6-year-old suspended for "sexual harassment"

[Falcon]

This just happened in Colorado Springs, Colorado, USA: A toddler kisses a girl on the hand and gets suspended and accused of sexual harassment. It was completely consensual as well.

I have a a feeling he's gonna end up like many of us HA guys when he grows up.

What has America come to these days?

6-year-old suspended for kissing girl, accused of sexual harassment
http://edition.cnn.com/2013/12/11/livin ... index.html

[Ghost]

.

[OutWest]

This is a new low, even for liberals. What a disgrace for humanity. This shit will keep happening until bad things start happening to the enforcers of this misery. Simply stating a fact.

Yes...homegrown leftist idiots that have pretty well taken over the educational system.
They will only stop when they fear for their lives- so as the days of civil society draw to a close,
their days might be numbered...IF the population ever tires of the leftist parasite class enough
to rise up against them.

[OutWest]

This just happened in Colorado Springs, Colorado, USA: A toddler kisses a girl on the hand and gets suspended and accused of sexual harassment. It was completely consensual as well.

I have a a feeling he's gonna end up like many of us HA guys when he grows up.

What has America come to these days?

6-year-old suspended for kissing girl, accused of sexual harassment
http://edition.cnn.com/2013/12/11/livin ... index.html

Note the last name hyphenated feminist cunt who says the school "did the right thing." No doubt
an Obamaton zombie.

[Falcon]

Cheers! The school has finally backed off due to all the negative publicity. This is why it's important to voice your opinion.

School drops sexual harassment claim against 6-year-old who kissed girl
http://edition.cnn.com/2013/12/12/us/si ... uspension/

[gsjackson]

This is a new low, even for liberals. What a disgrace for humanity. This shit will keep happening until bad things start happening to the enforcers of this misery. Simply stating a fact.

Yes...homegrown leftist idiots that have pretty well taken over the educational system.
They will only stop when they fear for their lives- so as the days of civil society draw to a close,
their days might be numbered...IF the population ever tires of the leftist parasite class enough
to rise up against them.

The pathology of feminist PC enforcement and war making on males has little to do with either liberalism (traditionally defined as emphasizing individual liberties as against the claims of the state) or leftism (concerned with a more equitable distribution of property rights). It is an entirely separate phenomenon. Most of the PC enforcers are fully enmeshed into consumer society and have no gripes with free market economies. They don't even think about economics. And self-evidently, they are neo-puritans who have no brief for individual liberty. They are mostly apolitical power grabbers.

I think it's important to keep the categories straight, if we're ever going to have a less dumbed down discourse about public policy in the US.

[quito]

a couple years ago my 6 year old daughter was sent home from public school for kissing a boy on the cheek in class.. i asked her what it was all about and she said she just wanted that boy to know that she liked him. he didnt complain but the teacher saw it.

[OutWest]

This is a new low, even for liberals. What a disgrace for humanity. This shit will keep happening until bad things start happening to the enforcers of this misery. Simply stating a fact.

Yes...homegrown leftist idiots that have pretty well taken over the educational system.
They will only stop when they fear for their lives- so as the days of civil society draw to a close,
their days might be numbered...IF the population ever tires of the leftist parasite class enough
to rise up against them.

The pathology of feminist PC enforcement and war making on males has little to do with either liberalism (traditionally defined as emphasizing individual liberties as against the claims of the state) or leftism (concerned with a more equitable distribution of property rights). It is an entirely separate phenomenon. Most of the PC enforcers are fully enmeshed into consumer society and have no gripes with free market economies. They don't even think about economics. And self-evidently, they are neo-puritans who have no brief for individual liberty. They are mostly apolitical power grabbers.

I think it's important to keep the categories straight, if we're ever going to have a less dumbed down discourse about public policy in the US.

Your categorizing is incredible. What country have you been living in.? Seriously.
An old style liberal was concerned about individual freedom. How many of those are left? 12?
You cannot be an observer of current US politics and somehow conclude that those under the
current banner of liberalism give a rat's ass about individual freedom.

>>>The vast majority of what now passes for "Liberalism" is a totalitarian vision
wherein every detail of life (including a 6 year old's naughty boy episodes) is subject
to the supreme power of the nanny state. The current president certainly fits this mold.
As such, the episode with the 6 year old boy, totally fits that mold...it is NOT a bunch of Puritans
who have lost their way...lol. That is just silly.

Modern liberalism is all about the supreme power of the state. Modern liberalism is the ENEMY
of individual freedom, not it's champion!

A very telling event in recent history took place when Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan's
senate seat was taken by Hillary Clinton. A grand old REAL liberal, a wordsmith and
a statesman, was replaced by this vile statist sociopath degenerate named Hilary Clinton.
Imagine, this vile clam actually thinks she is presidential material and it is likely to meet with
approval by the vast majority of "liberals".

The vision of liberalism as Champions of Freedom is a Rip Van Winkle vision. If one formed impressions 40 years ago and woke up today...imagining at first that old Liberalism was still
the order of the day.


Outwest


Outwest

[gsjackson]

I'm simply giving you the definition of liberalism, which will be confirmed in any political science department in the world. Liberals started to become conflated with statists during the New Deal, hence the misuse of the term for a few decades now.

Categories today are not nearly so clearly demarcated as you suppose. I'll agree with the "sociopath degenerate" part about Hillary Clinton, but a statist? She and her husband (who famously declared the era of big government is over), deregulated the financial sector, presenting us with the myriad problems we have today. They deregulated the public airwaves to a substantial degree, handing control of them over completely to commercial monopolies. They did their best to get government out of the welfare business. Her proposed health care reform, like Obamacare, far from putting government in control, essentially ensconced private, for-profit insurance companies at the heart of the system. I could go on and on. Where's the "statist" part in the signature accomplishments and stated positions of her and her husband?

Flung about indiscriminately, these terms such as "liberal" just confuse, and suggest an ideological component that our politics does not have. We have two corporate parties, and they both serve their paymasters diligently. Sorry, but liberal versus conservative is a completely meaningless discourse now that doesn't reference our current reality in any way.

[OutWest]

I'm simply giving you the definition of liberalism, which will be confirmed in any political science department in the world. Liberals started to become conflated with statists during the New Deal, hence the misuse of the term for a few decades now.

Categories today are not nearly so clearly demarcated as you suppose. I'll agree with the "sociopath degenerate" part about Hillary Clinton, but a statist? She and her husband (who famously declared the era of big government is over), deregulated the financial sector, presenting us with the myriad problems we have today. They deregulated the public airwaves to a substantial degree, handing control of them over completely to commercial monopolies. They did their best to get government out of the welfare business. Her proposed health care reform, like Obamacare, far from putting government in control, essentially ensconced private, for-profit insurance companies at the heart of the system. I could go on and on. Where's the "statist" part in the signature accomplishments and stated positions of her and her husband?

Flung about indiscriminately, these terms such as "liberal" just confuse, and suggest an ideological component that our politics does not have. We have two corporate parties, and they both serve their paymasters diligently. Sorry, but liberal versus conservative is a completely meaningless discourse now that doesn't reference our current reality in any way.

Thanks for making my point- that self-identified "liberals" in the USA are largely statists in their beliefs. While terms now are near meaningless...only an argument about what flavor of sauce the goose will be cooked in. Yes, the emerging nanny state is quite related our little episode in Colorado.

There are very few on the left or right that are liberty oriented. Christopher Hitchens (RIP)
as an exception as is "conservative" Bob Barr. Most simply want to usurp the power of the state
for their own ends.

Hillary Clinton was not the President. She simply tolerated Bill as her path to power at any cost.
Unlike her husband, and much like most American women, she will always espouse the power of the
state in all things. If she has her own time in the White House, it will be far different than the White House under Bill Clinton. Bill Clinton will always be a true southern Bubba at heart.

I suspect you and I likely agree on most points...the rest is syntax.

[Greetercb]

First Of all If Russia Still Have The Czar On its Throne Like Before & If I Were The would Have Been Present Czar Of Russia. I would Have Invited The 6 year Old Boy & His Family to Russia As My Guests. ( In the Same Way That a young Girl was Invited to The Former
USSR Back In 1984 by Andrei Yaprvov or Whatever His Name was.) Even Though She was Killed
in a Accident a few Months Later.

But In My Case as a Would Have Been Present Czar of Russia it will Be for Good.

Have Him & His Family Visit Russia & Have That Little Tyke see For Himself how Russian Girls
Are Kinder & Nicer Than American bitches Anytime.

Then He & His Family returns To The U.S.S.A Then When That little Tyke Becomes a Future Grownup Then He will return To Russia as a Foreign Exchange Student From U.S.S.A & Met & Marry
his Future Russian Wife & Stay Permantly at Russia. All Under My Invitation as The Would Have Been Present Czar of Russia.