Would You Prefer A Civil War Or WWIII?

[Taco]

Obama has fired over 200 military officers since 2009, that happened for a reason. Leave the US while you still can.

Would You Prefer A Civil War Or WWIII?
http://thecommonsenseshow.com/2014/01/0 ... war-three/

14 Governors Prepare State Militia Forces
http://www.conservativeinfidel.com/unca ... al-forces/

[Ghost]

.

[Teal Lantern]

Obama has fired over 200 military officers since 2009, that happened for a reason. Leave the US while you still can.

Do you expect them to lock the door, Sonny-in-Bronx-Tale-style and be like
"Now, youse can't leave." ?

[fschmidt]

The sad thing to remember about revolutions is that they always come out of the established order. There's some part of the current ruling elite that will splinter off when things deteriorate enough and that faction will have a portion of the military that goes with it. There is no such thing as the people rising up for liberty.

There have been populist movements, but they always get highjacked. This is an interesting book on the subject:



The only way to prevent this is to keep a movement small, without enough power to attract the wrong people.

[tre]

If you believe that powerful elites are running things, I don't see how WWIII would even be a logical option. Why would they bomb land that they view as being their own land? Why not let an economic collapse and civil war decrease the overall population? It seems like a much easier way to go for them, it really would go auto-pilot...

I feel the hatred and anger building up quickly and progressively as the Elitist owned media brainwashes both political sides and builds racial tensions at the same time. The USA is RIPE for destruction, the Elites just gotta pull the plug, sit back and watch...