We need to be social media stars

[WilliamSmith]

I've always had a lot of ideas, but get stymied by the tech stuff. If there are any techies out there who can create websites, edit and add production value to videos, and would like to wed this capability to lots of content, hit me up.

What content would you do? Maybe a bunch of us could get together and do something, like those cuckservative lotus eater people have done.

You can all count on me to rip cuckservatives a new one (I already got suspended from Twitter for "abuse and harrassment" of Jordan B. Peterson, for example), but who do you mean by "those cuckservative lotus eater people"?

[Mr. Mistoffelees]

I like anything to do with cats or funny compilation videos. lol maybe you guys could do something like that?

[Cornfed]

I've always had a lot of ideas, but get stymied by the tech stuff. If there are any techies out there who can create websites, edit and add production value to videos, and would like to wed this capability to lots of content, hit me up.

What content would you do? Maybe a bunch of us could get together and do something, like those cuckservative lotus eater people have done.

You can all count on me to rip cuckservatives a new one (I already got suspended from Twitter for "abuse and harrassment" of Jordan B. Peterson, for example), but who do you mean by "those cuckservative lotus eater people"?

These people:
https://www.youtube.com/@ThePodcastoftheLotusEaters

[Cornfed]

@Cornfed

I've actually been considering doing something like this. I thought about making a YouTube channel where I could talk about different philosophical concepts, paranormal and spiritual things. I would definitely be open to a collaborative effort. Perhaps a channel where we can all talk about different things, have large live debates and all the rest of it. It would contain a little bit of all the different flavours HA has to offer. I really like the idea.

We would have to agree on a theme and a monetisation strategy from the beginning. In particular, we need to settle the issue on whether we want to be JewTube friendly. If we do, videos posted on the channel would need to be submitted for approval and editing by trusted people.

[Cornfed]

The theme can be diverse. We could talk about many different things from philosophy, religion and spirituality, paranormal and other things that won't get us banned. We could post links to off YouTube platforms where we can talk about political and cultural issues elsewhere that would get us demonetised from the YouTube platform.

The question is whether a diverse theme is marketable. I'd want to make money. The idea would probably be to work out what people who wanted in could speak about and then agree on a cohesive theme. This and the censorship and advertiser preferences would necessitate excluding certain stuff.

[kangarunner]

@Cornfed Look mate...I'll kick yer f***ing ass all the way back to NZ you rude cunt.

[Cornfed]

A myriad of different topics will attract a larger audience, will it not?

Not necessarily. A lack of a theme would mean people would have less incentive to subscribe to the channel rather than just searching the platform generally. There would be less incentive for advertisers to sponsor the channel. Topics that would attract some people would repel others. The channel could be banned from JewTube for some tiny, inconsequential topic when the rest might pass.

[Lucas88]

A myriad of different topics will attract a larger audience, will it not?

Not necessarily. A lack of a theme would mean people would have less incentive to subscribe to the channel rather than just searching the platform generally. There would be less incentive for advertisers to sponsor the channel. Topics that would attract some people would repel others.

This is 100% correct. I follow a gaming channel - The Professional - which started off as a GTA Online channel and achieved a large following as such, but as soon as the content creator became burned out with GTA Online and began to upload playthroughs of other games, a subset of his audience complained and many unsubscribed. Even a slight change in your content can cause people to lose interest in your channel.



With regard to YouTube content creation, pretty much every source that I've read recommends a narrow focus and to offer a niche product.

@Pixel--Dude

[Cornfed]

With regard to YouTube content creation, pretty much every source that I've read recommends a narrow focus and to offer a niche product.

That being the case, shall we settle on a theme. It seems that most of us are into men becoming better men - stronger, healthier, able to kick ass, better living situation, more cultured etc. We should make a sexy name and such around something like that. This is not to say that members couldn't use the channel as a vehicle to link to other themes on some platform other than YouTube.

[WilliamSmith]

I've always had a lot of ideas, but get stymied by the tech stuff. If there are any techies out there who can create websites, edit and add production value to videos, and would like to wed this capability to lots of content, hit me up.

What content would you do? Maybe a bunch of us could get together and do something, like those cuckservative lotus eater people have done.

You can all count on me to rip cuckservatives a new one (I already got suspended from Twitter for "abuse and harrassment" of Jordan B. Peterson, for example), but who do you mean by "those cuckservative lotus eater people"?

These people:
https://www.youtube.com/@ThePodcastoftheLotusEaters

Ah, thank you.

To the overall topic: I certainly don't have anything against you being a "social media star," but why is social media supposedly your central focus? (An honest question. Just curious why you think that's the best route, as opposed to any # of theoretic ventures you could do anonymously, pseudonomously, etc?)

[Cornfed]

To the overall topic: I certainly don't have anything against you being a "social media star," but why is social media supposedly your central focus? (An honest question. Just curious why you think that's the best route, as opposed to any # of theoretic ventures you could do anonymously, pseudonomously, etc?)

What would be the alternative when it comes to getting money and social status and making a contribution? I'm interested in any alternatives, but there don't seem to be any.

[WilliamSmith]

Firstly, let's see who is interested in the general idea and then once we have an idea of who is interested we can then see what people think the theme should be.

@Pixel--Dude
@Cornfed
@gsjackson

I'm not trying to say anything discouraging, but I think you guys should be careful of 2 things:

#1 Legal risk in any group venture:
As soon as any collaborative effort that involves even a small sum of money (or even theoretic "pro forma" earnings, who has which rights to which content, etc), it immediately opens the door to potential legal difficulties and lawsuits. And of course, even though I have my doubts about whether nearly every member of the forum since the 2020s is actually government agents like HappyGuy was so convinced of, you never really want to trust anyone too much, even if you like each other...
Of course, kangarunner and I openly admitted to being espionage agents campaigning to "subvert the right" by coming to this forum a lot, so you know the two of us cannot be trusted, even though he actually has a promising youtube channel going....

#2 High vulnerability to cancellation of accounts based on ANYTHING any one member said anywhere (not just in whatever content you'd collaborate to create!).
It isn't a question of whether there's even anything questionable in your content: It's a question of whether YOU personally (any of you) ever said or did anything anywhere that the ZOG and their sjw "useful idiots" want to have your whole operation shut down for.

I know a lot of musicians and some other content creators, and some of them who never even had anything controversial in their music have been cancelled for something they once said or wrote elsewhere even when their projects had nothing to do with it.
And not just the obvious jew sites like jewtube or faceberg, but even other sites like Bandcamp or that "Gumroad" thing.

Varg Vikernes was one notable example. Last time I checked all his music had been eliminated from Bandcamp despite it being a bunch of ambient stuff with no lyrics and had never even been about his "European" pagan pride stuff or his long history of bodly naming the jew.
I only spotted this guy on Twitter and didn't listen to any of his songs, but here's another random example of a guy being banned by jewtube and cancelled off lots of other platforms, and apparently shadowbanned even on the comparatively improved Twitter, for example.

[gsjackson]

On the subject of alternative projects, WS, have you heard of Troy Noonan in your day-trading ventures? If so, do you think his book is worth getting? What led you into it? I like the idea that you're not investing in any American companies, which would be a bit hard to swallow, but just playing the percentages each day to try to make incremental gains.

[Cornfed]

I'm not trying to say anything discouraging, but I think you guys should be careful of 2 things:

#1 Legal risk in any group venture:
As soon as any collaborative effort that involves even a small sum of money (or even theoretic "pro forma" earnings, who has which rights to which content, etc), it immediately opens the door to potential legal difficulties and lawsuits. And of course, even though I have my doubts about whether nearly every member of the forum since the 2020s is actually government agents like HappyGuy was so convinced of, you never really want to trust anyone too much, even if you like each other...
Of course, kangarunner and I openly admitted to being espionage agents campaigning to "subvert the right" by coming to this forum a lot, so you know the two of us cannot be trusted, even though he actually has a promising youtube channel going....

#2 High vulnerability to cancellation of accounts based on ANYTHING any one member said anywhere (not just in whatever content you'd collaborate to create!).

A way to do it would be to agree upfront on who would provide the infrastructure and the cut of revenue they would take. If content creators at any time thought the arrangement was unfair there would be nothing to stop them from taking their content and going elsewhere without having paid out any money. As for the guilt by association thing, that is just a risk you take with any public venture. Presumably people interested in this would not have any huge amount of celebrity status to currently lose.

[WilliamSmith]

A myriad of different topics will attract a larger audience, will it not?

Not necessarily. A lack of a theme would mean people would have less incentive to subscribe to the channel rather than just searching the platform generally. There would be less incentive for advertisers to sponsor the channel. Topics that would attract some people would repel others.

This is 100% correct. I follow a gaming channel - The Professional - which started off as a GTA Online channel and achieved a large following as such, but as soon as the content creator became burned out with GTA Online and began to upload playthroughs of other games, a subset of his audience complained and many unsubscribed. Even a slight change in your content can cause people to lose interest in your channel.

With regard to YouTube content creation, pretty much every source that I've read recommends a narrow focus and to offer a niche product.

@Pixel--Dude

@Pixel--Dude
@Lucas88

That occurred to me as well, and I have also read that about how niche focus tends to be best for internet-based content creation overall (not just jewtube, which I never personally looked into trying to do):

I'm rather "prolific" in my interests and am considering blogging all my thoughts in one big conglomerated spot (with sub-topics to index it all, partly to help me keep track of it for myself, LOL), yet I'm not actually sure that's the best way to go when it comes to earning $$$.

I'm not trying to sound overly conclusive because I haven't researched it deeply enough yet, but I've read that "niche" sites built entirely with commercial motives tend to perform best when it comes to things like advertising revenue and SEO to facilitate discovery. (That might not matter for me because I make $$$ in other ways, but it's something to have in mind or research more if your guys' goal is to make $$$.)