Gratitude, migrant style.

[Teal Lantern]

Video only. No audio.
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=344_1441354394

What do Arab nations know, that Euro nations don't?

Five of the wealthiest Muslim countries have taken no Syrian refugees in at all, arguing that doing so would open them up to the risk of terrorism.

http://www.breitbart.com/london/2015/09 ... terrorism/

[Wolfeye]

Why not engage in a third party cancellation of these benefits? It doesn't really have to come from government consent, just a case of the operative elements not doing their job. Same goes for trying to fire them- it's now jammed because nobody actually does the actions. Like a strike, in a way. Not for nothing, but the government doesn't have an equal say in how things go in a country when they make moves like this. If they feel nullified or harmed in some way, it's their own fault for giving these people a prize for acting like leeches & enemies.

I know it might not be that someone of a darker skin tone does something hostile, but they CAN. When they do that, it is what occurs. It's like they think only whites can be wrong. Especially considering that these people cry "racist" whenever someone says something against someone's actions while that someone has darker skin.

[Ghost]

.

[Cornfed]

Why not engage in a third party cancellation of these benefits? It doesn't really have to come from government consent, just a case of the operative elements not doing their job. Same goes for trying to fire them- it's now jammed because nobody actually does the actions. Like a strike, in a way.

The trouble with that is the welfare system, like most of Western government, is essentially a harem controlled by male traitors at the top with the rank and file workers virtually all female. Females are all morally bankrupt and simply obey the orders of the men in charge, and the men in charge in this case are in on the genocide agenda

[IraqVet2003]

Please check out these links:

VIDEO: ' REFUGEES' THROW ROCKS AT HUNGARIANS, SHOUT "F#%K YOU!"
http://www.infowars.com/video-refugees- ... out-fk-you

VIDEO: MUSLIM "REUGEE" ARRIVING IN EUROPE MAKES ' CUT THROAT ' GESTURE TO TV CAMERA
NEGATIVE IMPACT OF MIGRANTS NOT BEING DISCUSSED BY MEDIA

http://www.infowars.com/video-muslim-re ... tv-carmera

Given these headlines, I wish the E.U. countries particularly the U.K., France, Germany, Austria, and Sweden should have learned the hard lessons from America about allowing an almost unrestricted flow of undocumented "refugees" into their nations. Back in the year 1980, Fidel Castro allowed thousands of so-called "refugees" to leave Cuba. However, many of these folks turned out to be CRIMINALS that Castro wanted to get rid of!!!! Then years later Lou Dobbs once a news anchor of CNN, had reported regularly about illegal immigrants crossing over into America from Mexico. Also, Newsmax magazine would report on OTMs (Other Than Mexicans). Then of course Donald Trump came under fire from the mainstream media for what he said about illegal immigrants. And as far as I'm concerned he was absolutely right!!!! If it were up to me, both America and the E.U. would use commercial airlines under a government contract, naval vessels, cruise ships, along with MILITARY TRANSPORT aircraft such as C-17s, C-130s, Airbus A400s, and An-124s and SHIP THESE REFUGEES AND ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS EITHER BACK TO WHERE THEY CAME FROM OR TO A DIFFERENT MUSLIM COUNTRY (In the case of the Islamic "refugees").
I say this because every country has a right to preserve/protect it's language, culture, and customs. Please don't get me wrong, I'm all for LEGAL immigration and true granting of asylum as well as traveling/tourism (passport and visa), cultural exchanges, and the possibility of expatriating to another country as a Black American man myself (such as Brazil, Chile, Panama, Belize) thus being "HAPPIER ABROAD". However, I hate it when the mainstream media doesn't tell all the ugly facts and tries to be "politically correct" making anyone who is opposed to the flood of illegals or "refugees" as being "selfish", "racist", " intolerant", or "xenophobic". Especially when they show images of children (the U.S. they came from Central America through Mexico) and the dead child on a beach in Turkey (Europe). I just believe that tolerance and respect is a TWO WAY STREET!!! Meaning that these new Muslim immigrants (particularly many Muslim men) must also learn treat European women with respect in regards to their attitudes and dress style. Otherwise, just as the Netherlands once told it's Muslim population if you can't stand the culture than they must leave!!!!

NOTE: It would help that the U.S., NATO, and Gulf Countries (Saudi Arabia, Qatar, U.A.E., etc.) would stop waging wars and supporting radical Muslim rebel groups in the Middle-East (such as in the cases of Libya and Syria) and there wouldn't be a "refugee crisis" in the first place!!!

[Teal Lantern]

... I wish the E.U. countries particularly the U.K., France, Germany, Austria, and Sweden should have learned the hard lessons from America about allowing an almost unrestricted flow of undocumented "refugees" into their nations. Back in the year 1980, Fidel Castro allowed thousands of so-called "refugees" to leave Cuba. However, many of these folks turned out to be CRIMINALS that Castro wanted to get rid of!!!!

They learned what you pointed out deeper in your post, namely, selective reporting of events and shouting down anyone who doesn't follow the party line.
They also have plenty of security and make sure the new arrivals aren't relocated anywhere near themselves.
If Angela Merkel woke up tomorrow and found all the "refugees" had been marched by pitchfork point to her residence, policy would change immediately.

J. Korwin-Mikke speaking (English subs)
Watch the reaction on the faces of the women.

It would help that the U.S., NATO, and Gulf Countries (Saudi Arabia, Qatar, U.A.E., etc.) would stop waging wars and supporting radical Muslim rebel groups in the Middle-East (such as in the cases of Libya and Syria) and there wouldn't be a "refugee crisis" in the first place!!!

But then they wouldn't have the "problem" part of the "problem-reaction-solution".

[Wolfeye]

IraqVet2003: Well said. Got to ask someone that's been there: What is the deal with these people? I know there's probably a lot of variation, but is the whole fascist pervert thing emblematic of them as a group? I guess a soldier might be in a different kind of situation than a civilian in this case- the general civilian doesn't usually have a machine gun in any sense of the word & even simple pistols or long knives can be a problem.

Then again, who really gives a shit what the weapons laws are in these countries? They're going to facilitate a threat & then vitiate efforts of the people to protect themselves? Potentially against groups of people? Is someone really going to bother with all these laws to compensate for different situations than the ones that are actually happening? I doubt it. Not everything has to be a peaceful aquisition, either. I wonder how the tides would turn if the families of the people that enforce these situations were going to be thrown out into the same streets these migrants occupy?

Just throwing ideas around, not trying to shit-talk.

[Banano]

Its only natural for refugees to try to get to western europe wher you get all the benefits. We talked abt human hypergamy in the other thread.

I dont think arrival of syrian refugee will make the situation much worse, europe is already f***ed up as it is. Just take a good look at french and german national soccer teams and you will see that west is finished.

[Wolfeye]

It's not just Syrians- it's also Africans & other Middle Easterners. Not for nothing, but France & Germany shouldn't f**k up the rest of Europe & in this case, I don't think that they have the right to f**k up their own countries- seeing how, in this case, it's f***ing up everyone else's by providing incentives for traveling through them. Really- since when does a German or a French government have THAT much say in their own lives, much less the lives of other people? The French & the Germans seem to not want them there for the most part & are under-represented by these governments. The British, too. The Norwegians & Swedes don't seem to be aligned much differently on that. Same with Italy. Same with Greece.

These migrants come at a time when the countries in Europe can't even afford them, but it's "racist" to make them go away? The other Arabian countries outright said that they don't want these people there. It's fine for them to say so? It's fine for them to not take these people in? It's only wrong if Europe doesn't sacrifice itself for them? Oh, and it's wrong to not sacrifice themselves for those that treat them as enemies- DESPITE the help that they have received from them?! Who the f**k says that? Really? It doesn't matter if whoever says that doesn't ever say anything el

[Break the chains]

I like football here in Australia.

A coach of one of the AFL (Australian Football League) clubs has a favourite saying/philosophy: "We will get what we deserve"

Europe will sadly get what it deserves for its stupidity and PC-inspired paralysis.

Germany, paralysed by its war guilt and dumb, ugly, righteous whore of a leader.
Britain, slowly waking up with a Conservative government but the damage is already done.
Sweden, a liberal paradise about to be overwhelmed by the will of the Koran.

And the other dominoes that will also fall due to membership of the gigantic failure known as the European Union. The strong became the weak through their belief that they were bulletproof and their 'tolerance' would win the world over. How naive.

[Wolfeye]

Break the chains: "Get what it deserves"? I get that these are bad ideas, but lets not call something better than what it is for sake of counterphobic relief. I notice people in Europe don't generally like this situation, it's the government forces that do this. Through whatever mysterious means, they go & get these things do. I don't know who calls who or where all these supplies are, but there IS deliberate action. I figure that is something that works against the people. If these order-followers are really so convinced that their actions are inconsequential, then there's no issue with not doing them.

Really, why would they do these things? Does anyone ask that? Maybe they are worried about disobedience causing problems? Then again, they'd have that same concern with obedience if that were true. Maybe they are in favor of these things & just don't show it on their faces?

I really don't get why the navy isn't just sinking these boats. How hard would it be to place some turret guns at the border? I really think that arming the public shouldn't be out of the question.

[Cornfed]

I really don't get why the navy isn't just sinking these boats. How hard would it be to place some turret guns at the border? I really think that arming the public shouldn't be out of the question.

Finally some common sense on the subject from someone other than me. This is an INVASION that if left unchecked will WIPE OUT the indigenous population of Europe. European militaries should be fighting back with all they have. Anyone opposing this is a TRAITOR of the worst order and must be ruthlessly destroyed. This is your last chance, militaries of Europe. Do the right thing for a change. You are prepared to murder innocent people for Israel and what have you. How about fighting back against subhumans that, without your intervention, will destroy your own societies in your own lifetimes?

[The_Adventurer]

I really don't get why the navy isn't just sinking these boats. How hard would it be to place some turret guns at the border? I really think that arming the public shouldn't be out of the question.

Finally some common sense on the subject from someone other than me. This is an INVASION that if left unchecked will WIPE OUT the indigenous population of Europe. European militaries should be fighting back with all they have. Anyone opposing this is a TRAITOR of the worst order and must be ruthlessly destroyed. This is your last chance, militaries of Europe. Do the right thing for a change. You are prepared to murder innocent people for Israel and what have you. How about fighting back against subhumans that, without your intervention, will destroy your own societies in your own lifetimes?

Maybe it's because there's too many people who say shit like you two that the governments hands are tied needing to appear PC in the international community.

[Cornfed]

Maybe it's because there's too many people who say shit like you two that the governments hands are tied needing to appear PC in the international community.

So they can't fight back because people say they should fight back. Of course if they kowtow to the international community, i.e. the Jews/banksters and whoever is pulling their strings that wish them dead, then they may as well just kill themselves and cut out the intervening unpleasantness.

[Cornfed]

If Europe only allowed in migrants who had a certain level of intelligence, the net outcome would be positive. People may fear Islamization or some of that nonsense, but I say it's a healthy alternative for an abundance of feminists and atheists. Bringing back some traditional patterns that would otherwise be lost.

No, the immigrants would still be outliers who would disrupt things, reduce societal cohesion and add to the general chaos which gives rise to feminism and such.