Should BoycottAmericanWomen stay here on the Forum?

[Winston]

You guys. I don't understand what this feud is about. It seems pointless and a waste of time. I don't see anything valid being argued about. And I don't see why a poll should be used to ban someone. This forum is not supposed to be run by a mob mentality. It's supposed to be run by justice and fairness.

I can't see what the feud is about. It just seems like a lot of subjective ad hominem attacks and name calling. I don't see anything valid being debated. Nor is it clear who started it or is at fault.

That being said, the best thing to do is for those of you who don't get along to just ignore each other and stop the pointless attacks.

If this continues, I will probably just ban all feuding members for 3 days. Just drop the arguments and ignore each other if you don't like each other. There is no other fair objective way to settle this.

[Winston]

Listen guys. If you don't shape up and just ignore each other and stop this pointless feud, then I will have to hand the ban hammer to Larry Laffer. He wants to ban a lot of you, permanently too, not just temporarily. I will have no other recourse cause I don't want to deal with this. You can't ban someone just cause they are a nuisance. There has to be a legit reason. But if you guys won't stop creating threads about why someone should be banned, which degrades the forum, then we'll just have to get rid of everyone involved, to be fair.

So please, just STOP all the insults and flame wars. That's it. Simple as that.

Otherwise, I'll just hand it over to Larry Laffer.

This group is becoming a bit cliquish and territorial. I never thought it would come to that. We are supposed to be an alliance of freethinkers who live for truth, not for protecting gang territory.

[boycottamericanwomen]

You guys. I don't understand what this feud is about. It seems pointless and a waste of time. I don't see anything valid being argued about. And I don't see why a poll should be used to ban someone. This forum is not supposed to be run by a mob mentality. It's supposed to be run by justice and fairness.

I can't see what the feud is about. It just seems like a lot of subjective ad hominem attacks and name calling. I don't see anything valid being debated. Nor is it clear who started it or is at fault.

That being said, the best thing to do is for those of you who don't get along to just ignore each other and stop the pointless attacks.

If this continues, I will probably just ban all feuding members for 3 days. Just drop the arguments and ignore each other if you don't like each other. There is no other fair objective way to settle this.

Yes, I agree that this bickering is pointless, and it's clogged up the forum for the past couple of days. Thanks Winston for not catering to the whims of these Sexter and odbo people and being willing to hear my side. I'll stop commenting on any posts from Sexter, odbo, or Grunt so that I don't feed their trolling.

Sorry to inconvience you like this Winston, but a couple of days ago a person named odbo started attacking me very viciously, saying that I created the Boycott American Women site simply to make money, which is completely untrue. He started trolling me on a couple of different threads, and wouldn't leave me alone.

Anyway, I'll let it go and not react to his/her (I don't even know what sex the person is) attacks and not feed it anymore. This way the threads will die off and not be continued. Also, maybe you could lock the threads, so that no one can post any further comments. Thanks again.

[Sexter]

I voted for BAW to stay and here's why ... although I do not concur with the style of his delivery, I believe that he's taken an executive position here with a no holds bar approach to dealing with CLCs (Castrating Lesbian Cunts) & the code of silence they inflict upon groups on men.

Yes, certain *proper* persons I know, use the code acronym "CLC" clandestinely in my neck of the woods. Yet, if you dissect it, it's really a way of discussing about men-hating, castrating cunts (who're really bi-sexual at heart) w/o drawing attention. BAW is taking this type of dialogue, out of the closet, and into the ring.

As I'd said in the other post, he's the Id to our Superego.

1. giving out personal insults who give value to these boards(hence, will call you a mangina if you disagree with him)

2. gets mad if you disagree with him

3. super misogynistic about every thing

4. EVERY post is negative

5. doesn't provide any value to these boards except negativity

yeah bro, he's been an nuisance to these boards. I'm surprised the mods aren't doing shit yet. isn't this board Moderated?

i guess someone failed to read or refute this

*SMH* at the moderation team

if there are any

[Sexter]

it's funny how you bring up people who want you to stay

but yet, there's more people who want you to leave

maybe if you toned down your personal insults, acted more mature, and have more respect for other people's opinions, you would've had a majority vote.

f**k you, who are you to tell me to leave? Are you the "thought police" now? You call me immature? Hey, I'm not the one bitching and whining and trying to have people I don't like banned or kicked out. Are you even from America, because I seem to remember a few men on here implying that you were from a different country?

Maybe if you'd stop your pathetic sympathy towards American women, less men on this board would dislike you.

Those in glass houses shouldn't throw stones, my friend.

And perhaps you should try addressing the 6 points I raised.

I would also like to add that I have extensive experience in the following countries:

India
Nepal
Bangladesh
Thailand
South Korea
Hong Kong

So, I think that makes me somewhat of a valuable member of these forums, considering I have a lot of practical travel experience in different countries, and if anyone has any questions about those countries, I can do my best to answer them.

Oh yea, and I'm MARRIED to a non-American woman.

One last point- if anyone should be banned (although I do not agree that anyone should be banned simply because they disagree with one another), it should be you, odbo, and Grunt for following me wherever I go on this message board, and then hijacking the thread and using it to TROLL ME.

LOL

cool trolling bro

[odbo]

Perhaps you forgot that there are many men on this board that DEMAND that I stay?

This poll was YOUR IDEA. You lost. A man would accept it. You won't leave because you're a mangina with feminine characteristics as I previously explained. Allowing you to stay is the decision of Winston and to some extend the veteran members of this board. All I can say to those men is you sow what you reap.

[Winston]

Who is this new poster called AmericanEvil? His posts sound like that of BoycottAmericanWomen. Am I right? Can you guys check his posts and compare them to that of BAW?

[Teal Lantern]

Who is this new poster called AmericanEvil? His posts sound like that of BoycottAmericanWomen. Am I right? Can you guys check his posts and compare them to that of BAW?

Yeah, W. It's like two or three of him. They even argue with each other.
W, get some more mods and quit running the place like an absentee slumlord.
Gotta wade through their crap + all the spammers to get decent posts.
Ain't nobody got time for that.

[ethan_sg]

Precisely what I thought too Winston.

Who is this new poster called AmericanEvil? His posts sound like that of BoycottAmericanWomen. Am I right? Can you guys check his posts and compare them to that of BAW?

[zacb]

Precisely what I thought too Winston.

Who is this new poster called AmericanEvil? His posts sound like that of BoycottAmericanWomen. Am I right? Can you guys check his posts and compare them to that of BAW?

I seconded that.

[ben dover]

Boycott and AmericanWeavil are the same mouthbreathers. A resounding NO from me. Take a long walk off a short pier spambot. You add nothing. Loser.