justice is convened.
Our Court stands upon the precedent of the Nuremburg
Laws and the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, which state
clearly that citizens everywhere have the right and obligation to refuse to obey
or pay taxes to governments or institutions engaged in crimes against humanity.
That is, it is recognized by international law that institutions as well as
individuals can be engaged in criminal actions and can therefore be held
accountable and liable in a court of law.
The purpose of our Common Law Court is to do
precisely that. Our Court has standing under not only the customary right of
citizens to pursue justice and defend their communities, but by our relationship
with the courts of various nations that claim universal jurisdiction over human
rights cases. The evidence presented before our Court will also be filed in
these national courts that do not operate under the authority or legal systems
of the various powers we will be naming as defendants, such as the so-called
Crown of England and its Admiralty laws, or the Vatican and its so-called Canon
laws.
Our Court will be pursuing this course in order to
render an enforceable verdict against churches and states responsible for the
heinous crimes that we will document to the world. Our Court is not a symbolic
gesture but a legitimate legal procedure that will seek the indictment and
imprisonment of guilty parties, the restoration of stolen land, lives and
wealth, and the abolition of institutions responsible for ongoing crimes against
humanity.
With all this in mind, let me begin by explaining
the procedure and protocols of our Common Law Court, and our timetable in the
weeks ahead.
Today's session is part of a normal pre-trial
process, in which the terms of the trial are established, the cases and parties
to the action are named, and a Public Summons is issued by the Prosecutor's
Office to the named defendants. These defendants will be given ten working days
- until October 1, 2012 - to respond in writing to the Summons and agree to a
Pre-trial Conference (often called Voir Dire or Examination for Discovery) in
which evidence can be shared and pleadings heard. If the defendants refuse to
respond, their silence can be deemed to mean they do not contest the charges
made against them, and is often interpreted as a tacit admission of guilt. In
this case, our Court will proceed with the Prosecution's case against the
Defendants in absentia and the formal trial will begin.
This legal process will be overseen by a Panel of
five sworn judges, an Office of Citizen Prosecutors, and a common law jury of
fifty eight Citizen Jurors based in Canada, the United States, Ireland, England,
the Netherlands, Italy, and Australia. All of these participants have as of
today been duly sworn and have taken an oath of confidentiality and service. For
reasons of security and due process, the identity of these judges and jurors
will remain confidential until the day the final verdict of the Court is
pronounced, and the court officers are discharged.
Today, September 15, a Public Summons is being
issued to all of the parties and institutions named in the five cases being
presented by our Court. These parties will have until midnight Greenwich mean
time on Monday, October 1, 2012 to respond to the charges and agree to a
Pre-trial Conference date. After October 1, either that Conference or the trial
itself will proceed, if necessary in absentia.
These events as they occur will be posted the same
day on our tribunal's website, www.itccs.org . Now, in conclusion, allow me to present to all of
you the five cases being brought to trial by our Prosecutor's Office: cases
which summarize the main evidence gathered to prove beyond any reasonable doubt
that the churches, governments and individuals named as defendants are guilty
and indictable for crimes against humanity and a monstrous criminal
conspiracy.Our first case, in the Matter of
Kevin Annett and the People v. the Government of Canada, the
United Church of Canada, the Roman Catholic Church, and the Anglican Church in Canada, and the officers of these churches, the Crown of England and its
officers, the Assembly of First Nations and its officers, the Weyerhauser
logging company and its orfficers, the RCMP "E" Division and its officers, and
the Law Society of British Columbia and its officers.
The Plaintiffs Kevin Annett and the People claim
that the defendants are associated with a centuries-old criminal conspiracy and
crime against humanity authorized by church laws to conquer, enslave, terrorize
and permanently eradicate non-Christian nations and indigenous peoples, and to
deprive these peoples of their identity, livelihood, lands and resources; and
that the same defendants have actively used and are using the medium of their
religion and so-called Indian residential schools to accomplish this conquest
and other crimes which fit the definition of genocide under international law.

The Plaintiffs further claim that these crimes have
caused the death of at least 50,000 children in the residential schools alone,
and many hundreds of thousands of other native people and their offspring.

The Plaintiffs further claim that these crimes
continue to the present day and involve the deliberate targeting and
extermination of indigenous families, children, and land based communities
across Canada; and that these crimes are aided and abetted by officials of the
Crown and private corporations, as well as the media, church officials, the
RCMP, the courts and legal community, and their agents.
The Plaintiffs further claim that this plan to
eradicate native familes is deliberately aimed at traditional female elders and
their lineage, and involves operating child trafficking and pedophile-sex
slavery networks, the murder of native women and children, "snuff" films and
other criminal acts.
The Plaintiffs further claim that the defendants are
actively concealing these crimes and their complicity in them through a
sustained campaign of historical falsification, misinformation, lies,
destruction of evidence and eyewitnesses, obstruction of justice, and other
methods of dissumulation and fraud.
The Plaintiff Kevin Annett further claims that the
defendants did knowingly and with malicious intent enter into an ongoing
criminal conspiracy to intentionally assault and destroy his livelihood,
employability, good name and family in order to conceal evidence of all of these
crimes and especially of their theft and profiting off of land of the Ahousaht
Nation, their defrauding of the public, and their collusion in genocide, rape
and murder of generations of indigenous children across Canada in their
so-called Indian residential schools and Indian hospitals.
In our second case, in the Matter of the People v.
the Government of Canada, the Roman Catholic Church, the Anglican Church in Canada and the United Church of Canada, and the officers of these institutions.

The Plaintiffs claim that the government and named
churches of Canada are deliberately obstructing and subverting justice,
defrauding the public, and concealing their own crimes against humanity by
establishing a self-regulated, restricted inquiry into Indian residential
schools named the "truth and reconciliation commission" that has neither the
mandate nor the legal power to conduct a competent and legally effective
investigation.
The Plantiffs further claim that these named
organizations and persons are deliberately concealing, destroying and subverting
evidence of their own crimes in these schools, silencing eyewitnesses, denying
the latter due process and civil liberties, and are re-traumatizing the latter
with intent to destroy them.
In our third case, in the Matter of the People v.
the Crown of England and the New England Company, the Anglican Church of
Canada, the government of Canada, and the Six Nations Confederacy and its
officers.

The Plaintiffs claim that the defendants are
responsible for the intentional, planned extermination of generations of native
children at the Mohawk Indian residential school in Brantford, Ontario, and for
the deliberate and ongoing concealment and destruction of evidence,
documentation, burial sites and human remains at this school and elsewhere.


The Plaintiffs further claim that these parties
actively conspired and planned ways to destroy the Mohawk Nation in its entirety
through the medium of the same Mohawk Indian school by way of a formal agreement
signed between these parties in 1870.

In the fourth case in our Docket , in the Matter
of the People and Victoria Stewart v. The United Church of Canada and its
officers, the RCMP and its officers, the Estate of Ann Knizky, the government
of Canada and its officers.
The Plaintiffs claim that the defendants killed and
aided and abetted in the killing of Victoria Stewart, age 9, at the United
Church Indian residential school in Edmonton, Alberta, on April 9, 1958.

The Plaintiffs further claim that the defendants
concealed this murder by falsifying records, removing body organs of the
deceased, silencing eyewitnesses to the killing and issuing a false and
fraudulent account of her death; and that this concealment and obstruction of
justice continues.

And in the fifth case
in our Docket, in the Matter of the People v. the
Vatican and its chief executive officers.
The Plaintiffs claim that the defendants are part of
a deliberate international criminal conspiracy and crime against humanity to aid
and abett organized child rape, torture and trafficking within the Roman
Catholic Church, using their position to protect and maintain such crimes.

The Plaintiffs further claim that the defendants
are actively obstructing justice in Italy and internationally according to a
Vatican canon law policy known as Crimen Sollicitationis, which is binding on
all Catholic clergy, and which compels them to engage in the same criminal
conspiracy by protecting and aiding child rapsists within the Catholic church
and concealing these criminals from police and legal authorities.

The evidence regarding these five cases will be
presented by our Prosecutor's Office commencing October 1, in the absence of a
pre-trial conference. That evidence will be posted and available on line in the
course of the trial, as well as being submitted to the fifty eight sworn Citizen
Jurors who will be charged with rendering a final verdict. The world in effect
will be in the court room to hear and consider this evidence of some of the
worst crimes against humanity in history, and to come to its own consensus about
what must be done to end forever the reigh of terror of criminal institutions in
our midst.
In the meantime, please read the background to these
cases and some of the evidence being presented at the website: www.hiddennolonger.com Again, you can follow the progress of our court at
www.itccs.org . Our next broadcast will occur on October 2,
2012. Thank you, and may we close by saying: Let justice be done though the
heavens may fall.