Yohan wrote:All what I read here by argaluza is troll-posting.
I doubt if a person who post crap like this has ever been in Japan - even if it is only for a short visit. I also noticed argaluza is considering Indonesia as a shithole of poverty, while remaining silent about China.
I have been to Japan, nice place
on the surface but I wouldn't bring my daughters up in a place where there is still a cultural phenomenon with paedophilia amongst middle aged men for teenaged schoolgirls, sorry if you think I am rude in bringing this up but it would be the
last place I would bring up girls.
China, there are cities that are as modern as any in Japan whilst they have pockets of poverty in places like Henan and the west. You can't compare a nation continent with 1.5 billion people to Japan, China has come a long way in just under 20 years with the reforms of 1997. In 20 years from now China will wipe the floor with Japan in regards standard of living for the average.
I have never seen Japanese poor oppressed women lining up to move to China, but there are millions of Chinese men and women who would prefer to live in Japan or otherwise overseas if they could do so.
Chinese people have always emigrated to other lands. There are Chinese populations everywhere. There are 5 million Brits living abroad, what does that prove? The UK is not a first world country?
About these so-called poor oppressed women in Japan, I invite argaluzo to visit a few expensive Japanese department stores and to check out all these products for women, brand articles, from ladies fashion, shoes, cosmeticas, handbags, pearls and other jewelry, cute cars and healthy foods. Who pays for this all? 80 percent of the floor space is full with merchandise for women, 20 percent or less for men.
It proves nothing, there are handbags and perfumes galore in the biggest malls in Riyadh. What does that prove? Saudi Arabia is a good place for women?
It is quite interesting to hear the argument of argaluza that men need money for dating Western women, but Western women need not to provide anything. This is a strange way of equality, one only gives and the other only takes. Sounds not like dating, but more to be p4p to me. - It is always said, men should not earn more than women doing the same work - so from where should men find so much money for dating Western women, buying them gifts, inviting them for expensive dinners and travels to entertain them?
If you like it or you don't, attractive white women are at a premium whereas average white men aren't. An attractive white woman has plenty of dating options and she will lean towards the better prospects who usually have money, it is just how it is - the reason why Hank from Iowa can get a girl half his age in Cebu is because his prospects are better than Miguel the local Mechanic who earns 10 dollars a day. Rich Arab men used to come to London and pay thousands to f**k Page 3 girls in the late 80's and early 90's. Those parties were never open to the like of us - we were never in the races in getting those kinds of women in the first place, you blame feminism but the facts are the game is the game all over the world, the only thing is, you were never in the game in your own country because
you never had what it took. But of course, it takes less money to get in on the game in Cebu or Pattaya.
Now, I know there are lots of ordinary couples, ordinary men and women who are dating each other in every country in the world, not everyone needs to escape their own country for a love life. Not every relationship is based on exploitation and to state that these ordinary people with normal relationships are based on feminist exploitation is absurd.
So far argaluza failed to provide even a single argument, why a Western man should consider to marry a woman in a Western country. While a woman gets everything, marriage is a no-win position for the man.
Culture, knowledge of language and customs which promotes harmony. I still love the company of British women, a lot of them are great company.
The best solution is not to have anything to do with Western women and their manginas, no question about that, and this is one major reason why this forum exists.
No it isn't. It is to be happier abroad, you sound very unhappy to me.
Argaluza talks about male virgins, but not about female virgins. Why should a sexual poorly experienced man look out for a date with a Western woman who is changing her boyfriends every month?
Well, why not, beggars cannot be choosers, the white male isn't of the premium of the white female where even the most average looking women are not short of offers. Life i not fair, I know go and tell it to your sensei or whoever.
How can I be interested in equality for women? Women have many options, men have not.
Oh please, have a good look at who is running your country the next time?
It is becoming absolutely clear you are not a high quality white man, you are probably working class, average looking, no discernible talents with average intellect - now high quality white men who are above average looking, are talented in some way and have a high level of intellect and achievement have
no problems getting dates. Check out how many lonely professional sportsmen, surgeons or high flying lawyers are on match.com?
And don't think I am getting at you because I am the same, average looking, no discernible talents, little in the way of major achievements - I don't expect quality white women to drop their panties on my say so. I have grown up and got over it.
A good example is retirement allowance. Men in my native EU-country retire with 65, women with 60, men will die when 77 and women when 83. It's a big difference if you are retired for 12 years or retired for 23 years.
Why do women need to retire earlier, because there are more of them and most of them aren't in management positions therefore the lower age frees up a lot of jobs.
Healthcare for women does not only include birth, it includes abortion as well and even breast enlargement. Ridiculous to argue women need more money for healthcare. Is birth an illness, is abortion a medical urgently required treatment, why is is a breast enlargement paid by healthcare, why do I have to pay for the dentist, but a pregnant woman gets all dental work for free, even if she decides later to prefer abortion.
How much public money gets paid for breast enlargement and abortions? (most are done privately) I don't care what women do with their own money but I will bet those two surgical procedures are a tiny sliver of public health money.
Just some few reasons, why I am interested in equality for men, and not for women. I could continue about father's rights, paternity fraud and so on and so on.
It isn't - it is because you are a selfish me me me bastard.
What an idiotic comment and I wonder if you are not ashamed to write something like that.
I have to make idiotic comments for idiots like you - sorry you found it lowbrow.
My 2 daughters are already adults and university educated, and my fostergirl is also now an adult and still studying in the university - and who, do you think, paid and still pays for their education?
Ah right, so your daughters went to university and are working? Not chained at home married to a chauvinist like you? I see you mean other peoples daughters need to take up the mantle of anti-feminism - not yours? Why aren't they knitting and cooking and being subservient to someone like Winston Wu? Who can then go and get them pregnated whilst barefoot so he can run off and f**k more whores? That is what it is all about right?
It is more about that I cater with my many working hours over decades for them, sharing my income with my family - do you know how much university education costs in Japan and in Canada? At least, unlike feminists, my 2 daughters, my fosterchild and my wife are all good women who are thankful to their father and husband and appreciate what I have done for them and still doing for them if they need my help. They do not need to 'cater for my needs' and they do not need your sympathies for sure.
It looks like they don't because it looks like they have took the feminism mantle for themselves and making their own way into the world with an education. Does that make you a hypocrite to your beliefs? I think it does.
