Feminism--a form of Jewish control!

[fschmidt]

Of course this thread is absurd. Liberal Jews are bad, just like liberal Christians are. I could show a bunch of faces of Christian feminists and call feminism a Christian conspiracy. It's all ridiculous. Orthodox Jews hate feminism and have no interest in having any influence on non-Jewish culture. The main difference between Jews and non-Jews is that Jews tend to be successful and non-Jews tend to be failures. So Jewish liberals are successful in promoting liberalism and Jewish conservatives (Orthodox Jews) are successful at keeping out liberalism and feminism. In contrast, non-Jewish liberals tend to just be along for the ride and non-Jewish conservatives fail to keep out liberalism and feminism.

[MrPeabody]

Feminism is a Jewish invention and has nothing to do with older anglo womens' rights movements. Can you name any member of the feminist leadership (not the followers) who isn't a Jewesse? Jews tend to infiltrate and take over the leadership of any movement, which isn't hard when you control the media and other levers of power. If you don't have the media on your side, nobody knows you exist. In a similiar manner, the Jewish neocons have taken over the conservative movement. Real conservatives like Pat Buchanan are banned from television and given weird names like "paleoconservative". Then the fake conservatives move in and claim the name "conservative". That's just one example of how they take over.

[fschmidt]

Can you name any member of the feminist leadership (not the followers) who isn't a Jewesse?

I am not an expert on the history of the feminist movement and I have no desire to become one. But here is the list of important feminists on wikipedia:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_feminists

Anyone with nothing better to do with their time can go through this list classifying each as Jewish or non-Jewish and report back the results.

[MrPeabody]

I would also like to draw the distinction between the women's right movement of the 19th century and feminism. The women's right movement was formed to get men to drink less. Drinking was devastating to many families. Thus, the purpose of the Anglo woman's movement was good and their intentions were to strengthen the family by getting men to stop drinking. In contrast, Jewish feminism is based on cultural Marxism. The narrative is that white men are evil and women are their victims. The drama is a struggles of the oppressed (women) against the oppressor (men). In other words, modern feminism is a hate movement that spreads hatred against men.

Women's rights - Anglo , good intentions, purpose - strengthens families

Feminism - Jewish, bad intentions (a hate movement), purpose - destroy European and US families

You can also compare the above with the below:

Socialism - Scandinavian origins, good intentions, purpose - create strong community that can survive brutal winters.

Communism - Jewish origins, bad intentions, purpose - destroy community and culture to create totalitarian control by small minority.

[Dana]

Of course feminism is Jewish. Who runs the damned media, Hollywood, Wall Street, the government, the CFR, The Federal Reserve and the porn industry?

Feminism is just like multiculturalism, it is used by Jews to destabilize societies. Jews have talked about one world rule under Jewish law, everyone knows right?

[fschmidt]

I would also like to draw the distinction between the women's right movement of the 19th century and feminism. The women's right movement was formed to get men to drink less. Drinking was devastating to many families. Thus, the purpose of the Anglo woman's movement was good and their intentions were to strengthen the family by getting men to stop drinking. In contrast, Jewish feminism is based on cultural Marxism. The narrative is that white men are evil and women are their victims. The drama is a struggles of the oppressed (women) against the oppressor (men). In other words, modern feminism is a hate movement that spreads hatred against men.

Women's rights - Anglo , good intentions, purpose - strengthens families

Feminism - Jewish, bad intentions (a hate movement), purpose - destroy European and US families

You can also compare the above with the below:

Socialism - Scandinavian origins, good intentions, purpose - create strong community that can survive brutal winters.

Communism - Jewish origins, bad intentions, purpose - destroy community and culture to create totalitarian control by small minority.

I guess I should respond to this, just in case anyone takes it seriously. The Anglo women's movement was evil just as all women's movements are. All women's movements are the same. They tell lies about their good intentions but are really just a power grab by women. Read some Ernest Belfort Bax about early feminism, like The Legal Subjection of Men from 1908 and The Fraud of Feminism from 1913. This is all about Anglo feminism.

The thing that needs to be understood is that once women have the vote, it is all over. Women's suffrage is fatal to any culture and what happens afterward only affects the speed of the decline. Since Jews got involved with feminism after women's suffrage, as far as I see it, Jews can't be blamed for anything because it was already all over.

If Jews really were responsible for any of the world's problems, then one would expect those countries that have virtually no Jews to be free of such problems. Germany was fairly thorough at killing off its Jews and has virtually none left, but Germany is as liberal and feminist as any country. I guess the reason people like blaming Jews is because it frees them from taking responsibility for their own actions.

[MrPeabody]

I would also like to draw the distinction between the women's right movement of the 19th century and feminism. The women's right movement was formed to get men to drink less. Drinking was devastating to many families. Thus, the purpose of the Anglo woman's movement was good and their intentions were to strengthen the family by getting men to stop drinking. In contrast, Jewish feminism is based on cultural Marxism. The narrative is that white men are evil and women are their victims. The drama is a struggles of the oppressed (women) against the oppressor (men). In other words, modern feminism is a hate movement that spreads hatred against men.

Women's rights - Anglo , good intentions, purpose - strengthens families

Feminism - Jewish, bad intentions (a hate movement), purpose - destroy European and US families

You can also compare the above with the below:

Socialism - Scandinavian origins, good intentions, purpose - create strong community that can survive brutal winters.

Communism - Jewish origins, bad intentions, purpose - destroy community and culture to create totalitarian control by small minority.

I guess I should respond to this, just in case anyone takes it seriously. The Anglo women's movement was evil just as all women's movements are. All women's movements are the same. They tell lies about their good intentions but are really just a power grab by women. Read some Ernest Belfort Bax about early feminism, like The Legal Subjection of Men from 1908 and The Fraud of Feminism from 1913. This is all about Anglo feminism.

The thing that needs to be understood is that once women have the vote, it is all over. Women's suffrage is fatal to any culture and what happens afterward only affects the speed of the decline. Since Jews got involved with feminism after women's suffrage, as far as I see it, Jews can't be blamed for anything because it was already all over.

If Jews really were responsible for any of the world's problems, then one would expect those countries that have virtually no Jews to be free of such problems. Germany was fairly thorough at killing off its Jews and has virtually none left, but Germany is as liberal and feminist as any country. I guess the reason people like blaming Jews is because it frees them from taking responsibility for their own actions.

Facts are a hard thing. The infusion of hatred into women's rights movements which became "feminism" began in the 1960s primarily from neurotic Jewish women. The cultural Marxist narrative that men are oppressors of women generates conflict, anger and hatred of men. The Suffragettes were not evil. I still remember what things were like before the change of the 60s and American women were the sweetest women in the world. The culture then was functional and men and women of all classes cooperated with each other. It was hateful 60s rhetoric which brought the change. Women getting the vote was not the problem. I don't see your nutty Orthodox Jews who terrorize 8 year old girls going to school (according to one of your videos) as a solution to anything, but rather a perpetuation of Jewish neurosis onto the world.

[fschmidt]

Facts are a hard thing. The infusion of hatred into women's rights movements which became "feminism" began in the 1960s primarily from neurotic Jewish women. The cultural Marxist narrative that men are oppressors of women generates conflict, anger and hatred of men. The Suffragettes were not evil. I still remember what things were like before the change of the 60s and American women were the sweetest women in the world. The culture then was functional and men and women of all classes cooperated with each other. It was hateful 60s rhetoric which brought the change. Women getting the vote was not the problem. I don't see your nutty Orthodox Jews who terrorize 8 year old girls going to school (according to one of your videos) as a solution to anything, but rather a perpetuation of Jewish neurosis onto the world.

It's all relative. There are some young people today who see the 1980s as a golden age. The 1960s were a big jump down, but women from the 1950s were still far inferior to women from the mid-1800s. The 1920s was a jump down in the quality of women of similar size to the 1960s. Albert Einstein visited America in 1921 and had this comment:

"Above all things are the women who, as a literal fact, dominate the entire life in America. The men take an interest in absolutely nothing at all. The work and work, the like of which I have never seen anywhere yet. For the rest they are the toy dogs of the women, who spend the money in a most unmeasurable, illimitable way and wrap themselves in a fog of extravagance."

http://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.h ... 838A639EDE

The Suffragettes may not have been obviously rotten people the way modern women are, but the road to hell is paved with apparently good intentions. I seem to remember some early feminists complaining that marriage is slavery. I can look that up if needed. But to me, it is obvious that women getting the vote was the central problem. Women are not designed to make decisions in the best interest of society. Their only priority is themselves and possibly their children. Women will never support the kind of regulation of female sexuality that is needed for a functional society, so when women get the vote, this regulation will be lost and society will disintegrate.

The Orthodox Jews are one of the very few groups that understand the problem and is addressing it sensibly. I am not sure what you are specifically referring to about "nutty Orthodox Jews who terrorize 8 year old girls" but if you tell me the details, I am sure I can give you a sound explanation.

[MrPeabody]

This is the incident where Orthodox Jews spit on an 8 year old girl and were harrassing girls going to school.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yq8twVXl4GI

It is hard to tell what Einstein was referring too - probably his own Jewish community or the liberal upper class elites he was surrounded by. Men back then were nothing like the men today and were not wimps.

Here is a site to the "Jewish Orthodox Feminist Alliance". I don't see Orthodox Judaism as offering any solutions.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_Ort ... t_Alliance

Comparing 1950s women to older generations is another complicated issue requiring much research. The point is you don't need a perfect society, you just need one that is functional and works. The 1950s was functional. What we have now is disfunctional and getting worse. How can you have a society where active hatred of men is promoted and encouraged by the establishment?

Here is a small sample of hate speech from the 1960s feminism:

"All sex, even consensual sex between a married couple, is an act of violence perpetrated against a woman." Catherine MacKinnon

"All men are rapists and that's all they are."
Marilyn French, Author; (later, advisor to Al Gore's Presidential Campaign.)

"I want to see a man beaten to a bloody pulp with a high-heel shoved in his mouth, like an apple in the mouth of a pig."
Andrea Dworkin; from her book Ice and Fire .


"I feel that 'man-hating' is an honorable and viable political act, that the oppressed have a right to class-hatred against the class that is oppressing them."
Robin Morgan, Ms. Magazine Editor.

Provide me with equivalent hateful quotes from the Suffragettes.

[fschmidt]

This is the incident where Orthodox Jews spit on an 8 year old girl and were harrassing girls going to school.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yq8twVXl4GI

I completely agree with the Orthodox Jews. They have their neighborhood where they enforce a dress code. They do not tolerate slut-walks. They should be congratulated.

It is hard to tell what Einstein was referring too - probably his own Jewish community or the liberal upper class elites he was surrounded by. Men back then were nothing like the men today and were not wimps.

As I said, it's all relative. Both men and women were much better in the 1920s than they are today, but they were probably much worse than Americans in the mid-1800s. And from what Einstein said, American men were already giving in to women.

Here is a site to the "Jewish Orthodox Feminist Alliance". I don't see Orthodox Judaism as offering any solutions.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_Ort ... t_Alliance

Really? How far do you think the "Jewish Orthodox Feminist Alliance" would get in the ultra-Orthodox neighborhood where they spit on that girl? Nowhere. And that is the solution.

Comparing 1950s women to older generations is another complicated issue requiring much research. The point is you don't need a perfect society, you just need one that is functional and works. The 1950s was functional. What we have now is disfunctional and getting worse. How can you have a society where active hatred of men is promoted and encouraged by the establishment?

This is wrong. It isn't enough for a society to be functional and work in the present. It must be designed to last so that it remains functional. America in the 1950s was like a healthy person infected with a fatal desease. The society still worked but it was already doomed.

Here is a small sample of hate speech from the 1960s feminism:

...

Provide me with equivalent hateful quotes from the Suffragettes.

What's your point, that the 1960s is nastier than then the 1910s? I don't disagree. Rotting corpses tend to stink and American culture was a rotting corpse by the 1960s, but the infection came much earlier.

[MrPeabody]

This is the incident where Orthodox Jews spit on an 8 year old girl and were harrassing girls going to school.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yq8twVXl4GI

I completely agree with the Orthodox Jews. They have their neighborhood where they enforce a dress code. They do not tolerate slut-walks. They should be congratulated.

It is hard to tell what Einstein was referring too - probably his own Jewish community or the liberal upper class elites he was surrounded by. Men back then were nothing like the men today and were not wimps.

As I said, it's all relative. Both men and women were much better in the 1920s than they are today, but they were probably much worse than Americans in the mid-1800s. And from what Einstein said, American men were already giving in to women.

Here is a site to the "Jewish Orthodox Feminist Alliance". I don't see Orthodox Judaism as offering any solutions.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_Ort ... t_Alliance

Really? How far do you think the "Jewish Orthodox Feminist Alliance" would get in the ultra-Orthodox neighborhood where they spit on that girl? Nowhere. And that is the solution.

Comparing 1950s women to older generations is another complicated issue requiring much research. The point is you don't need a perfect society, you just need one that is functional and works. The 1950s was functional. What we have now is disfunctional and getting worse. How can you have a society where active hatred of men is promoted and encouraged by the establishment?

This is wrong. It isn't enough for a society to be functional and work in the present. It must be designed to last so that it remains functional. America in the 1950s was like a healthy person infected with a fatal desease. The society still worked but it was already doomed.

Here is a small sample of hate speech from the 1960s feminism:

...

Provide me with equivalent hateful quotes from the Suffragettes.

What's your point, that the 1960s is nastier than then the 1910s? I don't disagree. Rotting corpses tend to stink and American culture was a rotting corpse by the 1960s, but the infection came much earlier.

I saw the video and the 8 year old girl was covered from head to toe. That's a slut walk? Like I said - nutty Orthodox Jews.

The 1950s was not a rotting corpse. If anything, the problem was that the men who won World War II turned the country into economic prosperity and had a baby boom. As in many times, economic prosperity can be dangerous to a society. That is why the Amish keep everything simple. The conservatives who wanted to preserve the golden culture of that time didn't give up, they were defeated, in large part by Jewish led groups.

I thought you wouldn't be able to find Suffragette quotes with that level of hate, because there aren't any, which proves my point, that the Jewish Feminists are the ones who brought hate to women.

[fschmidt]

I saw the video and the 8 year old girl was covered from head to toe. That's a slut walk? Like I said - nutty Orthodox Jews.

I watched the video and it did not show what the 8 year old girl was wearing when she was spit on.

The 1950s was not a rotting corpse.

I didn't say it was, I said the 1960s were.

I thought you wouldn't be able to find Suffragette quotes with that level of hate, because there aren't any, which proves my point, that the Jewish Feminists are the ones who brought hate to women.

I didn't look because it doesn't matter to me. Unfriendly sluts are bad enough even without the hate, and that is the inevitable result of women's suffrage.

[MrPeabody]

I didn't look because it doesn't matter to me. Unfriendly sluts are bad enough even without the hate, and that is the inevitable result of women's suffrage.

It's the inevitable result of a cultural Marxist narrative which casts men as oppressors of women. The Anglo system worked with low divorce rates and large families. It's interesting the length you go to cover up for Marxist Feminists and then propose ridiculous solutions like spitting on 8 year old girls. More smoke and mirrors from the culture destroyers.

"Professor Horowitz documents that Friedan was from her college days, and until her mid-30s, a Stalinist Marxist, the political intimate of the leaders of America's Cold War fifth column and for a time even the lover of a young Communist physicist working on atomic bomb projects in Berkeley's radiation lab with J. Robert Oppenheimer. Her famous description of America's suburban family household as "a comfortable concentration camp" in "The Feminine Mystique" therefore had more to do with her Marxist hatred for America than with any of her actual experience as a housewife or mother. (Her husband, Carl, also a leftist, once complained that his wife "was in the world during the whole marriage," had a full-time maid and "seldom was a wife and a mother").

It is fascinating that Friedan not only felt the need to lie about her real views and life experience then, but still feels the need to lie about them now. Although Horowitz, the author of the new biography, is a sympathetic leftist, Friedan refused to cooperate with him once she realized he was going to tell the truth about her life as Betty Goldstein."

Betty Friedan and her Lies

http://fathersforlife.org/feminism/trut ... riedan.htm