Is Our Earth FLAT and Motionless, Not a Spinning Globe?

[Voyager1]

Nice. You managed to sound condescending and unimaginative in less than six words. Efficient.

It only takes six words to take you down creep

[Prince of Cups]

Nice. You managed to sound condescending and unimaginative in less than six words. Efficient.

It only takes six words to take you down creep

You're an idiot. If a neurologist could see your brain they would whistle like a mechanic

[Voyager1]

You're an idiot. If a neurologist could see your brain they would whistle like a mechanic

Isn't it about time you hit the gay bars in T.O.? I'm sure you'll give someone a fun time tonight

[Winston]

Nice. You managed to sound condescending and unimaginative in less than six words. Efficient.

It only takes six words to take you down creep

@Voyager1 I told you before to stop insulting and trashing people. This is a warning. Next time you will be banned. Thanks.

[Winston]

@Winston, I think the Earth is neither flat nor a spinning globe. I think the true nature of the Earth is that it is a wave. If the double slit experiment shows us anything, it shows us that reality is probability manifested by conscious perception. Kind of like a simulation with procedural generation by conscious minds. Therefore, Earth is neither a globe, nor a flat plane, but instead, a wave.

That could be. If we are in a simulation or dream or illusion, then reality is not solid or objective, so Earth could have no shape and just be a wave at one level. But even if that's true, that still begs the question: What would happen if you took a ship or plane 100,000 ft in the sky or higher? What would Earth look like through windows that are NOT curved or altered? From what I've seen, the Earth still looks flat from 100,000 ft from amateur balloon cameras.

Like I said before, you can't see the Earth's curvature from any altitude, probably because it doesn't have curvature. It is SPACE-TIME that is curving. Higher mathematics says that there is no such thing as a straight line. Everything in the universe CURVES. This means that time and space are curving around itself, inside of the enclosed bubble we live inside with a dome around us. So when you walk in a straight line, you are walking in a curve of space-time and eventually a curve comes back to square one. And that's the reason the Earth can be round but flat at the same time, because the fabric of space-time is what is warping around itself. This is the solution that explains proofs for both globe and flat Earth.

[Winston]

Here's a few big questions that will make you all scratch your head:

1) If earth is moving in space at 67,000 mph and the solar system is moving around the galaxy at 500,000 mph, then why are the stars the same every night and the north star Polaris is fixed and stationary?

These are easy questions.

1) Polaris is not fixed, not stationary. It is also moving, but as it is in the center and far away, its movement is small, very difficult to measure, only some observatories are able to to it.
You might compare this with a large rotating wheel, the center of the wheel appears to be not moving.

2) The moon is too far away you cannot see a rocket or debris hitting the moon's surface with your eyes and even not with a very large telescope.
You also can see only one side of the moon. You might also say, earth did not change during the few years you are alive.

3) There are very serious issues about producing electricity and about low temperature, solar power is not even available all the time.
Receiving data and broadcasting data are not the same. To broadcast you need a lot of power.

If you have a good radio amateur equipment/and the required permits and place for antennas and a good location, you can send with high power signals straight to the moon if it is near/over your location and listen to the echo coming back, called EME (earth-moon-earth). Depends on the position you can also talk to other people living on other places in the world.

4) Of course rockets will never go straight up into space, they first circle the earth a few times, getting higher and higher and faster and after reaching a certain position they will leave the earth and move on into outer space.

Well those are ad hoc explanations. Anyone can make them up. What do you expect the establishment to do? Admit that space is a hoax and that they are lying to you? They can make up anything. You can't verify anything. You take it all on faith. Anyone can lie to you. Why do you assume the government and establishment tells the truth all the time? Any smart person knows they don't.

The fact is Polaris is stationary. You can go up north and see for yourself. Even if it's moving slightly, which you can't verify, so what? If Earth is moving at 67,000 mph as they say, which is faster than a speeding bullet, the stars should be different every night and be moving sideways past us like if you were on the Starship Enterprise remember? Sure they can make up something like "the stars are moving around the center of the galaxy with us at the same speed, so you can't see them moving, only rotating above us." But then that begs the question, why weren't the Apollo astronauts left in the dust when they went up into space? The Earth should have whooshed away from them since it's moving at such a high velocity. You see what I mean? Nothing makes sense in astronomy. There are dozens of contradictions like this.

The simple explanation is that Earth is not moving at all, just like we all sense with our five senses, and the establishment is lying. Why do you distrust your senses and instead believe what the establishment tells you? That means your mind is hijacked and programmed, like a bot. And you are not a freethinker who can think for yourself.

If the moon is 237,000 miles away you would not be able to see any detail on it. You can only see detail a few miles away. Stand on a mountain top and you will see. The moon also generates its own light like a light bulb. If you watch the moon on a full moon night you will see this. It is not bouncing light off the sun. The moon looks much closer than astronomy claims. Trust your own senses, not what you are told. You keep assuming authority can't lie. It can and often does.

When you bounce lasers or radio waves off the moon, you could easily be hitting the dome above us. Why don't you try bouncing lasers off the dome in the sky in general? There is definitely a barrier there. It is not open space into outer space. Also pushing a button in a lab and hearing a beep isn't proof of anything. Anyone can rig a computer to beep when you press a button.

With a large telescope you definitely can see the surface of the moon. Observatories have telescopes that can. They admit it too. Go to an observatory and ask them. Jesse Hawthorne of the Australian Observatory told Jarrah White in an interview long ago that their giant telescopoe can in fact see the Apollo artifacts from 1969. However, he won't try to because if the telescope finds nothing and it gets out in public, he would be punished for challenging the narrative and he knows it. So he won't even bother trying. Something or someone told him not to follow up with Jarrah White on using the observatory to view the Apollo 11 artifacts. This speaks volumes. If it were possible, they would do it, but they can't. Yet in theory a giant telescope can see the surface of the moon enough to pick up stuff on it.

So if you can't see dust kicking off the moon then who can? How do you know anything ever hits the moon at all? Isn't it odd that a ball of rock is floating in space yet nothing ever touches it? Ever? How come when NASA or China or India lands something on the moon, no one can ever see the craft approaching the moon? Ever? Not even with the best telescopes? Like I said, nothing can be verified. It's a reality breakdown.

Why can't rockets go straight up into space? Why does it have to circle the earth first? That makes no sense. How do you know the rockets aren't just being ditched into the ocean? How come no one has ever seen any rocket going to space at all, even after it circles the earth? Like I said, they can make up anything. It costs nothing to lie and make up ad hoc explanations. Any liar can cover their tracks, especially if you can't verify anything. Anyone can lie. Anyone can say anything. You don't get that do you? lol