Attitude Fanaticism
– A New Wave of
American Delusion
By Winston Wu
A type of "victim-blaming" people are what I call
"Attitude fanatics" include various types of people ranging
from tough macho types to New Age hippies, positive-thinking fanatics,
and pop
psychology followers. These people believe vehemently and
live by such
following statements
“You create
your own
reality;
thoughts create reality.”
“No one is a
victim;
everything
bad that happens to you happened cause
YOU created or
chose it. Everything is a choice. You are at fault for everything you
complain
about. You are the problem.”
“Attitude is
everything.
If anything goes wrong in your life, it must be cause
your attitude made it go wrong.”
These
mantras go in line with the
popular trend in New Age and pop psychology thinking that thoughts
create
reality, though not all "attitude fanatics" are New
Agers.
These people view the world through rose-colored glasses.
Though they do
their best to have a positive mindset, they are often in denial of
reality (and
will deny your reality too if it doesn’t fit in with theirs),
and anything that
doesn’t fit into the world they choose. They
don’t live in the real
world, but rather in a world of their own choosing in which everything
and
everyone is good and positive. Such people may be great to
hang out with
sometimes, but they are difficult to have a realistic discussion with,
for they
tend to be “deconstructionists” – those
who oppose definitions and labels to
the point where they will redefine any word in the dictionary that they
feel
like, making it difficult to have a common frame of reference with
them.
Their whole objective is to create THEIR world for themselves
to feel good in, rather than to try to understand or unify with
others.
Though they may claim to be spiritual, they are not truth seekers, for
they
only wish to create their own truth, denying any truth out there that
doesn’t
fit into their world.
Now, though its common sense that thoughts and attitudes influence
your reality,
these folks carry it much farther than that. They believe
that thoughts
and attitudes literally control and shape the physical properties of
time and
space around you and in your life, as though they were the building
blocks of
the universe. According to their logic, you have control and
choices over
your thoughts and attitudes, which in turn create your reality and all
your
experiences. Therefore, whatever happens to you, whatever
results and
outcomes befall you, MUST be of your choosing, for no one is a victim
in their
view. So if ANYTHING goes wrong, you alone must be to blame
and you alone
are responsible.
Now,
the thing is, there is some
research evidence that thought alone, without action, can INFLUENCE
reality
(e.g. PEAR - http://www.princeton.edu/~pear/,
Ganzfeld - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ganzfeld_experiment).
But there is no scientific evidence that suggests that thought CREATES
reality. If it did, we wouldn’t need cars cause we
could just teleport
ourselves at will wherever we wanted to go! LOL
I
can, for example, challenge
these believers to "create their own reality" where they can walk
through solid walls or jump off buildings and fly, yet none of them
ever rise
up to the task. Or I can invite them to create a reality
where they are
the President of the
Such
mantras seem to go against
all reality. If we really could all manufacture the physical
laws and
universe of our own reality, then we would be in a universe of all
pleasure,
peace, happiness, and no pain. Plus, it would also mean that
those with
nothing but kind positive thoughts toward everyone and everything would
never
suffer misfortunes, for the reality they create could only be good and
positive. But the fact is that they are still victim to
accidents and
misfortunes resulting in injury and even death.
Therefore,
even the most
elementary logic refutes this strange mantra that so many persist
in.
It's all part of the new "American pseudo-wisdom" which embodies
popular mantras among new age hippies and attitude fanatics such as
"you
create your own reality", "thought creates reality", "no one is a victim"
etc. It's more an American
thing though, as the New Agers and hippies in other countries don't
tend to
spout such mantras. The strange thing though, is that such
mantras don't
have much basis in reality, yet many persist in them.
These attitude fanatics tend to be
strongest on the West
Coast (New Yorkers don't like them either), where the whole culture is
all
about exuding fake optimism and a positive attitude, which most of them
believe
in. It's especially
popular in
As for me, I am neither a
perpetual optimist or
pessimist, but a realist who tells it like it is. West Coast
Americans
don't like people like me who tell it like it is. Instead,
they like
people who are optimistic and positive about everything and everybody
24/7. However, I don't believe in pretending that I like
something I
don't just to appease attitude fanatics and politically correct
drones. I
simply don't believe in being fake.
And I will
not lie to avoid their condemnation. I would prefer to be
“negative” and
honest, rather than “positive” by lying.
Naturally,
since these attitude
fanatics believe that we create everything that happens to you, they
have a
"victim-blaming" mentality, which is that all
“victims” are to blame
for their circumstances cause
they must have “chosen”
them, for no one is a victim. It doesn't matter if this is a
false claim
or that it doesn't fit the facts, for this weird mantra makes them
irrationally
think that way. They seem to insinuate that nothing bad can
happen to you,
unless you expect it to! What imbecile logic!
You'd think the obvious absurdity of this would prevent
reasonable educated
people from becoming attitude fanatics. Yet it is surprising
how many
intelligent and well-meaning people in
This
victim-blaming mentality is
very narrow and judgmental. It's their way of condemning
someone they
find annoying, but it has nothing to do with reality.
Complaining about
some result doesn't create the result in the first place, as if the
post-complaint somehow somehow went backwards in time to create the
result it
complained about. Yeah right. The result led to the
complaint, not
the other way. To claim it's the other way would be like
saying that a
baby caused its mother's pregnancy. It's
nonsensical. This
tactic of the attitude fanatic annoys me because they focus on
something
unrelated to the heart of the problem at hand. In short, they
are always
pointing the finger at the wrong cause.
In the attitude fanatic's world, attitude is the cause and solution for
everything. Anytime someone complains about going through bad
circumstances, they tell them that their "attitude is the problem" as
if it's the magical solution to all. There are a number of
problems with
this.
1) First, it is quite presumptuous for these
attitude fanatics and
victim-blamers to try to pretend they know what the problem is without
seriously investigating it, as if they were omnipotent.
2) Second, a bad attitude does not cause bad
circumstances in most cases,
unless the person is in complete control of all factors around
him/her.
Rather, the circumstances cause the attitude usually. So they
have it
backwards.
3) Third, this ideology presumes that merely fixing
one's attitude and
making it positive will turn the circumstances positive, which is a
vain wish
that is not true in reality, only in the hyped imaginary world of the
attitude
fanatic.
4) Finally, if it were true that positive attitude
= positive
circumstances and negative attitude = negative circumstances, then
everyone
could get all that they want and produce nothing but advantageous
circumstances
by merely having a positive attitude. The simple formula that
“attitude
cures all” would have been figured out centuries ago and
habitually used.
But unfortunately, reality is not like that, hence that's why not
everyone has
a hokey positive attitude all the time. I'm not trying to be
a pessimist
here, just telling how it is.
A lot of these attitude fanatics seem to like to make absurd leaps in logic. When I describe my results, for example, they prefer to focus on attitude. For instance, if I complain about constant rejection from women (even those that I have a lot in common with), many automatically claim that I get rejected because I have the "attitude" that I'm getting rejected. What the @#$%? What are these people smoking? That is the most inate logic I've ever seen. The claim had NOTHING to do with my attitude (since I have projected 100 percent positive attitudes around women, yet they still thought I wasn't their type and made lame ass excuses not to spend time with me), but with results.
Furthermore,
with regard to online
communication, 95 percent of American girls stop talking to me when
they see my
picture, even a nice handsome looking one of me. And this
happens even if
we have a lot in common or they like my
personality/self-description. On
the other hand, European and foreign women don’t tend to
disappear after seeing
my picture. It’s a huge and real difference
(proving once again for the
millionth time, that people are NOT the same everywhere as the
naïve and
politically correct like to think). Now, what does that have
to do with
my attitude, especially since they don’t see me in
person? Nothing of course.
It’s obvious common sense that
attitude fanatics always fail to take into account.
The
truth is, if I didn't get
rejected so much, I wouldn't complain about it. And not
complaining about
it doesn't reverse the result. I don't get rejected due to
bad attitude
or bad behavior. I get rejected cause
I’m not
the type of guy that women want. Though I’m not
ugly, I don’t arouse
them, do not project a masculine vibe, am not a macho pig, or they
aren’t
interested, don’t have feelings for me, don’t
feel
romantic chemistry. Sometimes, the women I date are
just changeable,
even if they were interested in me to begin with.
I’ve never been dumped
or flaked out on and told by the girl that it was due to bad attitude
or
behavior. In fact, they always tell me that it’s
nothing I did, or they
give no explanation.
And
technically, it can’t be my
attitude, because women online usually tell me they like the attitude
in my
letters to them and the qualities I describe as well. But
when they see
my photo, many of them disappear or lose interest in me. That
has NOTHING
to do with my attitude obviously, so this attitude explanation is false
and
doesn’t apply.
In
fact, I don't even have a
negative attitude. I am energetic, enthusiastic, sociable,
and a
go-getter. But even if I did, having a positive attitude
isn't going to
create attraction or make me someone's type. All it will do
is spare me
the condemnation of attitude fanatics.
And
besides, the whole
"positive attitude" thing is a subjective fad anyway. Often,
when people disagree or conflict in some way, they each perceive the
other as
"negative" when they are simply different or there is a conflict in
style. In fact, even the George Bush administration considers
all Americans
who oppose their dishonest involvement in the Iraq War, costing many
lives on
both sides, to be negative!
In
My
theory is that Americans are so
hung up on being positive because it’s too easy for them to
slide down into
depression. They live in a fake world after all, with fake
culture, fake
entertainment, movies, video games, fake happiness, fake smiles, fake
greetings, fake relationships, fake friendships, etc..
Therefore the line between their fakeness that gets them through the
day and
the depressing emptiness before them is so thin and fragile that they
constantly have to overcompensate for being positive out of the
subconscious
overwhelming fear of the negative. Thus, anyone who is
slightly
“negative” by complaining arouses the fear of
emptiness in many Americans,
especially those who have no “inner life” or
richness of soul to fall back on.
Another
thing attitude fanatics
don’t understand is that life is not meant to be all rosy and
perky. God
obviously didn’t intend it to be that way.
Sometimes you are meant to
suffer by fate, destiny, or karma whatever. Therefore,
perpetual optimism
and happiness isn’t with natural flow of the universe or
life, and thus these
people are out of touch.
Even
the mental health profession
admits that you can't always control what happens to you or your
circumstances,
only how you respond to them, which is one of the
aims of therapy.
Yet these "attitude fanatics" still insist on going way beyond that,
to the realm of "all that happens is in accordance to your choice of
thoughts and attitudes."
No
matter how much evidence you present to the contrary, "attitude
fanatics" will vehemently defend their position, which is what fanatics
do
of course. In debating them, I often challenge them to think
or believe
that they can fly and see what happens if they jump off a
building. Or I
invite them to try walking through solid walls by believing in their
firmest
attitude that they can. Amazingly, some have actually
responded by
saying that they theoretically could fly or walk through walls, if
their
attitude, belief, or mental focus was strong enough! Oh my,
where does
this delusion end?!
So you see, even though the most mundane example could debunk
this bizarre
belief, they still persist in it as though it were Gospel
truth.
It even extends into the notion that one has control over
others and others’
opinions merely by what one chooses to think of him/herself.
Of course, you can't control what others think, even about you, though
you can
try to influence or persuade them. But according to the
philosophy of
attitude fanaticism, you can, because how you perceive yourself is how
others
perceive you. So, they claim, if you think positively or
negatively about
yourself, others will see the same. And if you act confident,
people will
like and respect you. But if you behave vulnerably or think
lowly of
yourself, that's how you will be treated too.
Though there are degrees of truth to this, it's very limited
in reality,
despite what one wishes to believe. Sure people tend to like
confident
and positive people, but that isn't the chief reason why one likes or
dislikes
someone. Chemistry, taste, looks, perception and synergy are
bigger
factors in attraction than attitude, for example. You can
like yourself,
but that doesn't mean others will like you, for they still have their
preference, opinion, taste, and type, all of which are not subject to
your
attitude or thoughts. The fattest ugliest person can act
confident, try
to project the aura of a hunk or goddess, or think of him/herself
as beautiful and attractive, yet that is not how others will perceive
them.
Any realist who isn't hung up on being politically correct knows and understands that people do treat you VERY differently depending on your looks, image and appearance, hence your looks do create your lifestyle, whether you want to deny it or not. This is true regardless of your attitude, which brings up my next point. To all you attitude fanatics, idealists, and even New Agers out there who think that people are treated based on their attitude, let me tell you this. You are dead WRONG, whether you want to believe it or not. I have meticulously counted a vast array of my life experiences, and found no real empirical correlation between how someone has treated or viewed me, and my attitude about myself. In fact, many times the correlation was inversed! This "attitude" thing is just an excuse fad that a fringe group of Americans religiously cling to, even in the face of empirical evidence against it.
Also,
it is utterly false that whatever you think of yourself is what others
think of you, and easily
testable as well. I
have challenged these attitude fanatics to think of themselves all they
want,
as the President of the
In conclusion, though reality always reveals the folly and
delusion of attitude
fanaticism, its adherents continue in their denial. If their
delusions
affected only themselves, that would be one thing. But it
affects others
as well, unfortunately, given the victim-blaming nature of attitude
fanaticism.
By pointing fingers and assigning blame to anyone who complains,
suffers, or is
unfortunate, even due to circumstances beyond their control, they are
doing
more harm than good. And the sad thing is that these fanatics
don't know
it, for they mistakenly think that they are helping others and
empowering them,
when in fact all they are doing is assigning blame and fault where it
is not
due. They are ignorant of the folly of their thinking, and
even of their
own "attitude". Their logic only destroys itself, and only
serves
to alienate these fanatics from reality and from others.
Before any reasoning with them can continue, they first need
to "come back
down to Earth".
In
closing, here is the response
to this from one of my cultured readers:
“They
are seeing only a
small part of the picture. Everything is in fact energy, and
matter is
only a form of energy, so one does attract more negative stuff to him
if one is
negative. But it is not that simple. One can see very negative people
who are
rolling in dough and pussy.
There is karma that is involved and some is very thick. And
according to
Eastern Philosophies karma comes from past lives- many thousands of
them. To
get rid or transcend karma is a slow and tedious process.
People who have good karma can improve with things such as
attitude. But its is
very superficial still. There is some very heavy
karma that will
not change just because you
smile and feel positive.
It was not a bad attitude that killed people in the Tsunami
last year.
Also, I would compare two countries-
I have read some such books that would say that scarcity
comes from negativity
in the mind. OK, granted people who think scarcity will not make
efforts to
improve, but how do you deal with people who are very young and still
have not
formed any attitude? Like those kids in
The next lie is that generousity creates abundance. I would
beg to differ. The
Jews and the Chinese are very stingy. And so are the Japanese. And the Brits. And they run the
world. Look at
the ones that have most abundance.
So, I don't know. I would not study much of such modern
Western versions of
Orientalism since they get
only a partial picture. More serious studies on karma and how it is
formed and
how it can be overcome are
required.”