Evidence for the Sexual Superiority of Monogamy and Marriage.

[Kalinago]

Keep in mind outcast cannot even have sex out of desire for his wife in fundementalist Christ insanity.its supposed to be unitive and for making babies only.both good concepts but not the only good concept.

So he is forever going to sin snd be a degenerate from his anuian worldview because it's impossible to not ever abstain from sex with sexual desire and passion for your spouse .

What a truly anti human system ?

He still won't answer how polygamy is wrong,for what reasons or why his egregore gave David Saul's wives and then them as wives to his close friend to have sex in public by his reptilian gods' own doing?

And your stupid bible is not objective morality .

Slavery and owning humans as property is not moral...eating your parents is not moral...this is also moral in your book.

As is human sacrifice.

[Kalinago]

He still won't answer how polygamy is wrong

From what I understand, @Outcast9428 perceives it as a societal issue rather than a religious one. He's a practical man. So if polygamy was widely accepted and seen as okay, wealthy men with good taste would "buy up" a multitude of beautiful wives to fill up their harems. An average Joe would, in the long run, be shit out of luck. Because over time the practice of polygamy becomes the norm, and normal men suffer.

He has always been opposed to Islam for this reason; men who would not be able to afford a wife, would become bitter and overly horny. And join various wars of religious conquests. Rage and a desire to find women would drive these young men to go out and fight, as they feel no chance at marriage to a desirable woman on a low wage in their nations of origin. It's a fine system because it drives men to war. But it would not work in the long run. It would only work if only a few men would have the ability to maintain multiple wives. Once it becomes a reasonably common occurance, many men will be unable to find a wife. The way many Chinese men are aggressive and overly nationalistic... its out of sexual frustration because the gender imbalance in their country (too many available men, not enough available women) make them that way.

If we put religion aside and strictly look at it from a societal lense, the reasons for Outcast's distaste for polygamy are sensible. If polygamy would remain the exception rather than the rule, things should be fine. But if it would become legally allowed in the West for example, things would probably go to shit because a large portion of men would be forced out of the dating market practically over night and the most desirable women taken out of the equation. It could be a recipe for disaster.

That does not mean I do not see the appeal, personally. Because I absolutely see the appeal of polygamy. I just think that its good if it remains a bit of a niche lifestyle and does not become too commonplace. If it's universally regarded as acceptable, it could be a bloodbath. You cannot advocate for a lifestyle of Kings and allow all men to potentially live it... because sadly, not all men are created equally. Some of us are not meant to be Kings.

I don't offer it as something for everybody just myself and other agro pastoralists.the notion that you must be rich to do so is false from a agro pastoral or hunter gatherer pov.

Modernity creates problems against our nature.

[Kalinago]

@MarcosZeitola also there should be a limit to how many.I find two,three or four enough me.

Even one woman is enough for me.

But not the bliss sexually that I deserve .

[Kalinago]

I don't offer it as something for everybody just myself and other agro pastoralists.the notion that you must be rich to do so is false from a agro pastoral or hunter gatherer pov.

Modernity creates problems against our nature.

Agreed. A problem for me would be to combine that sort of lifestyle with certain earthly pleasures I like. For instance I still enjoy to travel every once in a while. I also love fine dining. Or throwing parties. Airplane tickets are expensive, haha. Life in general is expensive. And since I have a lot of relatives in Europe and Asia and even America who I want to visit, I would not stay in one place for many years at a time. That's why, for me, I could defnitely never afford polygamy as a lifestyle unless I was a multimillionaire.

I'm not opposed to it as a lifestyle at all. For many men it would be a dream come true, and if you are able to prevent jealous from occurring between different wives, it would truly be like Heaven. But if it goes wrong, perhaps it could be a man's personal hell.

If I make a passive income I can travel every year with one of my wives and her kids and another set next year .

Beside the fact I only need healthy natural filling organic food to be happy ,plenty of sex and a nice living space by nature growing my own food and living off grid while still making money passively and warm weather

And of course the odd entheogen.

[MrMan]

One of the worst and most damaging lies the liberal establishment has convinced the majority of Americans of, is that monogamy somehow will kill your sex life. That once guys' get married, their sexual life goes to pot. That religious, social conservatives are basically just prudes who dislike sex because Christianity taught them that sex was evil. The truth is, nobody thinks sex is evil except for a tiny minority of people, they think certain ways of treating sex is evil. @NGH607's idea that "sexual repression" is what's ruining people is quite frankly ridiculous. Attempts to truly repress sexuality altogether and people who attempt to repress sexuality altogether have been very rare throughout history. Overwhelmingly, the idea has simply been to control what circumstances people are allowed to have it in.

I'm gonna cite @Winston on this one too because he still seems to naively support hookup culture.

Overwhelmingly, as @MrMan has been trying to tell us... Religious, monogamous people by far have the best sex lives. And this is the data supporting that fact...



This study finds that sex within marriage is more fulfilling, that 88% of married people are satisfied with their marital sex lives (contrary to Hollywood's portrayal that most married people are sexless).

https://www.imom.com/poll-shows-sex-wit ... 9BtfvkrKYk

The religiously unaffiliated women were also the least likely to orgasm during sex with only 22% orgasming every time compared to 32% of Evangelical women.

This article shows that 25% of married couples, compared to only 5% of singles, have sex twice a week or more. 61% of singles had no sex at all within the last year, compared to 18% of married people.

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/want-mor ... bb9372aff2

In the 1950s, we had significantly more sex then we do today. The average person had sex twice a week or more, in 2004, it seems 1/3 couples had sex twice a week or more, now its only 25%. The article specifically mentions the fact that women work now as the root cause of this...

https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2004/aug ... r.research

Women are significantly more likely to orgasm the longer they are in a relationship with a guy. 67% of women orgasmed last time they had sex when they had been in a relationship for 6 months or more compared to only 11% of women who orgasmed during a one night stand.



Women who support traditional gender roles are generally happier then liberal women are...

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10 ... 9010003005

Overall, the evidence overwhelmingly points to the conclusion that, far from "repressing everybody's sexuality," traditional, monogamous lifestyles have served to enrich people's sex lives. It is promiscuity, women in the workforce, and hookup culture which is threatening the quality of people's sex lives.

I find it absolutly hilarious that a incel little omega faggit thinks he knows what sexual superiority is
Being sexually superior means you know how to satisfy a woman in the bedroom!!!
Ive f***ed loads of women and had them screaming my name
DANIEL OH YEAH DANIEL!!!
Ive had their wet pussys squirting all over my face like a supersoaker everytime my tongue is using their clit as a punching bag

I didn't know the doctor's made them where they'd be able to excrete that type of fluid.

We know your name is 'Daniel' now, so you'd better treat us nicely.

Some of us monogamous types have dealt out thousands of orgasms to our lady also. Why is having sex with more women (and ladyboys in your case) supposed to be a sign of sexual superiority? If you have to go out and have a one night stand, are you able to get sex night after night? Wouldn't you have to settle for a woman (or biological male) who is sub-optimal looking as far as your tastes went? As a young man, I was able to get sexual release night after night from a stunner? (It's not every night at my age.)

I also don't have to exert myself with one liners, buying girls drinks, getting blocked by her friends, getting close to taking a girl home only to go home sexless, etc. I can be dressed in a white T-shirt and a pair of shorts, without leaving the house, and tell my wife, "Let's have sex tonight"-- no lines, no real effort, and that can end up in having sex at 12 AM or something like that.

And it's not empty meaningless sex with a stranger. It's with someone I really care about who knows what I like. Then she cooks for me, too, and mops the kitchen.

If I ever got so old, fat, or decrepit that there is no chance I would ever to be able to pick up some strange girl at a bar, if I were into that, if I'm able to perform at that age, I've got a wife to have sex with. If she gets like that, we can just turn off the lights. Your looks don't last forever. Your sex drive doesn't stay at the same level as when you are young, either. What will you have from all the youthful fornicating when you are old? I've got a wife. I've got kids. They know who I am.

There is also the idea of having kids out there you didn't raise. I mean, assuming you aren't and haven't always been sterile, there could be some poor kid out there whose dad isn't raising him. Doesn't that bother you? I've raised or am raising all of my biological children. I don't have a kid out there that is mine that I don't know about. If someone knocks on my door and says he thinks I'm his dad, I know he's wrong.

Kids raised without their fathers are at a higher risk for all kinds of issues, trouble with the law, teen pregnancy, issue with their education, etc.

Marital patriarchal polygamy is the best of both worlds but you want to push your Christian nonsense worldview on all men.

I can have both the good of variety and committed relationships in polygamy.

With none of the bad like getting bored with one wife or chasing women with uncertainty and no real connection or intimacy.

The polygamist would have the wife situation many times over, especially if he doesn't have eunuch servants to keep the harem in a separate palace so he can drop in and hang out or have sex with a woman or women. Polygamy was probably more common in the past in societies that had a lot of war where men were killed off and there were excess women. It wouldn't work for Pax Americana. A few men would have a lot of wives and other men would have no wife. It's kind of like the 'chad' one-night-stand dating world the black pillers on the forum complain about, where the chads and tyrones get the one-night-stands and the men on the other end of the bell curve get nothing.

Imagine what a Muslim polygamist with two to four wives who doesn't have separate mansions for each of them. They live together, probably get jealous of each other, and he's got to deal with two to four women's PMS, emotional issues, exacerbated by jealousy and whatever demands for his attention they might have. He might have dreamed they'd have competed with him for sexual attention as he added wives, but then they compete for emotional attention. At 50, he adds a 18-year-old with a tight body who turns out to be sexually demanding and puts a big smile on his face for a while, but he is in his 60's when he has a sexually-demanding 35-year-old and three other wives, putting a strain on his heart while he's popping Viagra left and right. That sounds fun, but he has to tell four women about his day and deal with their menopause and other issues.

Yahweh also gave multiple wives to David and them punished him by giving those women to his close friend to sleep with in public?

Absalom was his son. He had sex with David's concubines, his own step-mothers, which was pretty nasty and against the law of God. God did not give these women to Absalom as wives, but told David it would happen because of David's adultery.

Christ's teaching turned our attention to the original design of marriage, that two shall be one flesh.

[Kalinago]

@MrMan I hate when Christian apologists misrepresents verses.

Yahweh gave Saul's wives to David in the text and also made Absalom sleep with his wives as punishment,I suggest you read the Hebrew where it is both Yahweh's own doing.

You should read the relevant verses on mechon mamre or with a concordance like I do(I speak a bit of Hebrew and can read Hebrew ).

I don't mind being corrected but this is a Christian cognitive dissonance and misrepresented what the god of the bible did and does.

Don't rely on interpreting the bible thru your own pressupositions and always check the original language rather than translations that seek to harmonize or purify certain passages.

[shogunpanda007]

@MarcosZeitola also there should be a limit to how many.I find two,three or four enough me.

Even one woman is enough for me.

But not the bliss sexually that I deserve .

In Islam the maximum is four as well. I think that is a sensible maximum number of wives. I reckon most men could not afford the dowry for that many wives, but I have no concept of how high a dowry would be in different parts of the world. I am also not sure how much of a barrier language or being from a different culture would be in this process. I wonder in which places of the world a European man such as myself could acquire such beauties. Especially beautiful northern Indian girls who many told me are "off-limits" to non-Indians. I know one European man who married an Indian woman, but she was very dark and her not that beautiful. I also know one European man who married a Somali girl but she grew up in the West; he converted to Islam to be with her. They seem happy.

The rise of Hindu nationalism in Modi's India has lead to tension between Hindus and Muslims which could lead to a greater regional ethnic war that could explode anytime on territorial border disputes between Pakistan and India.

Hindu Nationalists discourage Hindu-Muslim relationships by using violence and intimidation to scare off people. It is culturally taboo to marry outside your religious-ethnic tribe with the "enemy" for marriage and even forbidden to pro-create with them. It's a very tribal society.

[HouseMD]

He still won't answer how polygamy is wrong

From what I understand, @Outcast9428 perceives it as a societal issue rather than a religious one. He's a practical man. So if polygamy was widely accepted and seen as okay, wealthy men with good taste would "buy up" a multitude of beautiful wives to fill up their harems. An average Joe would, in the long run, be shit out of luck. Because over time the practice of polygamy becomes the norm, and normal men suffer.

He has always been opposed to Islam for this reason; men who would not be able to afford a wife, would become bitter and overly horny. And join various wars of religious conquests. Rage and a desire to find women would drive these young men to go out and fight, as they feel no chance at marriage to a desirable woman on a low wage in their nations of origin. It's a fine system because it drives men to war. But it would not work in the long run. It would only work if only a few men would have the ability to maintain multiple wives. Once it becomes a reasonably common occurance, many men will be unable to find a wife. The way many Chinese men are aggressive and overly nationalistic... its out of sexual frustration because the gender imbalance in their country (too many available men, not enough available women) make them that way.

If we put religion aside and strictly look at it from a societal lense, the reasons for Outcast's distaste for polygamy are sensible. If polygamy would remain the exception rather than the rule, things should be fine. But if it would become legally allowed in the West for example, things would probably go to shit because a large portion of men would be forced out of the dating market practically over night and the most desirable women taken out of the equation. It could be a recipe for disaster.

That does not mean I do not see the appeal, personally. Because I absolutely see the appeal of polygamy. I just think that its good if it remains a bit of a niche lifestyle and does not become too commonplace. If it's universally regarded as acceptable, it could be a bloodbath. You cannot advocate for a lifestyle of Kings and allow all men to potentially live it... because sadly, not all men are created equally. Some of us are not meant to be Kings.

It sounds like it's all fun and games until you're living it. If you actually love the women you're involved with it becomes very complicated to keep the peace. That's a big part of the reason I made the shift back to monogamy- it is the way of peace for any man that views a woman as a partner and not an object. If you're a narcissist or a psychopath that is just using women for sex, polygamy could very well be the way to go. But honestly, sex is far better when there is real connection there, so I still think loving, committed relationships are the best way to go, even if sex is what you value

[CaptainSkelebob]

@CaptainSkelebob Lmao that’s rich. If you were so great at sex then you wouldn’t have to blackmail that fat bitch Denise for sex every week. I won’t go into detail because that’s quite impolite to do so but all I will say is that I’m doing perfectly fine in the bedroom.

To continue my response to @WilliamSmith even though 40% of first marriages fail, I’d argue a little bit of common sense will still take you a long ways towards reducing that risk. 60% of divorces involve adultery. Stats show that men and women commit adultery in equal numbers so simply not committing adultery should reduce your risk of divorce by 30%. In addition, 25% of divorce cases involve domestic abuse, so not abusing your wife helps too lol. Having a close relationship with your wife’s family also reduces the risk of divorce by 20%.

These are all some really easy fixes that statistically can cut a man’s chances of divorce in half. Of course there are plenty of men who do everything right and still get f***ed over. The only way to stop that from happening is fix the divorce laws. But if the risk of that is 20% then I suspect a big part of it is simply choosing bad women to get married to. If a man chooses a good woman and doesn’t abuse her, commit adultery, sexually deprive her, and maintains a good relationship with her family… The chances of divorce are actually pretty low.

And I can confirm that all the men in my family have acted in precisely that manner, and none of them are divorced.

Go f**k urself you little rat

[CaptainSkelebob]

One of the worst and most damaging lies the liberal establishment has convinced the majority of Americans of, is that monogamy somehow will kill your sex life. That once guys' get married, their sexual life goes to pot. That religious, social conservatives are basically just prudes who dislike sex because Christianity taught them that sex was evil. The truth is, nobody thinks sex is evil except for a tiny minority of people, they think certain ways of treating sex is evil. @NGH607's idea that "sexual repression" is what's ruining people is quite frankly ridiculous. Attempts to truly repress sexuality altogether and people who attempt to repress sexuality altogether have been very rare throughout history. Overwhelmingly, the idea has simply been to control what circumstances people are allowed to have it in.

I'm gonna cite @Winston on this one too because he still seems to naively support hookup culture.

Overwhelmingly, as @MrMan has been trying to tell us... Religious, monogamous people by far have the best sex lives. And this is the data supporting that fact...



This study finds that sex within marriage is more fulfilling, that 88% of married people are satisfied with their marital sex lives (contrary to Hollywood's portrayal that most married people are sexless).

https://www.imom.com/poll-shows-sex-wit ... 9BtfvkrKYk

The religiously unaffiliated women were also the least likely to orgasm during sex with only 22% orgasming every time compared to 32% of Evangelical women.

This article shows that 25% of married couples, compared to only 5% of singles, have sex twice a week or more. 61% of singles had no sex at all within the last year, compared to 18% of married people.

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/want-mor ... bb9372aff2

In the 1950s, we had significantly more sex then we do today. The average person had sex twice a week or more, in 2004, it seems 1/3 couples had sex twice a week or more, now its only 25%. The article specifically mentions the fact that women work now as the root cause of this...

https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2004/aug ... r.research

Women are significantly more likely to orgasm the longer they are in a relationship with a guy. 67% of women orgasmed last time they had sex when they had been in a relationship for 6 months or more compared to only 11% of women who orgasmed during a one night stand.



Women who support traditional gender roles are generally happier then liberal women are...

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10 ... 9010003005

Overall, the evidence overwhelmingly points to the conclusion that, far from "repressing everybody's sexuality," traditional, monogamous lifestyles have served to enrich people's sex lives. It is promiscuity, women in the workforce, and hookup culture which is threatening the quality of people's sex lives.

I find it absolutly hilarious that a incel little omega faggit thinks he knows what sexual superiority is
Being sexually superior means you know how to satisfy a woman in the bedroom!!!
Ive f***ed loads of women and had them screaming my name
DANIEL OH YEAH DANIEL!!!
Ive had their wet pussys squirting all over my face like a supersoaker everytime my tongue is using their clit as a punching bag

I didn't know the doctor's made them where they'd be able to excrete that type of fluid.

We know your name is 'Daniel' now, so you'd better treat us nicely.

Some of us monogamous types have dealt out thousands of orgasms to our lady also. Why is having sex with more women (and ladyboys in your case) supposed to be a sign of sexual superiority? If you have to go out and have a one night stand, are you able to get sex night after night? Wouldn't you have to settle for a woman (or biological male) who is sub-optimal looking as far as your tastes went? As a young man, I was able to get sexual release night after night from a stunner? (It's not every night at my age.)

I also don't have to exert myself with one liners, buying girls drinks, getting blocked by her friends, getting close to taking a girl home only to go home sexless, etc. I can be dressed in a white T-shirt and a pair of shorts, without leaving the house, and tell my wife, "Let's have sex tonight"-- no lines, no real effort, and that can end up in having sex at 12 AM or something like that.

And it's not empty meaningless sex with a stranger. It's with someone I really care about who knows what I like. Then she cooks for me, too, and mops the kitchen.

If I ever got so old, fat, or decrepit that there is no chance I would ever to be able to pick up some strange girl at a bar, if I were into that, if I'm able to perform at that age, I've got a wife to have sex with. If she gets like that, we can just turn off the lights. Your looks don't last forever. Your sex drive doesn't stay at the same level as when you are young, either. What will you have from all the youthful fornicating when you are old? I've got a wife. I've got kids. They know who I am.

There is also the idea of having kids out there you didn't raise. I mean, assuming you aren't and haven't always been sterile, there could be some poor kid out there whose dad isn't raising him. Doesn't that bother you? I've raised or am raising all of my biological children. I don't have a kid out there that is mine that I don't know about. If someone knocks on my door and says he thinks I'm his dad, I know he's wrong.

Kids raised without their fathers are at a higher risk for all kinds of issues, trouble with the law, teen pregnancy, issue with their education, etc.

First of all I dont give a flying monkeys if you 2 fags know my name @MrMan and @Outcast9428 for the simple reason that I know I could knock you both out if I had to
Booshka fellas!! Lights out fellas!!!
1 2 1 2
Booshka booshka BOOOOOOOOOOOOOSHKA!!!
Thats right you f***ing queers
Im the badass alpha king and you 2 are like the slime that crawled out the ocean
"Oh dont worry I wont dox you"
f**k off
As if you have the balls
Im the f***ing man
The f***ing don
The badass
I f***ed over 100 women
Ive f***ed hot ladyboys that are so fenineie they make ur f***ing girlfriends look like damaged crash test dummys....
So suck my dick you pair of f***ing tits

[MrMan]

Ive f***ed hot ladyboys that are so fenineie they make ur f***ing girlfriends look like damaged crash test dummys....
So suck my dick you pair of f***ing tits

Your insults even turned gay.

[Outcast9428]

Whatever helps you sleep at night @CaptainSkelebob

[WilliamSmith]

@WilliamSmith

The statistics you posted are not true, the success rate of marriages is much much higher then you claim it is. The divorce rate in terms of how many first marriages will end in divorce is actually 40%, not 80%.

https://www.wf-lawyers.com/divorce-stat ... and-facts/

Not even the most pessimistic statistics claim that 80% of marriages fail which leads me to the conclusion that you simply made that figure up.

@Outcast9428
OH, COME ON!!! LOL, HAVE A LITTLE MORE FAITH IN ME THAN THAT!
I didn't actually mean to type all that in all caps past the first 3 words, but my point is: I'm not making any stats up, even if I was mistaken (in which case let's get into the data and try to figure it out, and I'll cite where I got that from next time I'm back to HA).
I find this an interesting topic).
But trust me, I am NOT the enemy of TMM:
Didn't I even say something about how I wanted TMM to succeed, but am just convinced it's almost always a flop?
Like I've said before, I never bang any married women or even women in LTR relationships who are cheating (who frankly I've heard are even easier than single women a lot of times, per the timeless wisdom penned by"Dirk Manley" (aka Major Mark Cunningham and Ross Jeffries) in "Scoring with Married Women,"

The actual enemies of TMM are 1) the subverters of "traditional societies" that try to uphold TMM as an ideal, and 2) all the chumps (male and female) who sign up for it while preaching about its superiority, and then do pretty much nothing but bollocks it up and fail disastrously, while cheating and busting up in divorces, (unlike me, who has done nothing but watch other peoples' monogamous marriages fail miserably since I was a little boy, so naturally haven't been too keen to try it myself).

But I've saved the 3 pages thus far of this thread to disk and I'll cite specifically where I got my stats (and btw the 75-80% was actually studying monogamous LTR relationships, not just marriages, but from what I've read, they're in an even worse state of decline).

[Outcast9428]

@WilliamSmith

The statistics you posted are not true, the success rate of marriages is much much higher then you claim it is. The divorce rate in terms of how many first marriages will end in divorce is actually 40%, not 80%.

https://www.wf-lawyers.com/divorce-stat ... and-facts/

Not even the most pessimistic statistics claim that 80% of marriages fail which leads me to the conclusion that you simply made that figure up.

@Outcast9428
OH, COME ON!!! LOL, HAVE A LITTLE MORE FAITH IN ME THAN THAT!
I didn't actually mean to type all that in all caps past the first 3 words, but my point is: I'm not making any stats up, even if I was mistaken (in which case let's get into the data and try to figure it out, and I'll cite where I got that from next time I'm back to HA).
I find this an interesting topic).
But trust me, I am NOT the enemy of TMM:
Didn't I even say something about how I wanted TMM to succeed, but am just convinced it's almost always a flop?
Like I've said before, I never bang any married women or even women in LTR relationships who are cheating (who frankly I've heard are even easier than single women a lot of times, per the timeless wisdom penned by"Dirk Manley" (aka Major Mark Cunningham and Ross Jeffries) in "Scoring with Married Women,"

The actual enemies of TMM are 1) the subverters of "traditional societies" that try to uphold TMM as an ideal, and 2) all the chumps (male and female) who sign up for it while preaching about its superiority, and then do pretty much nothing but bollocks it up and fail disastrously, while cheating and busting up in divorces, (unlike me, who has done nothing but watch other peoples' monogamous marriages fail miserably since I was a little boy, so naturally haven't been too keen to try it myself).

But I've saved the 3 pages thus far of this thread to disk and I'll cite specifically where I got my stats (and btw the 75-80% was actually studying monogamous LTR relationships, not just marriages, but from what I've read, they're in an even worse state of decline).

The failure rate of monogamous LTR is very different from the failure rate of marriages. Every monogamous LTR that doesn’t end in marriage basically fails so if a person has 4 long term relationships before getting married and then that one succeeds, you have an 80% failure rate, technically.

The actual divorce rate for first marriages is about 36%-38%. So marriage is more likely to succeed then not. Even with that statistic, however, looks kind of scary. The good thing is that if you are really determined to make it work, you can lower the odds of your marriage failing by a significant margin. A lot of those marriages fail because of abuse, adultery, neglect, and more.

One thing I’ve discovered about life is that, most people are so bad at it, that simply not doing the wrong thing takes you like 75% of the way over the finish line.

[CaptainSkelebob]

Ive f***ed hot ladyboys that are so fenineie they make ur f***ing girlfriends look like damaged crash test dummys....
So suck my dick you pair of f***ing tits

Your insults even turned gay.

This is ur wishful thinking you closet faghot
Ur probly @Outcast9428 new boyfriend since you both like sucking each others cocks so hard