My Rapist Is Still on Campus

[Yohan]

2 cases of false rape allegation, all these idiots who believe a woman every word because she is a woman, should think twice before opening their mouth too much.

These are 2 examples in the recent news, one of a woman with sick fantasy, another one is about a violent wife and adult daughter, accusing the ex-husband of rape. Not sure if he is really the father.

If you need more articles about malicious women accusing innocent men of rape and keeping police investigators busy, let me know.


http://www.tennessean.com/story/news/cr ... /14609517/

CLARKSVILLE, Tenn. – The Clarksville woman who claimed she was raped at Dunbar Cave park earlier this month has been charged with false report.

Kayla Bowen had told police that at 2:23 a.m. on Aug. 5, she went to the park to think, and, after sitting in her car for a couple hours, a man approached her, asked for a light, then beat and raped her.

A Clarksville Police investigation has since uncovered a Craiglist ad Bowen posted titled "Have a deep dark fantasy." In the ad, Bowen said she wanted to be raped and for anyone who responds to say how they would do it and why, according to her arrest warrant.

Her phone records showed she made contact with two people the night she reported the rape. Texts revealed she told the individuals she wanted to be duct-taped, gagged, then sexually assaulted, which would include but not be limited to broken arms, black eyes, a broken nose, fractured ribs and other injuries.

In a text Bowen sent Aug. 4 at 11 p.m., she said she was sitting at Dunbar Cave park in her car and it was a perfect place for the rape, the warrant said. She then texted, "I'm 100 percent consenting to be raped," according to the warrant.

When no one came to the park, she went to an address on Cyprus Court, where she engaged consensual sex and assault resulting in bruises, abrasions, ripped clothes and a chipped tooth, the warrant said.

Bowen, 24, was charged Friday with making a false report and booked into Montgomery County Jail on $50,000 bond.

http://www.tennessean.com/story/news/cr ... /14902789/

Mother, daughter file false rape report against THP officer

A Lewis County mother and daughter were arrested on Friday after investigators accused them of filing a false rape report against a Tennessee Highway Patrol officer, according to the Tennessee Bureau of Investigation.

Authorities said Regina Hobbs, 40, and Kylie Barber, 20, told Hohenwald police that Hobbs had been raped and assaulted by her husband on June 14, according to a TBI release.

Investigators said they later discovered that Hobbs had instead pointed a gun at her husband during a domestic dispute and told officers of the alleged rape after her husband called the police.

Hobbs’ allegations were enough to lead to the arrest of her husband, though the charges against him were later dropped.

Hobbs was charged with aggravated assault and filing a false report when she was arrested on Friday. Barber was also charged with filing a false report.

Both were booked into Lewis County Jail were released on bond on Friday, jail records show.

[Yohan]

Yohan is completely correct.
I will never condone rape or sexual abuse, but I take it with a huge pinch of salt then some western skank talks about being raped. We all know the definition of rape in wstern society is a joke.

Thank you for your comment and your honesty to see the difference between right and wrong.

It is very convenient for a woman to claim to be a victim of a sex-crime if you want to harm any man - either it works out and he is in jail for a crime which never took place - and if police finds out the truth, not much will happen to the false accuser.

In some cases malicious women only claim rape out of fun - without accusing anybody - just for keeping the police busy. In a few countries police has the right to charge these women for wasted police investigation hours, but I doubt if these women ever pay that invoice.

To give you an example what happens if you believe 'raped women' too much.
But in this case it did not work as expected.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... years.html

Full story, link above

Young mother who claimed she was raped by an ex-boyfriend to cover up drunken threesome with two men is jailed for three years

.....it later emerged Mr Hockey had an alibi and could be seen on CCTV on a night out with friends 30 miles away in Hereford.

Yapp, from Ronkswood, Worcester, was found unanimously guilty of perverting the course of justice by making a false statement after a seven-day trial in January.

And today she was jailed for three years at Worcester Crown Court for her ‘deliberate and determined attempt’ to get her former boyfriend arrested.

The court was told how Yapp had a ‘complete disconnection’ with reality and would make complaints to those in authority as often as most people ‘would go to the hairdressers’.
.....
It also emerged she had a history for lying after another of her ex-boyfriends Darren Edwards, 26, told the jury she would often tell ‘major’ lies.

The court also heard that Yapp had previously made an allegation of sex abuse against her step-father when she was just 13.

But she later admitted she had lie...
.....
Thankfully Mr Hockey was not detained for too long and thankfully there was CCTV evidence showing that it could not possibly have been him.

CCTV is a wonderful tool to prove he did not commit the crime - in this case an innocent man was quickly out of jail.

My question - who cares about men who are truly a victim of such a malicious woman?

[Wolfeye]

Jonny Law: Someone being FOUND (declared) innocent doesn't mean shit. Also, being on a liberal campus might simply make things worse. "Oh, that poor boy- he was tempted by her / he had a rough childhood / he's gay & in denial about it." These strike me as arguments that come up a bit frequently in "liberal" disputes.

As far as I see it- that definition that was given of a "White Knight" is actually just a "Doormat." "White Knight," to me, is a guy that is protective without it being only sentiment.

[Yohan]

Someone being FOUND (declared) innocent doesn't mean shit. Also, being on a liberal campus might simply make things worse. "Oh, that poor boy- he was tempted by her / he had a rough childhood / he's gay & in denial about it." These strike me as arguments that come up a bit frequently in "liberal" disputes...

To be considered as innocent as a man and not guilty of raping 3 different women in a feminist-friendly campus environment by the dean of an Western university means for sure something. - Especially if these accusers are unwilling to report their rape experiences to the police and decide to carry instead a mattress around... LOL

Those ridiculous excuses - a bad childhood etc. etc. - are often used by women, much less by men - to justify any wrongdoing, frequently in case of false rape allegation.

We are all responsible as adults for ourselves and our decisions, this includes adult women. It is the preference of the 'white knight' to treat women as children.

There is no proof - and I say it again - there is no proof that this accused man ever raped one of those women.

No DNA, no injuries, no witness, no CCTV - nothing.

I do not know what this man will do now, but I think, he should ask for legal advice, maybe he should file a lawsuit against these women accusing them of slander.

[Jonny Law]

Dear Wolfeye and all other Subhuman Skank Loving White Knight-Manginas,

A man found innocent in a Liberal Feminist Friendly Campus accused by a Feminist. That means he is more than a little F#cking Innocent. It means that he is F#cking Guilty just by being accused and he was Proven Innocent.

You are a Peice of Sh!t... You are the one who is a worthless Magina... You have just shown everyone here who you really are... A worthless subhuman. A sane person would feel shame for behavior like yours. But Skank defending Manginas feel no shame while you insult this man found innocent. Where are his F#cking human rights? You do not give a crap about his human rights because you are subhuman. Your behavior is what makes you subhuman.

Mangina noun- A male feminist, or a male supporter of feminists

White knights noun- males who defend women, but not because women are people – which might be noble. Rather, they defend women only because they are women. This almost always encompasses a willful blindness to the behavior and utterance of the women so defended.

Jonny Law: Someone being FOUND (declared) innocent doesn't mean shit. Also, being on a liberal campus might simply make things worse. "Oh, that poor boy- he was tempted by her / he had a rough childhood / he's gay & in denial about it." These strike me as arguments that come up a bit frequently in "liberal" disputes.

As far as I see it- that definition that was given of a "White Knight" is actually just a "Doormat." "White Knight," to me, is a guy that is protective without it being only sentiment.

[Cornfed]

Even if the slut was raped, why should anyone care? Western sluts deserve to be raped. Sluts go around sexually harassing men by wearing revealing clothing. They give sex to a minority of male dirtbags, while denying it to the majority of decent men and attacking those decent men through the system if they acknowledge the sexual harassment being meted out to them in any way. Suppose I deliberately starved a bunch of dogs and then taunted them by waving steaks in front of their noses, and then wacked them with a stick if they even so much as salivated at the sight of the steaks. Would this not be thought to be outrageous behavior on my part? If the dogs savaged me and ate the steaks I had been waving in front of them, would it not be thought that this was a good thing and that I had got what I deserved? Sluts are depraved and sadistic criminals that are destroying society. There is no penalty severe enough for them, lest of all taking one more penis than they expected.

[Yohan]

http://time.com/99780/campus-sexual-ass ... sulkowicz/

.....We all reported our cases, and all three were dismissed.

During my hearing, which didn’t take place until seven months after the incident, one panelist kept asking me how it was physically possible for anal rape to happen. I was put in the horrible position of trying to educate her and explain how this terrible thing happened to me.

I also had to watch my rapist give his testimony on a television in another room. It’s that feeling where your stomach drops. Not only was he lying, but he was also making up these entire fantasy stories of sex that we’d had.
.....

Ultimately they decided he wasn’t guilty. I appealed, but appeals go to the dean who basically has the autonomy to make the final decision for every case of sexual assault on campus. That’s not right. They either must find a disinterested party or they should train him because he hasn’t been trained to know to deal with survivors.

I hope you misogynists on this forum, don't go on blaming this women for getting raped...

Let me write a summery of this case as I see it. I strongly doubt if this story is true and I am not sure if this is not a setup to get rid of a former boyfriend, all what I read here it's like a case of revenge.

It is misandristic behavior to presume the man to be guilty in case of sex-crimes until proven innocent.

It is not misogynistic to refuse to believe a controversial and contradictory story with the sole argument it must be true because it was told to us by 3 females.

In a university are 100s or 1000s of people coming and going, and how come that 3 women meet accidentally and discussing their rape experiences of one single man?

These 3 women were questioned, one by one, and one of these panelists investigating was clearly a woman.
The result: all 3 cases dismissed.

Appeal to the dean, and again, all 3 cases dismissed.

It is very strange that these 3 women did not report their rapes to the police.

It is interesting to read that especially the female panelist is accused to ask 'too much' but it is a proven fact, that females investigating sex-crimes as police investigators and in court as judges and prosecutors are not much impressed by tearmaking stories regarding sex-crimes from females and are acting very mistrusting.

About the accused man, guilty or innocent, the accused person and his legal defense council have the right to lie.

It is up to the accuser who has to prove beyond reasonable doubt, that the accused person is guilty. If the accuser is unable to do so, and there is no sufficient proof that this crime happened, the case will be dismissed.

Not even one of these 3 women convinced the internal commission that their stories are true and a rape took place within the university.

It is correct to say, this internal investigation was carried out by not experienced staff within the university. As response, instead to ask police to investigate, to carry a mattress around and to demand a certain man should be expelled from the campus is really ridiculous.

I wonder if zboy1 has any comment.

[Yohan]

Even if the slut was raped, why should anyone care? Western sluts deserve to be raped. Sluts go around sexually harassing men by wearing revealing clothing. They give sex to a minority of male dirtbags, while denying it to the majority of decent men...

Nobody 'deserves' to be raped or to be robbed at gunpoint etc. - simply said, nobody deserves to become a victim of a crime.

However if you show up with a certain behavior, you might considerably increase or reduce the risk to become a victim of crimes.

It's not only about sex-crimes.

Insurance companies keep the victim of a crime often responsible for their behavior, for example if you leave your house and windows and door are open and you find it empty after a while when coming back home because of burglary, the insurance will refuse to compensate you.

Same can be said about car theft, if you keep the motor running, key inside ready to drive away in a busy street and you come back from shopping after a while and the car is gone, no insurance will compensate you, because you were acting irresponsible. Your car has to be locked during parking when nobody is inside.

Nobody has the right to rob you, but if you walk around with a transparent envelope with cash in a high crime area, your risk to be robbed is significantly higher than if you keep your money in a banking account and pay only by credit card.

Of course, for a woman and rape it's about the same. If a woman walks around late night, alone, dressed up as a slut, asks for money, talking sex-BS with drunken men in front of a bar with thugs, is full of drugs and alcohol ... the risk that something might happen to her is much higher than with a woman who going home after work, is sober and is rejecting sex with unknown men.

It's about common sense and about crime prevention.

[Cornfed]

Even if the slut was raped, why should anyone care? Western sluts deserve to be raped. Sluts go around sexually harassing men by wearing revealing clothing. They give sex to a minority of male dirtbags, while denying it to the majority of decent men...

Nobody 'deserves' to be raped

Why not exactly? If they are going to harm the whole of society, why should members of that society not fight back? Anyway, since they are of no value as wives or even hoes, are not under the protection of a husband or father and are of no real use as people, who is the aggrieved party? Using them would be like picking up shells from the beach.

[Cornfed]

Here is the return of kings article about this stupid attention-whoring bitch.
http://www.returnofkings.com/43097/fema ... s-raped-on

[Yohan]

Here is the return of kings article about this stupid attention-whoring bitch.
http://www.returnofkings.com/43097/fema ... s-raped-on

Thanks for the link, nice report and nice follow-up comments.

Interesting to read that even the police did not believe her a single word. Interesting too is the fact, that the other 2 women who are claiming they were raped too by the same man are not mentioned at all.

To file a false police report might turn out to be a punishable offence, but to carry a mattress around is more for attention seeking... It seems the other 2 women neither want to report to the police nor do they like the idea to walk around with a mattress. LOL

[Wolfeye]

Jonny Law: You seem to really like the term "mangina," I've noticed. Maybe you like the mental picture of a man with a twat? Well, you being or not being a fag aside, I didn't say this f***ing guy was guilty- only that the method of response is bullshit. It's a major conflict of interest if the dean decides whether rape cases will be reported or not & make the school look bad. This f***ing guy has no say at all in whether or not someone seeks out legal recourse, with anything.

Cornfed: You're f***ed-up! A guy getting a stiffy from tormenting someone is pretty twisted on it's own & you figure someone deserves to get violated because someone gets turned-on by looking at them? By that logic, if an aggressive fag got all riled-up looking at your ass, he's in the right for sticking his dick in it of his own accord. Don't know if your mother got bossy with the strapon on you at some point or what, but you're out there & not in a good way.

Christ's balls! Is it so hard to believe that someone would actually do something like this? I mean, for f**k's sake this guy shows up in her class after being accused of rape BY her & that doesn't strike anyone else as a taunt?

I get how the whole carrying a mattress thing is a bit odd, but there have been people that literally set themselves of fire to protest wars! Ostentatious shit DOES tend to draw attention & that might be what she's driven to do. She might very well have been attacked & want to draw attention to the fact of it. If she's got a little bit of a T.V. shock-drama style to it, what do you expect? That's a lot of what's around as far as input goes.

I don't know the actual stories with these cases & it does happen that women outright make shit up, I just don't think them being college girls makes it false or deserved. I get that even sometimes there's designating sex she regrets for whatever reason as an attack, but not wanting it after the fact is not the same thing as it being imposed. I get that sometimes the real thing happens & she starts calling rape on everyone, just to make someone f***ing pay- also a major wrongdoing. It's not that men don't have rights, but in this case the school seems to have hamstrung the response to the situation. This school might just so happen to want to look like it's safe for women, since you've all made the point that it's an ultra-liberal/feminist academy. Is it really that much of a stretch to believe that they wanted to "protect their income"?

[jtest28]

I don't condone rape, I just simply don't care either way. Its simply a natural act that's been forced. Big deal. Not much different than regular assault. Like regular assault, it should be illegal, but not no 6 years in the pen type illegal.

[Yohan]

..... Is it so hard to believe that someone would actually do something like this? I mean, for f**k's sake this guy shows up in her class after being accused of rape BY her & that doesn't strike anyone else as a taunt?

Yes, he was accused of rape by a female student, but this female student cannot prove what she says. No evidence at all that a rape took place.

What should the university and the police do now by your opinion?

Her actions are more likely a case of revenge, a false rape allegation - maybe angry because her boyfriend left her or insulted her or whatever.

No evidence of any rape was found and there is no proof like DNA, injuries, witnesses - just nothing.

Why should he not show up in her(?) class. It is not HER class. She has no priority rights there. She is not the teacher. She is just a student as all the others. She has no right to order him to leave the class room. She might ask an authorized person to order him out of the room, but it seems she did not even try that.

There is no reason for him to be in hiding. He was cleared 3 times!

He is considered as innocent by the internal investigation, followed by appeal and cleared again by the dean, and finally the police too rejected her rape-story. There must be a reason why no investigator believes her!

To carry finally a mattress around and to insist a certain male student must be expelled, despite he was cleared of her accusations and found innocent by the internal investigation, by the appeal and finally even by the police, is totally ridiculous.

Why should he leave? Out of what reason? Because he was accused but found innocent?

I can only recommend that this woman is leaving this university and ask for enrollment somewhere else.
This will be the best solution for all.

[fschmidt]

If she doesn't want to be raped she shouldn't dress slutishly. The only rational purpose of dressing slutishly is to attract promiscuous men and cause them to act impulsively, and when sluts succeed in this we are supposed to see them as victims? Freaking ridiculous.

Of course I agree. Based on how she dressed, she deserved to be raped.

Rape is not a Western value.

Actually, during the Renaissance it was common for groups of men to rape improperly dressed women as a way of keeping women in check. I can find references to this if you are interested.