Happier Abroad Forum Community
Our Message: You Can Transform Your Life and Solve Your Problems by Escaping America for a Better Life & Love Overseas! Discover Friendlier People, Social Connection, Saner Cultures, Lower Cost Living, Healthier Food, Greater Freedoms and More!
http://www.breitbart.com/london/2015/09 ... terrorism/Five of the wealthiest Muslim countries have taken no Syrian refugees in at all, arguing that doing so would open them up to the risk of terrorism.
The trouble with that is the welfare system, like most of Western government, is essentially a harem controlled by male traitors at the top with the rank and file workers virtually all female. Females are all morally bankrupt and simply obey the orders of the men in charge, and the men in charge in this case are in on the genocide agendaWolfeye wrote:Why not engage in a third party cancellation of these benefits? It doesn't really have to come from government consent, just a case of the operative elements not doing their job. Same goes for trying to fire them- it's now jammed because nobody actually does the actions. Like a strike, in a way.
They learned what you pointed out deeper in your post, namely, selective reporting of events and shouting down anyone who doesn't follow the party line.IraqVet2003 wrote:... I wish the E.U. countries particularly the U.K., France, Germany, Austria, and Sweden should have learned the hard lessons from America about allowing an almost unrestricted flow of undocumented "refugees" into their nations. Back in the year 1980, Fidel Castro allowed thousands of so-called "refugees" to leave Cuba. However, many of these folks turned out to be CRIMINALS that Castro wanted to get rid of!!!!
But then they wouldn't have the "problem" part of the "problem-reaction-solution".IraqVet2003 wrote:It would help that the U.S., NATO, and Gulf Countries (Saudi Arabia, Qatar, U.A.E., etc.) would stop waging wars and supporting radical Muslim rebel groups in the Middle-East (such as in the cases of Libya and Syria) and there wouldn't be a "refugee crisis" in the first place!!!
Finally some common sense on the subject from someone other than me. This is an INVASION that if left unchecked will WIPE OUT the indigenous population of Europe. European militaries should be fighting back with all they have. Anyone opposing this is a TRAITOR of the worst order and must be ruthlessly destroyed. This is your last chance, militaries of Europe. Do the right thing for a change. You are prepared to murder innocent people for Israel and what have you. How about fighting back against subhumans that, without your intervention, will destroy your own societies in your own lifetimes?Wolfeye wrote:I really don't get why the navy isn't just sinking these boats. How hard would it be to place some turret guns at the border? I really think that arming the public shouldn't be out of the question.
Wolfeye wrote:
I really don't get why the navy isn't just sinking these boats. How hard would it be to place some turret guns at the border? I really think that arming the public shouldn't be out of the question.
Maybe it's because there's too many people who say shit like you two that the governments hands are tied needing to appear PC in the international community.Cornfed wrote: Finally some common sense on the subject from someone other than me. This is an INVASION that if left unchecked will WIPE OUT the indigenous population of Europe. European militaries should be fighting back with all they have. Anyone opposing this is a TRAITOR of the worst order and must be ruthlessly destroyed. This is your last chance, militaries of Europe. Do the right thing for a change. You are prepared to murder innocent people for Israel and what have you. How about fighting back against subhumans that, without your intervention, will destroy your own societies in your own lifetimes?
So they can't fight back because people say they should fight back.The_Adventurer wrote:Maybe it's because there's too many people who say shit like you two that the governments hands are tied needing to appear PC in the international community.
Of course if they kowtow to the international community, i.e. the Jews/banksters and whoever is pulling their strings that wish them dead, then they may as well just kill themselves and cut out the intervening unpleasantness.No, the immigrants would still be outliers who would disrupt things, reduce societal cohesion and add to the general chaos which gives rise to feminism and such.MarcosZeitola wrote:If Europe only allowed in migrants who had a certain level of intelligence, the net outcome would be positive. People may fear Islamization or some of that nonsense, but I say it's a healthy alternative for an abundance of feminists and atheists. Bringing back some traditional patterns that would otherwise be lost.
