Pixel--Dude wrote: ↑October 10th, 2022, 6:21 am
Yeah no worries, buddy. Just reply when you can. I also think the bible has clues about alien origins and humanity being created by a pantheon of gods and goddesses rather than a so-called all powerful god. For starters there is a slip up in the book of Genesis where it says “Let US make man in OUR image” but this Jewish book is a plagiarism of the Sumerian myth anyway and in that myth it is Enki (also slandered as the biblical serpent) who suggests to his father and brother that they create humanity by using the essence of the primal hominids that were the native species and the blood of a god, to give humanity the capacity for reason. So that we could follow complex instructions.
Why would you think that is a 'slip up?' As a Christian, I see that from a trinitarian perspective. At least the Logos was involved in the creation. I have also heard non-Christian interpretations, such as God addressing the divine council or angels in the royal plural.
We should also consider that the Biblical authors and readers knew what knowledge was floating around about the spirit-world and the Mesopotamian interpretations of it. There other other elim or elohim mentioned in the Bible besides the creator. There is also the term b'nei Elohim, the 'sons of God.' The dead sea scrolls (c.f. LXX) manuscripts of Deuteronomy 32 say the LORD divided the nations according to the number of the sons of God. That may refer to YHWH giving these spiritual entities guardianship over other nations besides Israel, and retaining Israel as an inheritance/portion, at least for a time. Though in Psalm 82, God judges the elohim for their not doing justice and decrees that He will inherit the nations. He also offers the nations to the Messiah.
I recall reading in a book by Don Richardson about how various cultures and peoples actually have a concept of the Most High God, even if they worship other entities. There was one, the Karen in Bhurma, I think, that believed that God named Yawa created man and woman and put them in a garden, and they sinned. Based on the words of their prophet or prophets, they were waiting for a white an with a black book to tell them how to be reconciled with the Most High God, while they wore bracelets on their wrists to indicate that they were in bondage to the gnats/demons. There was eventually a mass conversion of the people group when they encountered the son of a blond Swedish missionary couple. One of their prophets told his disciples to follow a donkey to find the man they had been waiting for. It stopped at a hole in the ground. Out popped a blond Swede who was digging a well.
Back to the Bible, the Deuteronomy 6 passage and other passages indicate the sons of God cohabitating with human women was a bad thing. A lot of the Mesopotamian literature, and Greek also, present it in a positive light-- Gilgamesh, for example, or Hercules.
You might be interested in reading or watching material from Michael Heiser. He's an author-- both Ancient Near East/Old Testament type studies, and also alien-science fiction. He goes to ancient alien type conferences. But he has a PhD from the University of Wisconsin-Madison. So he has studied a lot of this Mesopotamian literature, along with Biblical and intertestamental literature, and he focuses on some of the same things you are discussing. Here is an ]interviewwith him I found with a quick search: [youtube]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TJt-vJr6Sog.[/youtube] I seem to recall his saying that Ancient Aliens did a 'hit job' on him once, so he may have been in a clip on that show, presented in a negative light. He has shown some flaws in one of their author's arguments, from a scholarly perspective, so maybe they don't like him for that reason. Ancient Aliens is an entertainment show, after all, rather than a scholarly type show.
For the most part though their information is pretty interesting. It puzzles me how people like MrMan seem to think any notion of alien life creating civilization, religions or humans themselves, is derived solely from this TV show and science fiction movies when anyone can look into this stuff for themselves.
I haven't watched that much of it. Just enough to turn me off. It's a conspiracy theory style approach to the topic... huge irrational leaps and conclusions. I don't care for it. You can look at the debunking video for an example illustrating some of the problems with the approach the show takes.
I don't see any reason to think that entities from the spirit-realm are actually little physical green reptile men, or giant eyeballs with tenticals, or bug eyed humanoids with no nose, that travel across the universe in a saucer-shaped space ship. If a physicist can conceptualize of a ship bending space in front of it (wow, a physicist could describe warp drive) that does not mean there is evidence that this can or does happen, or that technology to do such a thing exists. If it did, that wouldn't mean that spiritual entities that interact with people in non-physical ways are actually fleshly beings on a distant planet that travel here in rocketships or in flying saucers.
As I mentioned before, researchers who have researched UFO phenomenon find it to be an occulting phenomenon. Two agnostic scientists decades ago, one of whom did a report for Congress, basically determined that the accounts of interactions with UFOs were similar to if not identical to accounts of encounters with demons. Dr. Hugh Ross, an astrophysicist who has interviewed those who experienced UFO type phenomenon found that how intense their encounters were corresponded with their involvement in the occult. The vast majority are explained by simple phenomenon like viewing the planet Venus at certain times, weather balloons and such. Of those that cannot be explained that way, dabblers in the occult see lights in the sky. Those more intensely involved in the occult might see the ship, or see aliens, or talk to aliens get abducted and such. The more intense experiences happen to those more intensely involved in the occult.
If you acknowledge there is spiritual, occult, etc. phenomenon, why bring space ships into the explanation in the first place?
Ross also found that technological displays kept pace with the current understanding/mythology, etc. In the early part of the 20th century, their ships could go slightly faster than our blimp-type craft and they claimed to be on the back side of the moon. Scientists now consider aliens on the back side of the moon not to be feasible, so now they are from far away, and their craft are faster than our jets. Explanations fit our current technological theories. It makes sense that they may be spiritual beings pretending to be physical alien type beings.